Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Juarez v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See generally Juarez v. State, 308 S.W.3d 398, 404-05 (Tex. Crim. 2015See generally Juarez v. State, 308 S.W.3d 398, 404-05 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Chapman v. Stategreen1 sentence2021If the Court is nevertheless going to rely by analogy on non-lesser-included offense cases that do not explicitly address the degree of factual specificity that is required to preserve a request for a jury instruction, I would call the Court’s attention to Chapman v. State, 921 S.W.2d 694, 695 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Texas Department of Transportation v. Ablegreen1 sentence2013P. 44.1; Tex. Dep’t of Transp. v. Able, 35 S.W.3d 608, 617 (Tex. 2000). because the request for a jury instruction was only made orally. | 1 | 1 |
Woods v. Crane Carrier Co., Inc.green1 sentence1993Tex.R.Civ.P. 273; Woods v. Crane Carrier Co., Inc., 693 S.W.2d 377, 379 (Tex.1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miers v. State
green
2 sentences2019Miers v. State was not a case involving tampering, attempted tampering, or a request for a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense. 251 S.W.2d 404 (Tex. Crim. 2019Miers v. State was not a case involving tampering, attempted tampering, or a request for a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense. 251 S.W.2d 404 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Bennett v. State
green
2 sentences2008The issue in this case is very close to the one recently decided by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Bennett v. State, 235 S.W.3d 241 (Tex.Crim.App.2007). 2008The issue in this case is very close to the one recently decided by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Bennett v. State, 235 S.W.3d 241 (Tex.Crim.App.2007). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Bargas v. State
green
1 sentence2025Bargas v. State, 252 S.W.3d 876 , 900–01 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, pet. ref’d); see TEX. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Panizo v. YOUNG MEN'S ASS'N
green
1 sentence1998Id. § 38.002. [3] We previously abated this case for the trial court to determine whether Lincoln's demand letter was a part of the record. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Kimmelman v. Morrison
green
2 sentences1994Point of error two is overruled. *233 Under Ms discussion of point of error three, appellant candidly admits that the failure to file a Motion to Suppress Evidence does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel per se, citing Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365 , 106 S.Ct. 2574 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986). 1994Point of error two is overruled. *233 Under Ms discussion of point of error three, appellant candidly admits that the failure to file a Motion to Suppress Evidence does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel per se, citing Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365 , 106 S.Ct. 2574 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.