Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 California opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
San Bernardino County Children & Family Services v. Kimberly L.green2 sentences2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 2021(In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239-1240 (A.A.).) “Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule, to substantively address the specific issues challenged, or to support that challenge by an adequate record shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to this section.” (§ 366.26, subd. (l)(2).) “ ‘When the court orders a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, the court must advise all parties and, if present, the child’s parent, guardian, or adult relative, that if the party wish | 2 | 2 |
Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. F.S.green2 sentences2023(See § 366.26, subd. (l)(3); [Cal. Rules of Court,] rules 8.450, 8.452; see also [Cal. Rules of Court,] rule 8.403(b)(1).)” (In re A.H. (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 337, 347 .) “Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule, to substantively address the specific issues challenged, or to support that challenge by an adequate record shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to this section.” (§ 366.26, subd. (l)(2).) Notice of the parent’s right to writ review of the setting order “must be given orally to those pr 2016(Z)(3); rules 8.450, 8.452; see also rule 8.403(b)(1).)” (In re A.H. (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 337, 346 [ 159 Cal.Rptr.3d 891 ].) “Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule, to substantively address the specific issues challenged, or to support that challenge by an adequate record shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to this section.” (§ 366.26, subd. | 2 | 2 |
Anthony D. v. Sup. Ct. of Orange Cty.green2 sentences1999Section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) provides in relevant part: "( l )(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following applies: "(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. "(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. "(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. (2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the peri 1999Section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) provides in relevant part: "( l )(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following applies: "(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. "(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. "(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. (2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the peri | 2 | 2 |
Steve J. v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1999Section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) provides in relevant part: "( l )(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following applies: "(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. "(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. "(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. (2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the peri 1999Section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) provides in relevant part: "( l )(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following applies: "(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. "(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. "(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. (2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the peri | 2 | 2 |
JOYCE G. v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences2023Section 366.26, subdivision (l) provides the following: “(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following apply: “(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. “(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. “(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. “(2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specifie 1999Section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) provides in relevant part: "( l )(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following applies: "(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. "(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. "(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. (2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the peri | 1 | 3 |
In Re SBgreen2 sentences2026Reunification Services “[A]n unappealed disposition or postdisposition order is final and binding and may not be attacked on an appeal from a later appealable order.” [Citation.]’ [Citations.]” (In re S.B. (2009) 46 Cal.4th 529 , 532.) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule, . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 .) Father failed to file an appeal from the order terminating his reunification services on Octo 2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 | 1 | 2 |
WANDA B. v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1999Section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) provides in relevant part: "( l )(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following applies: "(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. "(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. "(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. (2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the peri 1999Section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) provides in relevant part: "( l )(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following applies: "(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. "(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. "(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. (2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the peri | 1 | 2 |
Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. C.K.green1 sentence2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 | 1 | 1 |
S.Y. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.green1 sentence2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 | 1 | 1 |
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Jonathan A.green1 sentence2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tulare County Health & Human Services Agency v. Travis H.
green
2 sentences2026Reunification Services “[A]n unappealed disposition or postdisposition order is final and binding and may not be attacked on an appeal from a later appealable order.” [Citation.]’ [Citations.]” (In re S.B. (2009) 46 Cal.4th 529 , 532.) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule, . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 .) Father failed to file an appeal from the order terminating his reunification services on Octo 2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 | 2 | 2024–2026 |
In Re Harry N.
green
2 sentences2015One such exception is found in Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.28 (section 366.28), which, as relevant here, provides: “(b)(1) After parental rights have been terminated pursuant to Section 366.26, an order by the court that a dependent child is to reside in, be retained in, or be removed from a specific placement, is not appealable at any time unless all of the following apply: “(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. “(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. “ 2015One such exception is found in Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.28 (section 366.28), which, as relevant here, provides: “(b)(1) After parental rights have been terminated pursuant to Section 366.26, an order by the court that a dependent child is to reside in, be retained in, or be removed from a specific placement, is not appealable at any time unless all of the following apply: “(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. “(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. “ | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Stanislaus Cty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Sonya G.
green
2 sentences1999Section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) provides in relevant part: "( l )(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following applies: "(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. "(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. "(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. (2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the peri 1999Section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) provides in relevant part: "( l )(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following applies: "(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. "(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. "(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. (2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the peri | 2 | 1999–1999 |
In Re Hunter S.
green
1 sentence2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Christopher D. v. Superior Court
green
1 sentence2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Michael W.
