Bagley standard (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

Bagley standard in Texas

12 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Estorque v. Schafergreen
texapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025See Estorque, 302 S.W.3d at 26 (“Qualifications must appear in the expert report and cannot be inferred.”).

11
Ex parte Lalondegreen
texcrimapp · 2019 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
1 sentence

2021App. 1989) (adopting Bagley standard of materiality); see Lalonde, 570 S.W.3d at 725 . 2.

11
Wyatt v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 676 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985); see also Wyatt v. State, 23 S.W.3d 18, 27 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); Thomas v. State, 841 S.W.2d 399, 404 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). 4 .

2002United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 676 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985); see also Wyatt v. State, 23 S.W.3d 18, 27 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); Thomas v. State, 841 S.W.2d 399, 404 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). 4 .

11
Thomas v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 676 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985); see also Wyatt v. State, 23 S.W.3d 18, 27 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); Thomas v. State, 841 S.W.2d 399, 404 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). 4 .

2002United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 676 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985); see also Wyatt v. State, 23 S.W.3d 18, 27 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); Thomas v. State, 841 S.W.2d 399, 404 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). 4 .

11
State v. DeLeongreen
texapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See State v. DeLeon , 971 S.W.2d 701, 705-06 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d).

2001See State v. DeLeon , 971 S.W.2d 701, 705-06 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d).

11
Kyles v. Whitleygreen
scotus · 1995 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999Id. at 1566.

1999Id. at 1566.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Bagley green
scotus · 1985
2 sentences

1996Moreover, the Supreme Court has held that the Bagley standard may be legitimately characterized as either a “harmless error” standard or a “materiality” standard: “Although this rule is stated in terms that treat the knowing use of perjured testimony as error subject to a harmless error review, it may as easily be stated as a materiality standard.” Id. at 679-680 , 105 S.Ct. at 3382 .

1996Moreover, the Supreme Court has held that the Bagley standard may be legitimately characterized as either a “harmless error” standard or a “materiality” standard: “Although this rule is stated in terms that treat the knowing use of perjured testimony as error subject to a harmless error review, it may as easily be stated as a materiality standard.” Id. at 679-680 , 105 S.Ct. at 3382 .

51996–2024
Pena, Jose Luis green
texcrimapp · 2011
2 sentences

2012Pena, 353 S.W.3d at 811 .

2012Pena , 353 S.W.3d at 811 .

22012–2012
Miles, Ex Parte Richard Ray Jr. green
texcrimapp · 2012
1 sentence

2024App. 1989) (adopting Bagley standard of materiality); Miles, 359 S.W.3d at 665 .

12024–2024
Wearry v. Cain green
scotus · 2016
1 sentence

2016Had defense counsel properly prepared Kenneth to testify consistently with his original statement to the police and his grand jury testimony, then defense counsel would have been in a position to argue to the jury that Applicant had no more than ten minutes in which to commit the offense. 51 Indeed, as is the case with the Bagley test for materiality, under the Strickland test for prejudice, Applicant “can prevail even if” trial counsel’s deficiency “may not have affected the jury’s verdict.” Wearry v. Cain, 136 S.Ct. at 1006 n.6.

12016–2016

Where else courts name it

TX 12 (1996–2025) CA 6 (1969–2008) NJ 6 (1991–2024) CT 6 (1989–2003) MA 5 (1986–2007) CO 5 (1991–2013) IA 5 (1987–2018) NY 5 (1990–2008) MD 5 (1993–2006) FL 4 (1986–2005) OH 4 (1995–2020) IN 3 (1998–2013) VA 3 (1987–1996) LA 3 (1995–1997) WY 2 (1986–1996) RI 2 (1988–2016) SD 2 (1990–1992) NE 2 (2006–2017) AL 2 (1991–1996) TN 2 (1999–2001) NH 2 (1989–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check