Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2025However, the trial court 10 is not required to conduct a formal Rule 403 hearing or announce that it is conducting the balancing test, and it “is not required to place the results of its balancing test on the record.” Colvin v. State, 54 S.W.3d 82, 85 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2001, no pet.) (citing Williams, 958 S.W.2d at 195 ). 2025However, the trial court is not required to conduct a formal Rule 403 hearing or announce that it is conducting the balancing test, and it “is not required to place the results of its balancing test on the record.” Colvin v. State, 54 S.W.3d 82, 85 (Tex. App.— Texarkana 2001, no pet.) (citing Williams, 958 S.W.2d at 195 ). | 6 | 10 |
Colvin v. Stategreen2 sentences2025However, the trial court 10 is not required to conduct a formal Rule 403 hearing or announce that it is conducting the balancing test, and it “is not required to place the results of its balancing test on the record.” Colvin v. State, 54 S.W.3d 82, 85 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2001, no pet.) (citing Williams, 958 S.W.2d at 195 ). 2025However, the trial court is not required to conduct a formal Rule 403 hearing or announce that it is conducting the balancing test, and it “is not required to place the results of its balancing test on the record.” Colvin v. State, 54 S.W.3d 82, 85 (Tex. App.— Texarkana 2001, no pet.) (citing Williams, 958 S.W.2d at 195 ). | 4 | 4 |
Catrina Maldonado v. Stategreen2 sentences2025“Rather, the trial court is presumed to engage in the required balancing test once a party objects on the ground of Rule 403 and the trial court rules on the objection, unless the record indicates otherwise.” Id.; see Williams, 958 S.W.2d at 195–96; Maldonado v. State, 452 S.W.3d 898, 906 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2014, no pet.). 2025“Rather, the trial court is presumed to engage in the required balancing test once a party objects on the ground of Rule 403 and the trial court rules on the objection, unless the record indicates otherwise.” Id.; see Williams, 958 S.W.2d at 195–96; Maldonado v. State, 452 S.W.3d 898, 906 (Tex. App.— Texarkana 2014, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Walker v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Walker v. State, 4 S.W.3d 98, 103 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, pet. ref’d) (citing Rojas v. State, 986 S.W.2d 241, 250 (Tex. Crim. 2000App. 1997); Walker v. State , 4 S.W.3d 98, 103 (Tex. App.--Waco 1999, pet ref'd)(the trial court is not required to place the results of its balancing test on the record). | 2 | 2 |
Rojas v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Walker v. State, 4 S.W.3d 98, 103 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, pet. ref’d) (citing Rojas v. State, 986 S.W.2d 241, 250 (Tex. Crim. 1999Rojas, 986 S.W.2d at 250 ; Williams, 958 S.W.2d at 195 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||