Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.green2 sentences2006P. 166a(i), but are instead A evidentiary components @ that may prove an element of a cause of action); Kawecki v. Int = l Bank of Commerce , No. 14-01-01025, 2003 WL 21782345 , *6 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] July 31, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (motion alleging there is no evidence of mental anguish shifts burden to non-movant to produce evidence); Boyles v. Kerr , 855 S.W.2d 593, 594 ( A [a] claimant may recover mental anguish damages only in connection with defendant = s breach of some other legal duty @ ) (Tex. 1993); Everett v. TK‑Taito, L.L.C. , 178 S 2006P. 166a(i), but are instead "evidentiary components” that may prove an element of a cause of action); Kawecki v. Int’l Bank of Commerce, No. 14-01-01025-CV, 2003 WL 21782345 , *6 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] July 31, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (motion alleging there is no evidence of mental anguish shifts burden to non-movant to produce evidence); Boyles v. Kerr, 855 S.W.2d 593, 594 ("[a] claimant may recover mental anguish damages only in connection with defendant’s breach of some other legal duly”) (Tex.1993); Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C., 178 S.W.3d 844, 860 | 3 | 3 |
Boyles v. Kerrgreen2 sentences2006P. 166a(i), but are instead A evidentiary components @ that may prove an element of a cause of action); Kawecki v. Int = l Bank of Commerce , No. 14-01-01025, 2003 WL 21782345 , *6 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] July 31, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (motion alleging there is no evidence of mental anguish shifts burden to non-movant to produce evidence); Boyles v. Kerr , 855 S.W.2d 593, 594 ( A [a] claimant may recover mental anguish damages only in connection with defendant = s breach of some other legal duty @ ) (Tex. 1993); Everett v. TK‑Taito, L.L.C. , 178 S 2006P. 166a(i), but are instead "evidentiary components” that may prove an element of a cause of action); Kawecki v. Int’l Bank of Commerce, No. 14-01-01025-CV, 2003 WL 21782345 , *6 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] July 31, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (motion alleging there is no evidence of mental anguish shifts burden to non-movant to produce evidence); Boyles v. Kerr, 855 S.W.2d 593, 594 ("[a] claimant may recover mental anguish damages only in connection with defendant’s breach of some other legal duly”) (Tex.1993); Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C., 178 S.W.3d 844, 860 | 2 | 2 |
Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P. v. Justissgreen2 sentences2011Cf. Kinder Morgan N. Tex. Pipeline, L.P. v. Justiss, 202 S.W.3d 427, 448-49 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2006, no pet.) (reversing exemplary damages based on claim that defendant maliciously encroached on property found to have already been adversely possessed by plaintiff; evidence showed that defendant knew ownership of the property was in dispute, but record contained no evidence that defendant knew it was without rights to the encroached-upon property). [9] Summary judgment on the Sebers' exemplary damages claim was proper. 2011Cf. Kinder Morgan N. Tex. Pipeline, L.P. v. Justiss, 202 S.W.3d 427, 448-49 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2006, no pet.) (reversing exemplary damages based on claim that defendant maliciously encroached on property found to have already been adversely possessed by plaintiff; evidence showed that defendant knew ownership of the property was in dispute, but record contained no evidence that defendant knew it was without rights to the encroached-upon property). 9 Summary judgment on the Sebers’ exemplary damages claim was proper. | 1 | 2 |
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reedgreen1 sentence2024And a “breach of contract cannot support recovery of exemplary damages.” Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of Alton, 354 S.W.3d 407, 417 (Tex. 2011) 14 (quoting Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617, 618 (Tex. 1986)). 10 Therefore, the exemplary damages claim was not disposed of in the order before us. 11 Because the order before us does not dispose of all pending claims, we conclude that it is not a final, appealable order. | 1 | 1 |
Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of Altongreen1 sentence2024And a “breach of contract cannot support recovery of exemplary damages.” Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of Alton, 354 S.W.3d 407, 417 (Tex. 2011) 14 (quoting Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617, 618 (Tex. 1986)). 10 Therefore, the exemplary damages claim was not disposed of in the order before us. 11 Because the order before us does not dispose of all pending claims, we conclude that it is not a final, appealable order. | 1 | 1 |
Wagner v. FedEx Freight, Inc.green1 sentence2023See Wagner, 315 F.Supp.3d at 923 (“Essentially, despite restricting the method and manner in which an employee could recover damages for an on-the-job injury, the TWCA did not preclude a deceased employee’s spouse and heirs from pursuing an exemplary damages claim—a cause of action that existed prior to the passage of the TWCA—because the Texas Constitution expressly recognizes such a right to recover damages” (emphasis added).). | 1 | 1 |
Wilen v. Falkensteingreen1 sentence2016TriCounty relies on this court’s opinion in Wilen v. Falkenstein to show that a trespass can be malicious and that it has alleged similar behavior by Verizon in intentionally occupying its poles .without paying any rent and in refusing to negotiate a new rental amount in accordance with Appendix B of the JUA. 191 S.W.3d 791, 800-01 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (citing law that “[e]xemplary damages are recoverable for the tort of trespass if the trespass was committed maliciously” and holding evidence sufficient to show that Wilen’s conduct showed a “specific intent to cause substant | 1 | 1 |
Curtis v. Gibbsgreen1 sentence2003See Clawson v. Millard , 934 S.W.2d 899, 900 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1996, orig. proceeding) (citing Curtis v. Gibbs , 511 S.W.2d 263, 267 ( Tex. 1974)). [19] Further, dismissal is inappropriate because the Gaonas have asserted an exemplary damages claim against Tyler , as well as claims against third parties. | 1 | 1 |
Clawson v. Millardgreen1 sentence2003See Clawson v. Millard , 934 S.W.2d 899, 900 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1996, orig. proceeding) (citing Curtis v. Gibbs , 511 S.W.2d 263, 267 ( Tex. 1974)). [19] Further, dismissal is inappropriate because the Gaonas have asserted an exemplary damages claim against Tyler , as well as claims against third parties. | 1 | 1 |
Gunn Infiniti, Inc. v. O'BYRNEgreen1 sentence2000See Gunn Infiniti, Inc., 963 S.W.2d at 798-99 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
red
1 sentence2024Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 205–06 (recognizing that when an appellate court must look to the record, “if the record reveals the existence of parties or claims not mentioned in the order, the order is not final”). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Ross v. Union Carbide Corp.
green
1 sentence2018Ross v. Union Carbide Corp. , 296 S.W.3d 206 , 214 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (en banc). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of McAllen, Inc.
green
1 sentence2016The order did award post-judgment interest and costs, include a Mother Hubbard clause, and state that the judgment could be enforced through “abstract, execution and any other process necessary.” Id. at 830 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.