mandate rule (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

mandate rule in Florida

11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

CaseFollowedCited
Barber v. Stategreen
fla · 1974 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018P. 3.710(a); § 985.565(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2017); see, e.g., Barber v. State, 293 So. 2d 710, 711 (Fla. 1974) (“The requirement of [Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure] 3.710 does not continue or revive upon a second, future occasion of an adjudication of guilt and sentencing for violation of the probation earlier granted which had already fulfilled the mandate of the rule.”).

11
D.A.H. v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2017 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Deferrell, 199 So.3d at 1060-61 ; see also A.L.Y., 212 So.3d at 403 .

11
Hand v. Kushmergreen
fladistctapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012See Hand v. Kushmer, 695 So.2d 858 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

11
Renaud v. Stategreen
fla · 2006 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010See Renaud v. State, 926 So.2d 1241, 1242 (Fla.2006) (“When the alleged illegality of the sentence is not apparent on the face of the record, a rule 3.850 motion is the only available remedy.”).

11
STATE DEPT. OF HWY. & SAF. v. Metivergreen
fladistctapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
1 sentence

2003See id. at 205 .

11
United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Behargreen
fladistctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
1 sentence

2002Ass'n v. Behar, 752 So.2d 663, 664-65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("The trial court correctly found that USAA's offer of judgment was defective because it failed to comply with the mandate of rule 1.442(c)(3) to specify the amounts offered to each party.

11
Green v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 1981 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991
1 sentence

1991See Green v. State, 406 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), approved, 421 So.2d 508 (Fla. 1982).

11
State v. Greengreen
fla · 1982 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991
1 sentence

1991See Green v. State, 406 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), approved, 421 So.2d 508 (Fla. 1982).

11
Jordan v. Stategreen
fla · 1976 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
1 sentence

1987See Jordan v. State, 334 So.2d 589 (Fla.1976).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Thomas v. State green
fladistctapp · 2016
1 sentence

2017Deferrell, 199 So.3d at 1060-61 ; see also A.L.Y., 212 So.3d at 403 .

12017–2017
Labady v. State green
fladistctapp · 2001
1 sentence

2001Weekly D194 , ___ So.2d ___ [ 2001 WL 20790 ] (Fla. 3d DCA Jan.10, 2001), this Court held that such an admonishment does not satisfy the mandate of rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

12001–2001
Huot v. State green
fladistctapp · 1987
1 sentence

1991Furthermore, although not cited by the parties, this court in Huot v. State, 516 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), allowed the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea and held, based on the mandate in rule 3.172(c)(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that: Failure to advise a defendant of a maximum possible sentence prevents the defendant from being properly apprised of the significance of his plea and is therefore error for which the defendant must be afforded the opportunity to withdraw a plea of guilty.

11991–1991
Ace Delivery Service, Inc. v. Pickett neutral
fladistctapp · 1973
1 sentence

1981Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Southern Sanitation Service, 392 So.2d 355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Ace Delivery Service, Inc. v. Pickett, 274 So.2d 15 (Fla.2d DCA 1973).

11981–1981
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Southern Sanitation Service green
fladistctapp · 1981
1 sentence

1981Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Southern Sanitation Service, 392 So.2d 355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Ace Delivery Service, Inc. v. Pickett, 274 So.2d 15 (Fla.2d DCA 1973).

11981–1981
State v. Abreau green
fla · 1978
1 sentence

1980State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1978); Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1968).

11980–1980
Brown v. State green
fla · 1968
1 sentence

1980State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1978); Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1968).

11980–1980

Where else courts name it

UT 29 (1995–2025) ND 25 (1999–2026) KS 22 (2007–2026) CA 16 (1946–2026) CO 15 (1998–2026) VA 15 (2004–2025) AR 13 (2005–2025) FL 11 (1980–2018) WV 11 (1992–2024) NV 9 (1979–2022) PA 9 (1958–2021) OH 9 (1993–2024) AZ 8 (1977–2026) MO 7 (1912–2013) IL 7 (1985–2026) RI 6 (1994–2008) MD 6 (1988–2010) KY 6 (1969–2025) NJ 6 (1951–2025) MA 5 (1980–2018) AL 5 (1926–1960) TX 5 (1980–2021) WA 4 (1976–2024) NC 4 (2006–2022) MS 4 (2002–2009) MI 3 (1928–2012) NY 3 (1983–2003) DC 3 (1982–2023) IN 2 (1991–1993) OK 2 (1939–1939) CT 2 (2011–2016) WI 2 (1997–2020) IA 2 (1983–2026) HI 2 (1973–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check