Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1931–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hood v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Id.; Delapaz v. State, 297 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2009, no pet.) (citing Hood v. State, 944 S.W.2d 743, 746 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, 3 We note that Rule 608(b) prohibits a party from attempting to attack a witness’s credibility through specific instances of misconduct. 2015Id.; Delapaz v. State, 297 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2009, no pet.) (citing Hood v. State, 944 S.W.2d 743, 746 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, 3 We note that Rule 608(b) prohibits a party from attempting to attack a witness’s credibility through specific instances of misconduct. | 5 | 5 |
Roberts v. Allisongreen2 sentences2021Roberts v. Allison, 836 S.W.2d 185, 191 (Tex. App.―Tyler 1992, writ denied). 1996Roberts v. Allison, 836 S.W.2d 185, 191 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1992, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
DELAPAZ v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Id.; Delapaz v. State, 297 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2009, no pet.) (citing Hood v. State, 944 S.W.2d 743, 746 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, 3 We note that Rule 608(b) prohibits a party from attempting to attack a witness’s credibility through specific instances of misconduct. 2015Id.; Delapaz v. State, 297 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2009, no pet.) (citing Hood v. State, 944 S.W.2d 743, 746 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, 3 We note that Rule 608(b) prohibits a party from attempting to attack a witness’s credibility through specific instances of misconduct. | 2 | 2 |
Hitt v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Hitt, 53 S.W.3d at 705 ; McCulloch, 39 S.W.3d at 684 . | 1 | 1 |
Marburger v. Seminole Pipeline Co.green1 sentence2017See Marburger v. Seminole Pipeline Co., 957 S.W.2d 82, 86 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet. denied) (concluding that parol evidence is admissible to show fraudulent inducement). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stephens v. State
green
2 sentences2010Stephens , 978 S.W.2d at 732 . 2010Stephens, 978 S.W.2d at 732 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
McCulloch v. State
green
1 sentence2017See Hitt, 53 S.W.3d at 705 ; McCulloch, 39 S.W.3d at 684 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Smyth v. Caswell
neutral
1 sentence1931The papers examined were already in the case and admitted to be genuine, or were such as the appellant was estopped to deny the genuineness of. 1 Greenleaf, 578, 581; 1 Wharton’s Law of Evidence, 713; Abbott’s Trial Evidence, 396; Best on Evidence, 239.” This is approved in Smyth v. Caswell, 67 Texas, 573 , 4 S. W., 848 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.