green
1 sentence2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. San Bernardino Cnty. Children v. B.F. (In re J.F.)
green
1 sentence2024(Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.695(f)(6), 8.450(e)(4)(A) & (B).) “‘[T]he timely filing of an appropriate notice of appeal or its legal equivalent is an absolute prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. [Citations.]’” (In re J.F. (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 70, 74-75 .) “‘Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to [section 366.26.]’ [Citation.]” (In re Hannah D. (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 662, 678 ; accord, In re A.A. (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In Re Lauren Z.
green
1 sentence2023(In re Frank R. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 532, 539 ; In re Lauren Z. (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1102, 1110 ; In re Harmony B. (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 831, 838-839 ; In re Maria S. (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 1032, 1038 ; In re 7 Undesignated rules references are to the California Rules of Court. 9 Rashad B. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 442, 450 ; In re Cathina W. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 716, 722-726 .) It is the parent’s burden to show good cause for failure to file a notice of intent and request for record and a writ petition pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (l). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Harmony B.
green
1 sentence2023(In re Frank R. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 532, 539 ; In re Lauren Z. (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1102, 1110 ; In re Harmony B. (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 831, 838-839 ; In re Maria S. (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 1032, 1038 ; In re 7 Undesignated rules references are to the California Rules of Court. 9 Rashad B. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 442, 450 ; In re Cathina W. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 716, 722-726 .) It is the parent’s burden to show good cause for failure to file a notice of intent and request for record and a writ petition pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (l). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Maria S.
green
1 sentence2023(In re Frank R. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 532, 539 ; In re Lauren Z. (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1102, 1110 ; In re Harmony B. (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 831, 838-839 ; In re Maria S. (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 1032, 1038 ; In re 7 Undesignated rules references are to the California Rules of Court. 9 Rashad B. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 442, 450 ; In re Cathina W. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 716, 722-726 .) It is the parent’s burden to show good cause for failure to file a notice of intent and request for record and a writ petition pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (l). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Merrick
green
1 sentence2023Section 366.26, subdivision (l) provides the following: “(1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the following apply: “(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely manner. “(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record. “(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits. “(2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specifie | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Frank R.
green
1 sentence2023(In re Frank R. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 532, 539 ; In re Lauren Z. (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1102, 1110 ; In re Harmony B. (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 831, 838-839 ; In re Maria S. (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 1032, 1038 ; In re 7 Undesignated rules references are to the California Rules of Court. 9 Rashad B. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 442, 450 ; In re Cathina W. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 716, 722-726 .) It is the parent’s burden to show good cause for failure to file a notice of intent and request for record and a writ petition pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (l). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Rashad B.
green
1 sentence2023(In re Frank R. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 532, 539 ; In re Lauren Z. (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1102, 1110 ; In re Harmony B. (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 831, 838-839 ; In re Maria S. (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 1032, 1038 ; In re 7 Undesignated rules references are to the California Rules of Court. 9 Rashad B. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 442, 450 ; In re Cathina W. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 716, 722-726 .) It is the parent’s burden to show good cause for failure to file a notice of intent and request for record and a writ petition pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (l). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Cathina W. v. Bessie W.
green
1 sentence2023(In re Frank R. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 532, 539 ; In re Lauren Z. (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1102, 1110 ; In re Harmony B. (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 831, 838-839 ; In re Maria S. (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 1032, 1038 ; In re 7 Undesignated rules references are to the California Rules of Court. 9 Rashad B. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 442, 450 ; In re Cathina W. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 716, 722-726 .) It is the parent’s burden to show good cause for failure to file a notice of intent and request for record and a writ petition pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (l). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
CRESSE S. v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences1997(See Cresse S. v. Superior Court (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 947 [ 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 56 ].) Petitioners’ concern arises from the language of subdivision (l)(2) of section 366.26: “Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to this section” (Italics added.) In major part, the provisions of section 366.26 concern the conduct of proceedings at which the juvenile court will select one of several permanency planning alternatives, which include guardianship and adoption 1997(See Cresse S. v. Superior Court (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 947 [ 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 56 ].) Petitioners’ concern arises from the language of subdivision (l)(2) of section 366.26: “Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rule . . . shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings and orders made pursuant to this section” (Italics added.) In major part, the provisions of section 366.26 concern the conduct of proceedings at which the juvenile court will select one of several permanency planning alternatives, which include guardianship and adoption | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.