Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.green2 sentences2016Co. v. Crump, 330 S.W.3d 211, 215-17 (Tex. 2010) (discussing legal standard under the Robinson analysis and the Gammill analysis); Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. 972 S.W.2d 713, 726-28 (Tex. 1998) (outlining the Gammill analysis); Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549, 557 (listing six non-exclusive factors). 2016Co. v. Crump, 330 S.W.3d 211, 215-17 (Tex. 2010) (discussing legal standard under the Robinson analysis and the Gammill analysis); Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. 972 S.W.2d 713, 726-28 (Tex. 1998) (outlining the Gammill analysis); Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549, 557 (listing six non-exclusive factors). | 4 | 5 |
Paschal v. Great Western Drilling, Ltd.green2 sentences2015Drilling, Ltd., 215 S.W.3d 437, 448 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2006, pet. denied) (holding Gammill test appropriate for expert testimony of a certified public accountant regarding analysis of financial records for tracing of embezzled funds). 2012Drilling, Ltd. , 215 S.W.3d 437, 448 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2006, pet. denied) (holding Gammill test appropriate for expert testimony of a certified public accountant regarding analysis of financial records for tracing of embezzled funds). | 3 | 3 |
State Farm Lloyds v. Mirelesgreen2 sentences2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . 2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . | 1 | 3 |
Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. Crumpgreen2 sentences2016Co. v. Crump, 330 S.W.3d 211, 215-17 (Tex. 2010) (discussing legal standard under the Robinson analysis and the Gammill analysis); Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. 972 S.W.2d 713, 726-28 (Tex. 1998) (outlining the Gammill analysis); Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549, 557 (listing six non-exclusive factors). 2016Co. v. Crump, 330 S.W.3d 211, 215-17 (Tex. 2010) (discussing legal standard under the Robinson analysis and the Gammill analysis); Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. 972 S.W.2d 713, 726-28 (Tex. 1998) (outlining the Gammill analysis); Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549, 557 (listing six non-exclusive factors). | 1 | 1 |
EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinsongreen2 sentences2016Co. v. Crump, 330 S.W.3d 211, 215-17 (Tex. 2010) (discussing legal standard under the Robinson analysis and the Gammill analysis); Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. 972 S.W.2d 713, 726-28 (Tex. 1998) (outlining the Gammill analysis); Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549, 557 (listing six non-exclusive factors). 2016Co. v. Crump, 330 S.W.3d 211, 215-17 (Tex. 2010) (discussing legal standard under the Robinson analysis and the Gammill analysis); Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. 972 S.W.2d 713, 726-28 (Tex. 1998) (outlining the Gammill analysis); Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549, 557 (listing six non-exclusive factors). | 1 | 1 |
Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Heltongreen1 sentence2015Havner predated Gammill and thus did not use the phrase ″analytical gap,″ but post-Gammill analysis of whether animal studies provide a reliable basis for a causation opinion fit under this rubric. 1555 See Volkswagen of Am., Inc. v. Ramirez, 159 S.W.3d 897, 904-06 (Tex. 2004); Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Helton, 133 S.W.3d 245, 254, 257-58 (Tex. 2004), abrogated on other grounds by Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy Trust, 268 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. 2008). 1556 Brown, supra note 1, at 805; see also Johnson v. Arkema, Inc., 685 F.3d 452, 460 (5th Cir. 2012) (″An expert may extrapolate data from studies o | 1 | 1 |
Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Ramirezgreen2 sentences2015Havner predated Gammill and thus did not use the phrase ″analytical gap,″ but post-Gammill analysis of whether animal studies provide a reliable basis for a causation opinion fit under this rubric. 1555 See Volkswagen of Am., Inc. v. Ramirez, 159 S.W.3d 897, 904-06 (Tex. 2004); Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Helton, 133 S.W.3d 245, 254, 257-58 (Tex. 2004), abrogated on other grounds by Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy Trust, 268 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. 2008). 1556 Brown, supra note 1, at 805; see also Johnson v. Arkema, Inc., 685 F.3d 452, 460 (5th Cir. 2012) (″An expert may extrapolate data from studies o 2015For the first expert, Ronald Walker, the Court relied on both the Daubert factors and the Gammill test to hold that his opinion was solely ″his subjective interpretation of the facts,″ ″unreliable,″ and ″no evidence.″ Ramirez, 159 S.W.3d at 906 . | 1 | 1 |
Gregory Johnson v. Arkema, Incorporatedgreen1 sentence2015Havner predated Gammill and thus did not use the phrase ″analytical gap,″ but post-Gammill analysis of whether animal studies provide a reliable basis for a causation opinion fit under this rubric. 1555 See Volkswagen of Am., Inc. v. Ramirez, 159 S.W.3d 897, 904-06 (Tex. 2004); Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Helton, 133 S.W.3d 245, 254, 257-58 (Tex. 2004), abrogated on other grounds by Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy Trust, 268 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. 2008). 1556 Brown, supra note 1, at 805; see also Johnson v. Arkema, Inc., 685 F.3d 452, 460 (5th Cir. 2012) (″An expert may extrapolate data from studies o | 1 | 1 |
Valtierra v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Valtierra v. State, 310 S.W.3d 442, 447 (Tex.Crim.App.2010). | 1 | 1 |
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASS'N v. Pigottgreen2 sentences2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . 2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . | 1 | 1 |
Prystash v. Stategreen1 sentence2014However, we conclude nothing about this exchange estops the State from asserting its issue on appeal. "[T]he law of invited error estops a party from making an appellate error of an action it induced.” Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522, 531 (Tex.Crim.App.1999) (" ‘The rule in question [invited error] is but a deduction from the doctrine of estoppel. | 1 | 1 |
State Farm Lloyds v. Hamiltongreen2 sentences2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . 2014Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727 ; see Pigott, 154 S.W.3d at 630 ; Mireles, 63 S.W.3d at 494-95 ; see also Hamilton, 265 S.W.3d at 730 . | 1 | 1 |
LaSalle Pipeline, LP v. Donnell Lands, L.P.green2 sentences2013Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 726-27 (declining to apply the Robinson factors to expert engineering testimony, although it was scientific in nature); see LaSalle Pipeline, LP v. Donnell Lands, L.P., 336 S.W.3d 306, 315 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2010, pet. denied) (relying on the Gammill standard to evaluate expert appraiser’s testimony). 2013Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 726-27 (declining to apply the Robinson factors to expert engineering testimony, although it was scientific in nature); see LaSalle Pipeline, LP v. Donnell Lands, L.P., 336 S.W.3d 306, 315 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2010, pet. denied) (relying on the Gammill standard to evaluate expert appraiser’s testimony). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Taylor v. American Fabritech, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006See Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727-28 ; Taylor, 132 S.W.3d at 619 . 2006See Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 727-28 ; Taylor, 132 S.W.3d at 619 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy Trust
green
1 sentence2015Havner predated Gammill and thus did not use the phrase ″analytical gap,″ but post-Gammill analysis of whether animal studies provide a reliable basis for a causation opinion fit under this rubric. 1555 See Volkswagen of Am., Inc. v. Ramirez, 159 S.W.3d 897, 904-06 (Tex. 2004); Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Helton, 133 S.W.3d 245, 254, 257-58 (Tex. 2004), abrogated on other grounds by Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy Trust, 268 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. 2008). 1556 Brown, supra note 1, at 805; see also Johnson v. Arkema, Inc., 685 F.3d 452, 460 (5th Cir. 2012) (″An expert may extrapolate data from studies o | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.