Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1986–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mercer v. Commissioner of Correctiongreen1 sentence2000See also Mercer v. Commissioner of Corrections, 230 Conn. 88 , (1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2001Ed. 2d 550 (1986). “[A]n ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Mims, supra, 61 Conn. App. 409 , quoting State v. Laracuente, 57 Conn. App. 91, 97 , 749 A.2d 34 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 923 , 754 A.2d 798 (2000). 2001“As our Supreme Court has stated [in State v. Leecan, supra, 542 ], an ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Laracuente, 57 Conn. App. 91, 97 , 749 A.2d 34 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 923 , 754 A.2d 798 (2000). | 3 | 2000–2001 |
State v. Laracuente
green
2 sentences2001Ed. 2d 550 (1986). “[A]n ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Mims, supra, 61 Conn. App. 409 , quoting State v. Laracuente, 57 Conn. App. 91, 97 , 749 A.2d 34 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 923 , 754 A.2d 798 (2000). 2001“As our Supreme Court has stated [in State v. Leecan, supra, 542 ], an ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Laracuente, 57 Conn. App. 91, 97 , 749 A.2d 34 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 923 , 754 A.2d 798 (2000). | 3 | 2000–2001 |
State v. Laracuente
green
2 sentences2001“As our Supreme Court has stated [in State v. Leecan, supra, 542 ], an ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Laracuente, 57 Conn. App. 91, 97 , 749 A.2d 34 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 923 , 754 A.2d 798 (2000). 2001“As our Supreme Court has stated [in State v. Leecan, supra, 542 ], an ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Laracuente, 57 Conn. App. 91, 97 , 749 A.2d 34 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 923 , 754 A.2d 798 (2000). | 3 | 2000–2001 |
State v. Flowers
green
2 sentences2001The basis for the preference of raising ineffective claims in a habeas proceeding instead of on direct appeal, even if there is support for such a claim in the record, is that "ineffective assistance claims of error should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify." State v. Leecan , supra, 198 Conn. 542 . 1997As our Supreme Court has stated, an ineffective assistance claim “should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testily.” State v. Leecan, supra, 198 Conn. 542 . | 2 | 1997–2001 |
State v. Leecan
green
2 sentences1997Though we have resolved his other claims of error, we believe that his ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify." (internal quotations omitted) State v. Leecan , 198 Conn. 517 , 541 , 504 A.2d 480 (1986)). 1997Though we have resolved his other claims of error, we believe that his ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify." (internal quotations omitted) State v. Leecan , 198 Conn. 517 , 541 , 504 A.2d 480 (1986)). | 2 | 1986–1997 |
State v. Williamson
green
1 sentence2000Such a claim is not reviewable on direct appeal but should be "resolved not in a piecemeal fashion but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify." State v. Williamson, 206 Conn. 685 , 706-707 (1988). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1990LAW In order for a petitioner to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, it is necessary that the petitioner meet the criteria established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 , 105 S.Ct. 2052 . 1990LAW In order for a petitioner to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, it is necessary that the petitioner meet the criteria established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 , 105 S.Ct. 2052 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Boyd v. North Carolina
green
1 sentence1990LAW In order for a petitioner to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, it is necessary that the petitioner meet the criteria established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 , 105 S.Ct. 2052 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Casey
green
2 sentences1986Though we have resolved his other claims of error, we believe that his ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify.” Id.; State v. Casey, 201 Conn. 174 , 513 A.2d 1183 (1986). 1986Though we have resolved his other claims of error, we believe that his ineffective assistance claim should be resolved, not in piecemeal fashion, but as a totality after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify.” Id.; State v. Casey, 201 Conn. 174 , 513 A.2d 1183 (1986). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Stevens v. Fulcomer
green
1 sentence1986Id. | 1 | 1986–1986 |