Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.
green
2 sentences2020The essence of a false light privacy claim is that the matter published concerning the [claimant] (1) is not true . . . and (2) is such a major misrepresentation of [her] character, history, activities or beliefs that serious offense may reasonably be expected to be taken by a reasonable [person] in [her] position.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc., 188 Conn. 107, 131 , 448 A.2d 1317 (1982). 2020The essence of a false light privacy claim is that the matter published concerning the [claimant] (1) is not true . . . and (2) is such a major misrepresentation of [her] character, history, activities or beliefs that serious offense may reasonably be expected to be taken by a reasonable [person] in [her] position.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc., 188 Conn. 107, 131 , 448 A.2d 1317 (1982). | 7 | 1993–2020 |
Jonap v. Silver
green
2 sentences2000The essence of a false light privacy claim is that the matter published concerning the plaintiff (1) is not true . . . and (2) is such a major misrepresentation of his character, history, activities or beliefs that serious offense may reasonably be expected to be taken by a reasonable man in his position." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Jonap v. Silver , 1 Conn. App. 550 , 558 , 474 A.2d 800 (1984); Goodrich v. Waterbury American-Republican, Inc. , 188 Conn. 131 . 2000The essence of a false light privacy claim is that the matter published concerning the plaintiff (1) is not true . . . and (2) is such a major misrepresentation of his character, history, activities or beliefs that serious offense may reasonably be expected to be taken by a reasonable man in his position." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Jonap v. Silver , 1 Conn. App. 550 , 558 , 474 A.2d 800 (1984); Goodrich v. Waterbury American-Republican, Inc. , 188 Conn. 131 . | 3 | 1995–2000 |
Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc.
green
1 sentence2000Inc., supra. 1 The plaintiff's complaint with respect to the false light privacy claim merely alleges that the plaintiff "at no time" consented to the use of her likeness on the billboards. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.