11 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1934–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dobbs v. Sea Isle Hotelgreen2 sentences1991Dobbs v. Sea Isle Hotel, 56 So.2d 341, 342 (Fla. 1952) (where the legislature provides express exceptions to the precise language of a statute, "[w]e must assume that it thoroughly considered and purposely preempted the field of exceptions to ... the statute"); Williams v. American Sur. 1974See Dobbs v. Sea Isle Hotel, 56 So.2d 341 (Fla. 1952). | 2 | 2 |
Delong v. Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commissiongreen1 sentence2021Delong v. Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm’n, 145 So. 3d 123, 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (discussing the doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius). | 1 | 1 |
Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. Co.green1 sentence2006Co., 753 So.2d 80, 85 (Fla.2000) (applying doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius to list of statutory exclusions). [4] Section 170.01, Florida Statutes (2005), authorizes special assessments for, among other things, the construction or repair of streets, sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, greenbelts, swales, culverts, sewers, drainage structures, water supply systems, parks, recreational facilities and other infrastructure. | 1 | 1 |
Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Hillgreen1 sentence2001See Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Hill, 790 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 2001); Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Westongreen1 sentence1989E.g., State v. Diers, 532 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1988) (adopting State v. Weston, 510 So.2d 1001 *764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)); Thayer v. State, 335 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thayer v. State
green
2 sentences1985Cf. Thayer v. State, 335 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1976) (under doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, where statute enumerates the thing or things on which it is to operate, it is ordinarily to be construed as excluding from this operation all those things not expressly mentioned); Rebich v. Burdine's and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 417 So.2d 284 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied 424 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1982) (since physicians not specifically mentioned in two-year workers' compensation statute of limitations, their payment claims not governed by that statute). [6] The power of eminent domain i 1979The doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius , the inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of others, Thayer v. State, 335 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1976), applied to the facts of your inquiry, would appear to exclude any postponement or deferment of the initial hearing interview for inmates sentenced to serve a minimum mandatory term of 3 full years. | 3 | 1979–1989 |
St. John v. Coisman
green
1 sentence2004John v. Coisman, 799 So.2d 1110 , 1113 n. 3 & n. 5 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (under the doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, the expression of one thing is the exclusion of the other. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Parsons
neutral
1 sentence1990Parsons, 549 So.2d at 763-64 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Diers
green
1 sentence1989E.g., State v. Diers, 532 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1988) (adopting State v. Weston, 510 So.2d 1001 *764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)); Thayer v. State, 335 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Rebich v. BURDINE'S & LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO.
green
1 sentence1985Cf. Thayer v. State, 335 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1976) (under doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, where statute enumerates the thing or things on which it is to operate, it is ordinarily to be construed as excluding from this operation all those things not expressly mentioned); Rebich v. Burdine's and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 417 So.2d 284 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied 424 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1982) (since physicians not specifically mentioned in two-year workers' compensation statute of limitations, their payment claims not governed by that statute). [6] The power of eminent domain i | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. PUTNAM CTY. DEVELOP. AUTH.
green
1 sentence1974Neither the courts nor I can charge the legislature with enacting contrary provisions in the same act, for it is our duty, if possible, to read these several provisions as being consistent with one another rather than in conflict with each other [Cf., State v. Putnam County Development Authority, 249 So.2d 6 , 10 (Fla. 1971), interpreting allegedly conflicting statutory provisions], in view of the fact that the restrictions on limited disclosure of this confidential information and record are so explicit that they defy any conclusion to the contrary under the doctrine of expressio unius est ex | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Jackson v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1934The general rule that a private debtor may lawfully prefer one creditor over another, as expressed in the case of Johnson v. City Bank & Trust Co., 53 Fla. 265 , 44 South. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.