Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Langham v. Stategreen2 sentences2016App. May 25, 2016) (footnotes omitted). 5 See Langham v. State, 305 S.W.3d 568, 582 (Tex. Crim. 2013See Langham v. State, 305 S.W.3d 568, 582 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Leday v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See Leday v. State, 983 S.W.2d 713, 717 (Tex.Cr.App.1998) (improper admission of evidence is not reversible error if the same facts are shown by other evidence which is not challenged). 2007See Leday v. State , 983 S.W.2d 713, 717 (Tex.Cr.App. 1998) (improper admission of evidence is not reversible error if the same facts are shown by other evidence which is not challenged). | 2 | 2 |
Harris v. Stategreen2 sentences1998See 790 S.W.2d 568 , 585-87 (Tex.Crim.App.1989). 1993Additionally, based upon the criteria set forth in Harris v. State, 790 S.W.2d 568, 585-87 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), we hold beyond a reasonable doubt that any error in the admission of this testimony was harmless because it did not contribute to his conviction or to the punishment assessed. | 2 | 2 |
Miles v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See id. (holding that trial court committed constitutional error in overruling objection to prosecutor’s misstatement of law concerning presumption of innocence but concluding that error was harmless).2 We overrule appellant’s first issue. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See id. | 1 | 1 |
Joseph Rodriguez v. Stategreen1 sentence2016On this record, we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that any error in admitting evidence related to the drugs 21 Duress is “a confession-and-avoidance or ‘justification’ type of defense” that “requires appellant to first admit that [she] ‘engaged in the proscribed conduct’ by admitting to all elements of the underlying offense, then claim that [her] commission of the offense is justified because of other facts.” Rodriguez v. State, 368 S.W.3d 821, 824 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012, no pet.); see Tex. Penal Code § 8.05(a) (“It is an affirmative defense to prosecution that the acto | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lairdgreen1 sentence2015See id. | 1 | 1 |
Satterwhite v. Texasgreen1 sentence1994See Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at 257 ; Young, 820 S.W.2d at 190 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. State
green
1 sentence2016For constitutional error,5 we apply rule 44.2(a) and reverse the trial court’s judgment unless we determine beyond a reasonable doubt that any error was 4 Johnson v. State, No. PD-1496-14, 2016 WL 3017842 , at *10–11 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Snowden, Rion Pheal
green
1 sentence2013Snowden, 353 S.W.3d at 818 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Young v. State
green
1 sentence1994See Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at 257 ; Young, 820 S.W.2d at 190 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.