WCJ granted claim in Pennsylvania

2025Id.

2025Id.

2025Id.

2023Id. at 287-88 . 15 Here, by contrast, there is an accepted injury and Claimant’s review petition burden was to establish the greater extent of her injury and its work- relatedness, not to establish a work-related injury in the first place.

2020Orenich, 863 A.2d at 168 .

2020Waldameer Park, 819 A.2d at 168 .

2019Id. at 549 .

2018Claimant appealed to the Board, arguing, inter alia, that the WCJ’s findings were not supported by substantial evidence and that the decision was contrary to Schrader Bellows Pneumatics v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Earle), 711 A.2d 578 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998).

2016Id. at 516-17 .

2015Id. at 745-46 .

2014In Reyes, 967 A.2d at 1079-80 , we addressed whether a claimant was entitled to litigation costs where the WCJ granted the claim petition and ordered the employer to pay reasonable and necessary medical expenses related to the work injury, but denied compensation benefits because any loss of earning power was due to the claimant’s misconduct and not the work-related injury.

2009Peer, 503 A.2d 1096 , and Bechtel Power Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Postlethwait), 167 Pa.Cmwlth. 544 , 648 A.2d 1266 (1994), explain how a claimant proves that he was reimbursed for commuting time and expenses.

2009Peer, 503 A.2d 1096 , and Bechtel Power Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Postlethwait), 167 Pa.Cmwlth. 544 , 648 A.2d 1266 (1994), explain how a claimant proves that he was reimbursed for commuting time and expenses.

2009Peer, 503 A.2d 1096 , and Bechtel Power Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Postlethwait), 167 Pa.Cmwlth. 544 , 648 A.2d 1266 (1994), explain how a claimant proves that he was reimbursed for commuting time and expenses.

2005Citing Lemansky v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Hagan Ice Cream Company), 738 A.2d 498 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999), Darrall asserted, inter alia, that the WCJ erred by failing to grant her penalty petition since Heinz failed to issue a notice of compensation payable in violation of Section 406.1 of the Act. 4 This Court rejected Darrall’s claim for attorney fees noting that Heinz did nothing improper.

2001He cites Hill v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll), 745 A.2d 56 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000), appeal granted, — Pa.-, 782 A.2d 550 (2001), where a WCJ granted a claim petition but found that the claimant’s disability changed to partial as of the date that the employer offered her alternative employment.