Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1958–1986 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bartholf v. Bakergreen2 sentences1983"Voluntary exposure is the bedrock upon which the doctrine of assumed risk rests." Bartholf v. Baker, 71 So.2d 480, 483 (Fla. 1954). 1976In Bartholf v. Baker, Fla. 1954, 71 So.2d 480, 483 , the Supreme Court said: "Voluntary exposure is the bedrock upon which the doctrine of assumed risk rests. | 1 | 9 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kuehner v. Green
green
2 sentences1986"Voluntary exposure is the bedrock upon which the doctrine of assumed risk rests." Kuehner, 436 So.2d at 80 . 1985Kuehner v. Green, 436 So.2d 78 (Fla. 1983). | 2 | 1985–1986 |
Byers v. Gunn
green
2 sentences1976Appreciation of the danger is an essential to the defense of assumption of risk, or of contributory negligence, as is knowledge of the condition which creates the peril." In Byers v. Gunn, Fla. 1955, 81 So.2d 723, 727 , in referring to the distinction between contributory negligence and assumption of risk, the Supreme Court said: "A generally safe rule to follow is that the latter involves a choice made more or less deliberately". *164 In Henry v. Britt, Fla.App. 1969, 220 So.2d 917, 919 , the court said: "Turning next to the defense of assumption of the risk on behalf of the decedent, it must 1976Appreciation of the danger is an essential to the defense of assumption of risk, or of contributory negligence, as is knowledge of the condition which creates the peril." In Byers v. Gunn, Fla. 1955, 81 So.2d 723, 727 , in referring to the distinction between contributory negligence and assumption of risk, the Supreme Court said: "A generally safe rule to follow is that the latter involves a choice made more or less deliberately". *164 In Henry v. Britt, Fla.App. 1969, 220 So.2d 917, 919 , the court said: "Turning next to the defense of assumption of the risk on behalf of the decedent, it must | 2 | 1958–1976 |
Henry v. Britt
green
2 sentences1976Appreciation of the danger is an essential to the defense of assumption of risk, or of contributory negligence, as is knowledge of the condition which creates the peril." In Byers v. Gunn, Fla. 1955, 81 So.2d 723, 727 , in referring to the distinction between contributory negligence and assumption of risk, the Supreme Court said: "A generally safe rule to follow is that the latter involves a choice made more or less deliberately". *164 In Henry v. Britt, Fla.App. 1969, 220 So.2d 917, 919 , the court said: "Turning next to the defense of assumption of the risk on behalf of the decedent, it must 1976Appreciation of the danger is an essential to the defense of assumption of risk, or of contributory negligence, as is knowledge of the condition which creates the peril." In Byers v. Gunn, Fla. 1955, 81 So.2d 723, 727 , in referring to the distinction between contributory negligence and assumption of risk, the Supreme Court said: "A generally safe rule to follow is that the latter involves a choice made more or less deliberately". *164 In Henry v. Britt, Fla.App. 1969, 220 So.2d 917, 919 , the court said: "Turning next to the defense of assumption of the risk on behalf of the decedent, it must | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co. v. Lee
neutral
2 sentences1960Appreciation of the danger is an essential to the defense of assumption of risk, or of contributory negligence as is knowledge of the condition which creates the peril.” In affirming City of Williston v. Cribbs, Fla., 82 So.2d 150, 151 , our Supreme Court said that its conclusion was not reached solely by indication of the principle that the defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of risk should be resolved by the jury, as was held in Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co. v. Lee, 90 Fla. 632 , 106 So. 462 , and Atlantic Coast Line R. 1960Appreciation of the danger is an essential to the defense of assumption of risk, or of contributory negligence as is knowledge of the condition which creates the peril.” In affirming City of Williston v. Cribbs, Fla., 82 So.2d 150, 151 , our Supreme Court said that its conclusion was not reached solely by indication of the principle that the defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of risk should be resolved by the jury, as was held in Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co. v. Lee, 90 Fla. 632 , 106 So. 462 , and Atlantic Coast Line R. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
City of Williston v. Cribbs
green
1 sentence1960Appreciation of the danger is an essential to the defense of assumption of risk, or of contributory negligence as is knowledge of the condition which creates the peril.” In affirming City of Williston v. Cribbs, Fla., 82 So.2d 150, 151 , our Supreme Court said that its conclusion was not reached solely by indication of the principle that the defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of risk should be resolved by the jury, as was held in Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co. v. Lee, 90 Fla. 632 , 106 So. 462 , and Atlantic Coast Line R. | 1 | 1960–1960 |