jury a cautionary instruction (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

jury a cautionary instruction in Connecticut

11 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Davidsongreen
connappct · 2000 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004See State v. Davidson, 57 Conn. App. 541 , 543 n.3, 750 A.2d 1106 (2000). 9 The court instructed the jury as follows: “Eyewitness testimony.

2004See State v. Davidson, 57 Conn. App. 541 , 543 n.3, 750 A.2d 1106 (2000). 9 The court instructed the jury as follows: “Eyewitness testimony.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Wragg green
connappct · 2001
2 sentences

2016When subsequent events reveal that it was an imprudent choice, however, the defendant is not entitled to turn the clock back and have [the appellate court] reverse the judgment because the trial court did not, sua sponte, strike the testimony and give the jury a cautionary instruction." (Citations omitted.) State v. Wragg , 61 Conn.App. 394 , 399, 764 A.2d 216 (2001)(no plain error for the court to refrain from striking, sua sponte, the constancy of accusation testimony).

2016When subsequent events reveal that it was an imprudent choice, however, the defendant is not entitled to turn the clock back and have [the appellate court] reverse the judgment because the trial court did not, sua sponte, strike the testimony and give the jury a cautionary instruction." (Citations omitted.) State v. Wragg , 61 Conn.App. 394 , 399, 764 A.2d 216 (2001)(no plain error for the court to refrain from striking, sua sponte, the constancy of accusation testimony).

42001–2016
State v. Quail green
conn · 2016
1 sentence

2020When subsequent events reveal that it was an imprudent choice, however, the defendant is not entitled to turn the clock back and have [the appellate court] reverse the judgment because the trial court did not, sua sponte, strike the testimony and give the jury a cautionary instruction.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Elias V., 168 Conn. App. 321, 335 , 147 A.3d 1102 , cert. denied, 323 Conn. 938 , 151 A.3d 386 (2016).

12020–2020
State v. Elias V. green
conn · 2016
1 sentence

2020When subsequent events reveal that it was an imprudent choice, however, the defendant is not entitled to turn the clock back and have [the appellate court] reverse the judgment because the trial court did not, sua sponte, strike the testimony and give the jury a cautionary instruction.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Elias V., 168 Conn. App. 321, 335 , 147 A.3d 1102 , cert. denied, 323 Conn. 938 , 151 A.3d 386 (2016).

12020–2020
State v. Elias V. green
connappct · 2016
2 sentences

2020When subsequent events reveal that it was an imprudent choice, however, the defendant is not entitled to turn the clock back and have [the appellate court] reverse the judgment because the trial court did not, sua sponte, strike the testimony and give the jury a cautionary instruction.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Elias V., 168 Conn. App. 321, 335 , 147 A.3d 1102 , cert. denied, 323 Conn. 938 , 151 A.3d 386 (2016).

2020When subsequent events reveal that it was an imprudent choice, however, the defendant is not entitled to turn the clock back and have [the appellate court] reverse the judgment because the trial court did not, sua sponte, strike the testimony and give the jury a cautionary instruction.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Elias V., 168 Conn. App. 321, 335 , 147 A.3d 1102 , cert. denied, 323 Conn. 938 , 151 A.3d 386 (2016).

12020–2020
State v. Nunes green
conn · 2002
2 sentences

2003Nor can such evidence be used to suggest that the defendant has a bad character or a propensity for criminal behavior.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Nunes, 260 Conn. 649, 684 , 800 A.2d 1160 (2002); see also Conn. Code Evid. § 4-5 (a).

2003Nor can such evidence be used to suggest that the defendant has a bad character or a propensity for criminal behavior.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Nunes, 260 Conn. 649, 684 , 800 A.2d 1160 (2002); see also Conn. Code Evid. § 4-5 (a).

12003–2003
State v. Kulmac green
conn · 1994
2 sentences

2002State v. Kulmac, 230 Conn. 43, 60 , 644 A.2d 887 (1994).

2002State v. Kulmac, 230 Conn. 43, 60 , 644 A.2d 887 (1994).

12002–2002
Best Buy Warehouse v. Best Buy Co. green
scotus · 1991
1 sentence

2001No limiting instruction was given at the time [of the offending] remark and none was required because none was requested.” Id.

12001–2001
State v. Marshall green
conn · 1974
2 sentences

1991State v. Baker, 182 Conn. 52, 59 , 437 A.2d 843 (1980); State v. Marshall, 166 Conn. 593, 599-600 , 353 A.2d 756 (1974).

1991State v. Baker, 182 Conn. 52, 59 , 437 A.2d 843 (1980); State v. Marshall, 166 Conn. 593, 599-600 , 353 A.2d 756 (1974).

11991–1991
State v. Baker green
conn · 1980
2 sentences

1991State v. Baker, 182 Conn. 52, 59 , 437 A.2d 843 (1980); State v. Marshall, 166 Conn. 593, 599-600 , 353 A.2d 756 (1974).

1991State v. Baker, 182 Conn. 52, 59 , 437 A.2d 843 (1980); State v. Marshall, 166 Conn. 593, 599-600 , 353 A.2d 756 (1974).

11991–1991
State v. Kirschenbaum green
conn · 1929
2 sentences

1974State v. Frost, 105 Conn. 326, 338 , 135 Atl. 446 .” State v. Kirschenbaum, 109 Conn. 394, 409 , 146 A. 837 .

1974State v. Frost, 105 Conn. 326, 338 , 135 Atl. 446 .” State v. Kirschenbaum, 109 Conn. 394, 409 , 146 A. 837 .

11974–1974
State v. Frost green
conn · 1926
2 sentences

1974State v. Frost, 105 Conn. 326, 338 , 135 Atl. 446 .” State v. Kirschenbaum, 109 Conn. 394, 409 , 146 A. 837 .

1974State v. Frost, 105 Conn. 326, 338 , 135 Atl. 446 .” State v. Kirschenbaum, 109 Conn. 394, 409 , 146 A. 837 .

11974–1974

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-86e (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-21 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-70 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-73a (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 11 (1964–2026) CT 11 (1974–2020) MN 8 (1971–2018) ND 6 (1950–2015) AZ 5 (1965–1994) IA 5 (1924–2019) WI 5 (1977–2020) OK 4 (1958–2006) MT 4 (1994–2020) WV 3 (1991–2014) GA 3 (1995–2018) MI 3 (1980–2024) OH 3 (2003–2024) MO 3 (1903–1938) RI 3 (1992–2021) VA 3 (1993–2022) UT 3 (1991–2002) KS 2 (1995–2022) MA 2 (2002–2005) IL 2 (1998–1998) AK 2 (1986–1986) OR 2 (2023–2023) CA 2 (2009–2020) IN 2 (1983–2017) WA 2 (1987–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check