Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 2011–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
G & H TOWING CO. v. Mageegreen2 sentences2026A judgment that grants more relief than a party is entitled to is erroneous and subject to reversal—but “only those portions of the judgment based on harmful error.” G & H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347 S.W.3d 293, 298 (Tex. 2011); see Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 200 . 2025See G & H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347 S.W.3d 293, 298 (Tex. 2011) (holding that “[w]hen a trial court grants more relief than requested and, therefore, makes an otherwise partial summary judgment final, that judgment, although erroneous, is final and appealable[; t]he court of appeals should treat such a summary judgment as any other final judgment, considering all matters raised and reversing only those portions of the judgment based on harmful error”). 5 Pipe LLC, 564 S.W.3d 167, 180 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, no pet.); Barrand, Inc. v. Whataburger, Inc., 214 S.W.3d 122, 143 (Tex. App | 4 | 10 |
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.red2 sentences2026A judgment that grants more relief than a party is entitled to is erroneous and subject to reversal—but “only those portions of the judgment based on harmful error.” G & H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347 S.W.3d 293, 298 (Tex. 2011); see Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 200 . 2014CODE ANN. § 51.012 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.); Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). 7 final judgment, considering all matters raised and reversing only those portions of the judgment based on harmful error.” G & H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347 S.W.3d 293, 298 (Tex. 2011) (citing Page v. Geller, 941 S.W.2d 101, 102 (Tex. 1997) (per curiam)). | 3 | 3 |
Page v. Gellergreen2 sentences2015Page v. Geller, 941 S.W.2d 101, 102 (Tex.1997) (per All Citations curiam). 2014CODE ANN. § 51.012 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.); Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). 7 final judgment, considering all matters raised and reversing only those portions of the judgment based on harmful error.” G & H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347 S.W.3d 293, 298 (Tex. 2011) (citing Page v. Geller, 941 S.W.2d 101, 102 (Tex. 1997) (per curiam)). | 3 | 3 |
Fortitude Energy, LLC v. Sooner Pipe LLCgreen1 sentence2025See G & H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347 S.W.3d 293, 298 (Tex. 2011) (holding that “[w]hen a trial court grants more relief than requested and, therefore, makes an otherwise partial summary judgment final, that judgment, although erroneous, is final and appealable[; t]he court of appeals should treat such a summary judgment as any other final judgment, considering all matters raised and reversing only those portions of the judgment based on harmful error”). 5 Pipe LLC, 564 S.W.3d 167, 180 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, no pet.); Barrand, Inc. v. Whataburger, Inc., 214 S.W.3d 122, 143 (Tex. App | 1 | 1 |
Barrand, Inc. v. Whataburger, Inc.green1 sentence2025See G & H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347 S.W.3d 293, 298 (Tex. 2011) (holding that “[w]hen a trial court grants more relief than requested and, therefore, makes an otherwise partial summary judgment final, that judgment, although erroneous, is final and appealable[; t]he court of appeals should treat such a summary judgment as any other final judgment, considering all matters raised and reversing only those portions of the judgment based on harmful error”). 5 Pipe LLC, 564 S.W.3d 167, 180 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, no pet.); Barrand, Inc. v. Whataburger, Inc., 214 S.W.3d 122, 143 (Tex. App | 1 | 1 |
Bauer v. Jassogreen1 sentence2025See G & H Towing Co. v. Magee, 347 S.W.3d 293, 298 (Tex. 2011) (holding that “[w]hen a trial court grants more relief than requested and, therefore, makes an otherwise partial summary judgment final, that judgment, although erroneous, is final and appealable[; t]he court of appeals should treat such a summary judgment as any other final judgment, considering all matters raised and reversing only those portions of the judgment based on harmful error”). 5 Pipe LLC, 564 S.W.3d 167, 180 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, no pet.); Barrand, Inc. v. Whataburger, Inc., 214 S.W.3d 122, 143 (Tex. App | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.green1 sentence2017A court of appeals “should treat such a summary judgment as any other final judgment, considering all matters raised and reversing only those portions of the judgment based on harmful error.” Magee, 347 S.W.3d at 298 ; see also Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C., 73 S.W.3d 193, 204 (Tex. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||