Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1995–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ross
green
2 sentences2002I BURDEN OF PROOF AND STANDARD OF REVIEW “In our assessment of whether the statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 236 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L. 2002I BURDEN OF PROOF AND STANDARD OF REVIEW “In our assessment of whether the statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 236 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L. | 6 | 1995–2002 |
Harris v. Schaefer
green
2 sentences2002I BURDEN OF PROOF AND STANDARD OF REVIEW “In our assessment of whether the statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 236 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L. 1998“In our assessment of whether the statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that ‘ [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.’ ” State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 236 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L. | 5 | 1995–2002 |
Njoku v. Schmidt
green
2 sentences2002I BURDEN OF PROOF AND STANDARD OF REVIEW “In our assessment of whether the statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 236 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L. 1998“In our assessment of whether the statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that ‘ [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.’ ” State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 236 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L. | 4 | 1997–2002 |
State v. Gurreh
green
2 sentences2001In State v. Gurreh, supra, 60 Conn. App. 175 -76, the court stated the constitutional review standard as follows: Our Supreme Court has opined that "[i]n our assessment of whether the statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted CT Page 4025 statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute's constitutionality. . . . 2001The void-for-vagueness doctrine "embodies two central precepts: the right to fair warning of the effect of a governing statute or regulation and the guarantee against standardless law enforcement." State v. Gurreh, 60 Conn. App. 166 , 175 , ___ A.2d ___ (2000), cert. den. 255 Conn. 916 (2000). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Keystone Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
1 sentence2024Ed. 2d 316 (1999). ‘‘Where a statute is challenged as being unconstitutional on its face, the burden is especially heavy.’’ State v. Ryan, 48 Conn. App. 148, 154 , 709 A.2d 21 , cert. denied 244 Conn. 930 , 711 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 876 , 119 S. Ct. 179 , 142 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Rodriguez v. United States Postal Service
green
1 sentence2024Ed. 2d 316 (1999). ‘‘Where a statute is challenged as being unconstitutional on its face, the burden is especially heavy.’’ State v. Ryan, 48 Conn. App. 148, 154 , 709 A.2d 21 , cert. denied 244 Conn. 930 , 711 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 876 , 119 S. Ct. 179 , 142 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Smith v. Hunton
green
1 sentence2024Ed. 2d 316 (1999). ‘‘Where a statute is challenged as being unconstitutional on its face, the burden is especially heavy.’’ State v. Ryan, 48 Conn. App. 148, 154 , 709 A.2d 21 , cert. denied 244 Conn. 930 , 711 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 876 , 119 S. Ct. 179 , 142 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Watson
green
1 sentence2024Ed. 2d 316 (1999). ‘‘Where a statute is challenged as being unconstitutional on its face, the burden is especially heavy.’’ State v. Ryan, 48 Conn. App. 148, 154 , 709 A.2d 21 , cert. denied 244 Conn. 930 , 711 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 876 , 119 S. Ct. 179 , 142 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Iverson
green
1 sentence2024Ed. 2d 316 (1999). ‘‘Where a statute is challenged as being unconstitutional on its face, the burden is especially heavy.’’ State v. Ryan, 48 Conn. App. 148, 154 , 709 A.2d 21 , cert. denied 244 Conn. 930 , 711 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 876 , 119 S. Ct. 179 , 142 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Jason B.
green
2 sentences2024Our Supreme Court has stated that, ‘‘[i]n our assessment of whether [a] statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutional- ity beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jason B., 248 Conn. 543, 556 , 729 A.2d 760 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S. Ct. 406 , 145 L. 2024Our Supreme Court has stated that, ‘‘[i]n our assessment of whether [a] statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutional- ity beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jason B., 248 Conn. 543, 556 , 729 A.2d 760 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S. Ct. 406 , 145 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Ryan
green
2 sentences2024Ed. 2d 316 (1999). ‘‘Where a statute is challenged as being unconstitutional on its face, the burden is especially heavy.’’ State v. Ryan, 48 Conn. App. 148, 154 , 709 A.2d 21 , cert. denied 244 Conn. 930 , 711 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 876 , 119 S. Ct. 179 , 142 L. 2024Ed. 2d 316 (1999). ‘‘Where a statute is challenged as being unconstitutional on its face, the burden is especially heavy.’’ State v. Ryan, 48 Conn. App. 148, 154 , 709 A.2d 21 , cert. denied 244 Conn. 930 , 711 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 876 , 119 S. Ct. 179 , 142 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Johnson v. United States
green
1 sentence2024Our Supreme Court has stated that, ‘‘[i]n our assessment of whether [a] statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutional- ity beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jason B., 248 Conn. 543, 556 , 729 A.2d 760 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S. Ct. 406 , 145 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Willett v. City University of New York
green
1 sentence2024Our Supreme Court has stated that, ‘‘[i]n our assessment of whether [a] statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutional- ity beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jason B., 248 Conn. 543, 556 , 729 A.2d 760 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S. Ct. 406 , 145 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Liggins v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
green
1 sentence2024Our Supreme Court has stated that, ‘‘[i]n our assessment of whether [a] statute passes constitutional muster, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutional- ity beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jason B., 248 Conn. 543, 556 , 729 A.2d 760 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 967 , 120 S. Ct. 406 , 145 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Ball
green
2 sentences2004The burden of proving unconstitutionality is especially heavy when, as at this juncture, a statute is challenged as being unconstitutional on its face.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ball, 260 Conn. 275, 280-81 , 796 A.2d 542 (2002). 2004The burden of proving unconstitutionality is especially heavy when, as at this juncture, a statute is challenged as being unconstitutional on its face.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ball, 260 Conn. 275, 280-81 , 796 A.2d 542 (2002). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Thalheim v. Town of Greenwich
green
2 sentences2002“In analyzing this claim, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Thalheim v. Greenwich, 256 Conn. 628, 640 , 775 A.2d 947 (2001). 2002“In analyzing this claim, we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Thalheim v. Greenwich, 256 Conn. 628, 640 , 775 A.2d 947 (2001). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Payne
green
2 sentences2001In analyzing this claim, “we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption, in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Payne, 240 Conn. 766, 777 , 695 A.2d 525 (1997). 2001In analyzing this claim, “we proceed from the well recognized jurisprudential principle that [t]he party attacking a validly enacted statute . . . bears the heavy burden of proving its unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt and we indulge in every presumption, in favor of the statute’s constitutionality.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Payne, 240 Conn. 766, 777 , 695 A.2d 525 (1997). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.
green
1 sentence2001The void-for-vagueness doctrine "embodies two central precepts: the right to fair warning of the effect of a governing statute or regulation and the guarantee against standardless law enforcement." State v. Gurreh, 60 Conn. App. 166 , 175 , ___ A.2d ___ (2000), cert. den. 255 Conn. 916 (2000). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.