11 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Olafisoye v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2017Moreover, “[fjailure to file a motion to suppress before trial is treated as a waiver of any claim that the evidence was unlawfully seized, .absent a showing of exceptional circumstances.” Olafisoye v. United States, 857 A.2d 1078, 1085 (D.C. 2004) (citation omitted); see also Super. 2017Moreover, “[fjailure to file a motion to suppress before trial is treated as a waiver of any claim that the evidence was unlawfully seized, .absent a showing of exceptional circumstances.” Olafisoye v. United States, 857 A.2d 1078, 1085 (D.C. 2004) (citation omitted); see also Super. | 7 | 7 |
Ebert v. Baltergreen2 sentences1984Paul Mercury Indemnity, supra, 62 Idaho at 447-49 , 112 P.2d at 1016 ; Ebert v. Balter, supra, 83 N.J.Super. at 552-54 , 200 A.2d at 537 (such investigations do not constitute a waiver of any defense); Annot., 38 A.L.R.2d 1148 (1954) (“Liability Insurance: insurer's assumption of or continuation in defense of action brought against the assured as waiver or estoppel as regards defense of non-coverage or other defense existing at time of accident”). 19 . 1984Paul Mercury Indemnity, supra, 62 Idaho at 447-49 , 112 P.2d at 1016 ; Ebert v. Balter, supra, 83 N.J.Super. at 552-54 , 200 A.2d at 537 (such investigations do not constitute a waiver of any defense); Annot., 38 A.L.R.2d 1148 (1954) (“Liability Insurance: insurer's assumption of or continuation in defense of action brought against the assured as waiver or estoppel as regards defense of non-coverage or other defense existing at time of accident”). 19 . | 1 | 1 |
General Electric Credit Corp. v. Security Bank of Washingtongreen1 sentence1975See Seale v. Bates, 145 Colo. 430 , 359 P.2d 356, 359 (1961); cf. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Security Bank, D.C.App., 244 A.2d 920, 923-24, 925 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
Seale v. Batesgreen2 sentences1975See Seale v. Bates, 145 Colo. 430 , 359 P.2d 356, 359 (1961); cf. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Security Bank, D.C.App., 244 A.2d 920, 923-24, 925 (1968). 1975See Seale v. Bates, 145 Colo. 430 , 359 P.2d 356, 359 (1961); cf. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Security Bank, D.C.App., 244 A.2d 920, 923-24, 925 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lisiewski v. Seidel
green
1 sentence2004Id. at 65 ; Super. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
People Ex Rel. Scott v. Silverstein
green
2 sentences1991In support of their argument that the reporter’s privilege is unlike the attorney-client or informant privilege the movants have relied upon the only case they found — People v. Silverstein [ 89 Ill.App.3d 1039 , 45 Ill.Dec. 341 ] 412 N.E.2d 692 (Ill.App.Ct.1980). 1991In support of their argument that the reporter’s privilege is unlike the attorney-client or informant privilege the movants have relied upon the only case they found — People v. Silverstein [ 89 Ill.App.3d 1039 , 45 Ill.Dec. 341 ] 412 N.E.2d 692 (Ill.App.Ct.1980). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Boise Motor Car Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.
green
2 sentences1984Paul Mercury Indemnity, supra, 62 Idaho at 447-49 , 112 P.2d at 1016 ; Ebert v. Balter, supra, 83 N.J.Super. at 552-54 , 200 A.2d at 537 (such investigations do not constitute a waiver of any defense); Annot., 38 A.L.R.2d 1148 (1954) (“Liability Insurance: insurer's assumption of or continuation in defense of action brought against the assured as waiver or estoppel as regards defense of non-coverage or other defense existing at time of accident”). 19 . 1984Paul Mercury Indemnity, supra, 62 Idaho at 447-49 , 112 P.2d at 1016 ; Ebert v. Balter, supra, 83 N.J.Super. at 552-54 , 200 A.2d at 537 (such investigations do not constitute a waiver of any defense); Annot., 38 A.L.R.2d 1148 (1954) (“Liability Insurance: insurer's assumption of or continuation in defense of action brought against the assured as waiver or estoppel as regards defense of non-coverage or other defense existing at time of accident”). 19 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.