recognized hearsay exception (Wisconsin) · Go Syfert
← Wisconsin issues

recognized hearsay exception in Wisconsin

12 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Bauergreen
wis · 1982 · cited in 8 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1984–2003
2 sentences

1995"If the evidence does not fit within a recognized hearsay exception, it must be excluded." Id.

1995"If the evidence does not fit within a recognized hearsay exception, it must be excluded." Id.

28
Bruton v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1968 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
1 sentence

2002Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 137 (1968); Bauer, 109 Wis. 2d at 210 .

11
Scotto v. Dilbert Bros.green
nyappdiv · 1942 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See, e.g., Kalos v. United States, 9 F.2d 268, 271 (8th Cir. 1925); Indian Fred v. State, 282 P. 930, 933-34 (Ariz. 1929); Garcia v. State, 68 N.W.2d 151, 158-59 (Neb. 1955); Scotto v. Dilbert Bros., Inc., 33 N.Y.S.2d 835, 836 (N.Y.

11
Kalos v. United Statesgreen
ca8 · 1925 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See, e.g., Kalos v. United States, 9 F.2d 268, 271 (8th Cir. 1925); Indian Fred v. State, 282 P. 930, 933-34 (Ariz. 1929); Garcia v. State, 68 N.W.2d 151, 158-59 (Neb. 1955); Scotto v. Dilbert Bros., Inc., 33 N.Y.S.2d 835, 836 (N.Y.

11
Garcia v. Stategreen
neb · 1955 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See, e.g., Kalos v. United States, 9 F.2d 268, 271 (8th Cir. 1925); Indian Fred v. State, 282 P. 930, 933-34 (Ariz. 1929); Garcia v. State, 68 N.W.2d 151, 158-59 (Neb. 1955); Scotto v. Dilbert Bros., Inc., 33 N.Y.S.2d 835, 836 (N.Y.

11
Indian Fred v. Stategreen
ariz · 1929 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See, e.g., Kalos v. United States, 9 F.2d 268, 271 (8th Cir. 1925); Indian Fred v. State, 282 P. 930, 933-34 (Ariz. 1929); Garcia v. State, 68 N.W.2d 151, 158-59 (Neb. 1955); Scotto v. Dilbert Bros., Inc., 33 N.Y.S.2d 835, 836 (N.Y.

11
State v. Martinezgreen
wis · 1989 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992The constitutional issue of confrontation is not reached, however, unless the out-of-court statement is admissible under a recognized hearsay exception, Rules 908.03 and 908.045, Stats., or a hearsay exclusion, Rule 908.01(4), Stats. 3 See State v. Martinez, 150 Wis. 2d 62, 70 , 440 N.W.2d 783, 786 (1989).

1992The constitutional issue of confrontation is not reached, however, unless the out-of-court statement is admissible under a recognized hearsay exception, Rules 908.03 and 908.045, Stats., or a hearsay exclusion, Rule 908.01(4), Stats. 3 See State v. Martinez, 150 Wis. 2d 62, 70 , 440 N.W.2d 783, 786 (1989).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Crawford v. Washington green
scotus · 2004
1 sentence

2018Crawford v. Washington , 541 U.S. 36 , 68-69 (2004).

12018–2018
Mitchell v. State green
wis · 1978
2 sentences

2000The State relies upon Mitchell v. State, 84 Wis. 2d 325 , 267 N.W.2d 349 (1978), and State v. Gilles, 173 Wis. 2d 101 , 496 N.W.2d 133 (Ct. App. 1992), to support this argument. ¶ 22.

2000The State relies upon Mitchell v. State, 84 Wis. 2d 325 , 267 N.W.2d 349 (1978), and State v. Gilles, 173 Wis. 2d 101 , 496 N.W.2d 133 (Ct. App. 1992), to support this argument. ¶ 22.

12000–2000
State v. Gilles green
wisctapp · 1992
2 sentences

2000The State relies upon Mitchell v. State, 84 Wis. 2d 325 , 267 N.W.2d 349 (1978), and State v. Gilles, 173 Wis. 2d 101 , 496 N.W.2d 133 (Ct. App. 1992), to support this argument. ¶ 22.

2000The State relies upon Mitchell v. State, 84 Wis. 2d 325 , 267 N.W.2d 349 (1978), and State v. Gilles, 173 Wis. 2d 101 , 496 N.W.2d 133 (Ct. App. 1992), to support this argument. ¶ 22.

12000–2000
State v. Nelson green
wis · 1987
1 sentence

1989Nelson, 138 Wis. 2d at 429-30 ; State v. Bauer, 109 Wis. 2d 204, 215 , 325 N.W.2d 857 (1982).

11989–1989

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WI § Wis. Stat. § 908.045 (8) WI § Wis. Stat. § 908.03 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 908.04 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WI 12 (1984–2018) DC 10 (1981–2014) MO 10 (2012–2022) MI 5 (1971–2015) NY 5 (2002–2024) WA 5 (1983–2016) NJ 4 (2008–2025) OR 4 (1992–2024) PA 4 (2004–2025) CO 4 (1985–2012) ID 3 (2015–2023) TN 3 (1977–2006) NM 3 (1996–2014) KS 3 (2007–2009) TX 3 (1997–2018) CA 3 (1985–2009) IN 2 (2003–2006) VA 2 (1991–2006) MA 2 (2009–2013) MS 2 (2002–2004) HI 2 (2003–2005) CT 2 (1994–1995) RI 2 (2001–2011) NV 2 (1997–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check