complaint to support claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

complaint to support claim in Washington

12 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Tulalip Tribes Of Washington Et Ano, V. Lexington Insurance Companygreen
washctapp · 2025 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025Tulalip, 566 P.3d at 154. “‘A CR 12(b)(6) motion may be granted only where there is not only an absence of facts set out in the Complaint to support a claim of relief, but there is no hypothetical set of facts that could conceivably be raised by the Complaint to support a legally sufficient claim.’” Id. (quoting Worthington v. Westnet, 182 Wn.2d 500, 505 , 341 P.3d 995 (2015)).

2025Tulalip, 566 P.3d at 154. “‘A CR 12(b)(6) motion may be granted only where there is not only an absence of facts set out in the Complaint to support a claim of relief, but there is no hypothetical set of facts that could conceivably be raised by the Complaint to support a legally sufficient claim.’” Id. (quoting Worthington v. Westnet, 182 Wn.2d 500, 505 , 341 P.3d 995 (2015)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Worthington v. WestNET green
wash · 2015
2 sentences

2025“A CR 12(b)(6) motion may be granted only where there is not only an absence of facts set out in the Complaint to support a claim of relief, but there is no hypothetical set of facts that could conceivably be raised by the Complaint to support a legally sufficient claim.” Worthington v. Westnet, 182 Wn.2d 500, 505 , 341 P.3d 995 (2015).

2025“A CR 12(b)(6) motion may be granted only where there is not only an absence of facts set out in the Complaint to support a claim of relief, but there is no hypothetical set of facts that could conceivably be raised by the Complaint to support a legally sufficient claim.” Worthington v. Westnet, 182 Wn.2d 500, 505 , 341 P.3d 995 (2015).

92016–2025
San Juan County v. No New Gas Tax green
wash · 2007
2 sentences

2019Such a dismissal is appropriate *586 where "there is not only an absence of facts set out in the complaint to support a claim of relief, but there is no hypothetical set of facts that could conceivably be raised by the complaint to support a legally sufficient claim." Worthington v. Westnet, 182 Wash.2d 500 , 505, 341 P.3d 995 (2015) (citing No New Gas Tax, 160 Wash.2d at 164 , 157 P.3d 831 ).

2019Such a dismissal is appropriate *586 where "there is not only an absence of facts set out in the complaint to support a claim of relief, but there is no hypothetical set of facts that could conceivably be raised by the complaint to support a legally sufficient claim." Worthington v. Westnet, 182 Wash.2d 500 , 505, 341 P.3d 995 (2015) (citing No New Gas Tax, 160 Wash.2d at 164 , 157 P.3d 831 ).

52015–2019
Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Services green
wash · 1998
2 sentences

2019Given this high standard, CR 12(b)(6) motions should be granted " 'sparingly and with care' " where "plaintiff's allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief." No New Gas Tax, 160 Wash.2d at 164 , 157 P.3d 831 (quoting Tenore v. AT &T Wireless Servs., 136 Wash.2d 322 , 330, 962 P.2d 104 (1998) ).

2019Given this high standard, CR 12(b)(6) motions should be granted " 'sparingly and with care' " where "plaintiff's allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief." No New Gas Tax, 160 Wash.2d at 164 , 157 P.3d 831 (quoting Tenore v. AT &T Wireless Servs., 136 Wash.2d 322 , 330, 962 P.2d 104 (1998) ).

22019–2019

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 42u.s.c.1983 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 36.01.010 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 36.32.120 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 39.34.030 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.08.120 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.010 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.030 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.080 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check