6 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1969–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.green2 sentences1998See id. at 216 , 629 P.2d at 292 . {43} In a similar vein, BSA’s approach to discovery was improper. 1998See id. at 216 , 629 P.2d at 292 . {43} In a similar vein, BSA’s approach to discovery was improper. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Archuletagreen2 sentences1986See State v. Archuleta, 82 N.M. 378 , 482 P.2d 242 (Ct.App.1970). 1986See State v. Archuleta, 82 N.M. 378 , 482 P.2d 242 (Ct.App.1970). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hall
green
1 sentence1997Further, the court stated that it viewed the “inaction as a waiver of any claim that the trial court abused its discretion in not granting a continuance.” Id. {46} In this case, the trial court offered defense counsel an opportunity to cross-examine any witness who had been called to testify. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Deutsch v. Flannery
green
1 sentence1995An analogous argument was rejected in Deutsch v. Flannery, 823 F.2d 1361 (9th Cir.1987). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1987Cf. State v. Johnson, 91 N.M. 148 , 571 P.2d 415 (Ct.App. 1977). 1987Cf. State v. Johnson, 91 N.M. 148 , 571 P.2d 415 (Ct.App. 1977). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Elledge
green
2 sentences1969State v. Elledge, 78 N.M. 157 , 429 P.2d 355 (1967); State v. Baumgardner, 79 N.M. 341 , 443 P.2d 511 (Ct.App.1968). (2)He was denied his right to a speedy-trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by § 41-11-4, N.M.S.A.1953. 1969State v. Elledge, 78 N.M. 157 , 429 P.2d 355 (1967); State v. Baumgardner, 79 N.M. 341 , 443 P.2d 511 (Ct.App.1968). (2)He was denied his right to a speedy-trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by § 41-11-4, N.M.S.A.1953. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
State v. Baumgardner
neutral
2 sentences1969State v. Elledge, 78 N.M. 157 , 429 P.2d 355 (1967); State v. Baumgardner, 79 N.M. 341 , 443 P.2d 511 (Ct.App.1968). (2)He was denied his right to a speedy-trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by § 41-11-4, N.M.S.A.1953. 1969State v. Elledge, 78 N.M. 157 , 429 P.2d 355 (1967); State v. Baumgardner, 79 N.M. 341 , 443 P.2d 511 (Ct.App.1968). (2)He was denied his right to a speedy-trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by § 41-11-4, N.M.S.A.1953. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.