6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1951–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
cluster 661469green1 sentence2002See Casey v. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa., 14 F. 3d 848 , 857 (3d Cir.1994) ("The mandate rule applies... only to those issues that were decided by the appellate court."). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Masongreen1 sentence1968State v. Mason, 90 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
BANNER EX REL. BANNER v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
green
1 sentence2025Plaintiffs' expert therefore presented a plausible contention that the signage failed to meet the law's mandate that a warning be "accurate, clear and unambiguous." Banner, 383 N.J. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Brotspies v. Dept. of Civil Service, NJ
green
2 sentences1997Cf. Brotspies v. Department of Civil Serv., 72 N.J.Super. 334, 342 , 178 A.2d 367 (App.Div.1962) (citing Brotspies, supra, 66 N.J.Super. at 495-96 , 169 A.2d 484 , and approving of its statement that “[s]ince the Department may desire to use many of the items ... for examinations for other positions, then once a particular set of questions and correct answers is publish ed, all of the value resulting from the empirical evidence so carefully collated by the Department is destroyed”). 1997Cf. Brotspies v. Department of Civil Serv., 72 N.J.Super. 334, 342 , 178 A.2d 367 (App.Div.1962) (citing Brotspies, supra, 66 N.J.Super. at 495-96 , 169 A.2d 484 , and approving of its statement that “[s]ince the Department may desire to use many of the items ... for examinations for other positions, then once a particular set of questions and correct answers is publish ed, all of the value resulting from the empirical evidence so carefully collated by the Department is destroyed”). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Brotspies v. Department of Civil Service
neutral
2 sentences1997Cf. Brotspies v. Department of Civil Serv., 72 N.J.Super. 334, 342 , 178 A.2d 367 (App.Div.1962) (citing Brotspies, supra, 66 N.J.Super. at 495-96 , 169 A.2d 484 , and approving of its statement that “[s]ince the Department may desire to use many of the items ... for examinations for other positions, then once a particular set of questions and correct answers is publish ed, all of the value resulting from the empirical evidence so carefully collated by the Department is destroyed”). 1997Cf. Brotspies v. Department of Civil Serv., 72 N.J.Super. 334, 342 , 178 A.2d 367 (App.Div.1962) (citing Brotspies, supra, 66 N.J.Super. at 495-96 , 169 A.2d 484 , and approving of its statement that “[s]ince the Department may desire to use many of the items ... for examinations for other positions, then once a particular set of questions and correct answers is publish ed, all of the value resulting from the empirical evidence so carefully collated by the Department is destroyed”). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Green
green
1 sentence1958App. 508 , 101 N.E. 2 d 604 ( App. Ct. 1951)) the court found a legislative mandate in a statute restricting the widow's forced share to one-third "after payment of all just claims." Similarly, the result in Thompson v. Wiseman, 233 F. 2 d 734 (10 Cir. 1956), was controlled by an Oklahoma statute directing payment of debts, etc., out of "property * * * devised or bequeathed to a residuary legatee." In the North Carolina case, Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Green, 236 N.C. 654 , 73 S.E. 2 d 879 ( Sup. Ct. 1953), the court was confronted by the testator's direction that federal estate taxes be pai | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Sayles v. Maine Central Railroad
green
1 sentence1958Finally, Weinberg v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore, 198 Md. 539 , 85 A. 2 d 50, 37 A.L.R. 2 d 188 ( Ct. App. 1951), was likewise controlled by a specific provision of the Maryland apportionment statute withholding its benefits from a dissenting spouse. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Weinberg v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1958Finally, Weinberg v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore, 198 Md. 539 , 85 A. 2 d 50, 37 A.L.R. 2 d 188 ( Ct. App. 1951), was likewise controlled by a specific provision of the Maryland apportionment statute withholding its benefits from a dissenting spouse. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc.
green
1 sentence1951Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc., 10 N.J. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.