Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Wisconsin opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McCrossengreen2 sentences2014State v. McCrossen, 129 Wis. 2d 277, 287 , 385 N.W.2d 161 (1986). 2014State v. McCrossen, 129 Wis. 2d 277, 287 , 385 N.W.2d 161 (1986). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Leopoldo R. Salas Gaytongreen1 sentence2025The circuit court, reaching these same conclusions, properly exercised its discretion in its award of fees; this was “a reasonable conclusion, based upon a consideration of the appropriate law and facts of record.” See Salas Gayton, 370 Wis. 2d 264, ¶20 (citation omitted). ¶46 The Village also seeks a reduction of the attorney fees for the time expended on preparing the motion for attorney fees. | 1 | 1 |
Minnesota v. Olsongreen1 sentence2023Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 96-97 (1990) (holding that a person’s “status as an overnight guest is alone enough to show that he had an expectation of privacy in the home that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable”). ¶19 Under Wisconsin law, this court has formulated an alternate analysis when “the person challenging the search claims status as a guest on the property.” State v. Fox, 2008 WI App 136, ¶19 , 314 Wis. 2d 84 , 758 N.W.2d 790 . | 1 | 1 |
Douglas v. Deweygreen2 sentences2020See Douglas v. Dewey, 154 Wis. 2d 451, 467 , 453 N.W.2d 500 (Ct. App. 1990); see also Air Wisconsin, Inc. v. North Cent. 2020See Douglas v. Dewey, 154 Wis. 2d 451, 467 , 453 N.W.2d 500 (Ct. App. 1990); see also Air Wisconsin, Inc. v. North Cent. | 1 | 1 |
In Matter of Suspension of Operating Privilege of Bardwellgreen2 sentences2010See Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (5)(a); City of Madison v. Bardwell, 83 Wis. 2d 891, 896 , 266 N.W.2d 618 (1978) ("Only if [the defendant] submits to the designated test may he [or she] have an alternate test and still comply with the law."). 2010See Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (5)(a); City of Madison v. Bardwell, 83 Wis. 2d 891, 896 , 266 N.W.2d 618 (1978) ("Only if [the defendant] submits to the designated test may he [or she] have an alternate test and still comply with the law."). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Trecrocigreen1 sentence2008See Trecroci, 246 Wis. 2d 261, ¶¶ 56-60 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Renardgreen1 sentence2005See id. at 460 . | 1 | 1 |
Vortis v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1999See State v. McCrossen, 129 Wis. 2d 277 , 385 N.W.2d 161 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 (1986); State v. Walstad, 119 Wis. 2d 483 , 351 N.W.2d 469 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Fox
green
2 sentences2023Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 96-97 (1990) (holding that a person’s “status as an overnight guest is alone enough to show that he had an expectation of privacy in the home that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable”). ¶19 Under Wisconsin law, this court has formulated an alternate analysis when “the person challenging the search claims status as a guest on the property.” State v. Fox, 2008 WI App 136, ¶19 , 314 Wis. 2d 84 , 758 N.W.2d 790 . 2023Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 96-97 (1990) (holding that a person’s “status as an overnight guest is alone enough to show that he had an expectation of privacy in the home that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable”). ¶19 Under Wisconsin law, this court has formulated an alternate analysis when “the person challenging the search claims status as a guest on the property.” State v. Fox, 2008 WI App 136, ¶19 , 314 Wis. 2d 84 , 758 N.W.2d 790 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Hubanks
green
2 sentences2010More recently, in State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis. 2d 1, 28-29 , 496 N.W.2d 96 (Ct. App. 1992), we refused to use our Wis. Stat. § 752.35 discretionary reversal power to enable a defendant to present an alternate defense merely because the defense presented during the trial proved ineffective. 2010More recently, in State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis. 2d 1, 28-29 , 496 N.W.2d 96 (Ct. App. 1992), we refused to use our Wis. Stat. § 752.35 discretionary reversal power to enable a defendant to present an alternate defense merely because the defense presented during the trial proved ineffective. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Stary
green
2 sentences2010However, because the choice of who pays for and arranges the alternate test is the defendant's, law enforcement must be prepared to offer either the second test at agency expense or a reasonable opportunity for a test at the suspect's expense, in addition to paying for the first test — hence the term "three obligations" that was used by the Stary court. 4 See Stary, 187 Wis. 2d at 270 . ¶ 12. 2010However, because the choice of who pays for and arranges the alternate test is the defendant's, law enforcement must be prepared to offer either the second test at agency expense or a reasonable opportunity for a test at the suspect's expense, in addition to paying for the first test — hence the term "three obligations" that was used by the Stary court. 4 See Stary, 187 Wis. 2d at 270 . ¶ 12. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences2008Gonzalez relies on State v. Smith, 2006 WI 74 , 291 Wis. 2d 569 , 716 N.W.2d 482 , to support his argument that the trial court's designation of Juror Molenda as an alternate was in error because she showed no bias toward him. 2008Gonzalez relies on State v. Smith, 2006 WI 74 , 291 Wis. 2d 569 , 716 N.W.2d 482 , to support his argument that the trial court's designation of Juror Molenda as an alternate was in error because she showed no bias toward him. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Walstad
green
2 sentences1999This alternate test is critical, because it affords the defendant "the opportunity to scrutinize and verify or impeach the results of the [initial] test administered by enforcement authorities." Walstad, 119 Wis. 2d at 527 , 351 N.W.2d at 491 . 1999This alternate test is critical, because it affords the defendant "the opportunity to scrutinize and verify or impeach the results of the [initial] test administered by enforcement authorities." Walstad, 119 Wis. 2d at 527 , 351 N.W.2d at 491 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Vincent
green
2 sentences1994Vincent, 171 Wis. 2d at 127 , 490 N.W.2d at 763 . 2 Law enforcement may designate one of those two as its primary test. *270 Once a person consents to the primary test requested by law enforcement, he or she is permitted, at his or her request, an alternate test the agency chooses or, alternatively, a reasonable opportunity to a test of his or her choice. 1994Vincent, 171 Wis. 2d at 127 , 490 N.W.2d at 763 . 2 Law enforcement may designate one of those two as its primary test. *270 Once a person consents to the primary test requested by law enforcement, he or she is permitted, at his or her request, an alternate test the agency chooses or, alternatively, a reasonable opportunity to a test of his or her choice. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Schmerber v. California
green
1 sentence1992Id. at 760 n.4. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
cluster 560582
green
1 sentence1992Hammer, 932 F.2d at 846 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.