11 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1913–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANYgreen2 sentences1994The law favors compromises, and a promise made in extinguishment of a doubtful claim is sufficient to support a valid contract. . . .’ [Cits.]” Smith v. Hauerty Furniture Co., 173 Ga. App. 447, 448 ( 326 SE2d 812 ) (1985). 1994The law favors compromises, and a promise made in extinguishment of a doubtful claim is sufficient to support a valid contract. . . .’ [Cits.]” Smith v. Hauerty Furniture Co., 173 Ga. App. 447, 448 ( 326 SE2d 812 ) (1985). | 4 | 4 |
Skinner v. Smithgreen2 sentences1984See OCGA § 9-3-25. “[A] promise made in extinguishment of a doubtful claim is sufficient to support a valid contract.” Skinner v. Smith, 120 Ga. App. 35, 36 ( 169 SE2d 365 ) (1969). 1984See OCGA § 9-3-25. “[A] promise made in extinguishment of a doubtful claim is sufficient to support a valid contract.” Skinner v. Smith, 120 Ga. App. 35, 36 ( 169 SE2d 365 ) (1969). | 3 | 3 |
Jefferson Ins. Co. of New York v. Dunngreen1 sentence1999Id. at 739 (5) (a). | 1 | 1 |
Warren v. Jenkinsgreen1 sentence1992Warren v. Jenkins, 190 Ga. App. 442, 443 (1) ( 379 SE2d 19 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
First National Bank v. Bayless
green
2 sentences1934J. 570), so that, in the case of a married woman, it has been held in this State that a mortgage " given by [her] upon her own property in settlement of a debt of her husband is not binding upon her, although she may have given the mortgage under the impression that the creditor holding this debt could for some reason subject the property in question to its payment, and intended by giving the mortgage to effect a compromise of what she regarded as a doubtful claim against her properly.” (Italics ours.) First National Bank of Cartersville v. Bayless, 96 Ga. 684 (2), 688 ( 23 S. E. 851 ). 1934J. 570), so that, in the case of a married woman, it has been held in this State that a mortgage ‘given by [her] upon her own property in settlement of a debt of her husband is not binding upon her, although she may have given the mortgage under the impression that the creditor holding this debt could for some reason subject the property in question to its payment, and intended by giving the mortgage to effect a compromise of what she regarded as a doubtful claim against her property.’ (Italics ours.) First National Bank of Cartersville v. Bayless, 96 Ga. 684 (2), 688 ( 23 S. E. 851 ).” Baxter | 3 | 1913–1934 |
Thornton v. Lemon, McMillan & Co.
neutral
1 sentence1934Counsel for defendant in error rely upon the first headnote of Thornton v. Lemon, 114 Ga. 155 (supra), as follows: “A promissory note executed and delivered by a married woman for the purpose of settling a pending action against her husband and herself, wherein the plaintiff alleged that both were liable, is binding upon her although in point of fact the debt declared upon was exclusively that of the husband. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Baxter v. Bank of Grantville
green
1 sentence1934J. 570), so that, in the case of a married woman, it has been held in this State that a mortgage ‘given by [her] upon her own property in settlement of a debt of her husband is not binding upon her, although she may have given the mortgage under the impression that the creditor holding this debt could for some reason subject the property in question to its payment, and intended by giving the mortgage to effect a compromise of what she regarded as a doubtful claim against her property.’ (Italics ours.) First National Bank of Cartersville v. Bayless, 96 Ga. 684 (2), 688 ( 23 S. E. 851 ).” Baxter | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Brown
green
1 sentence1913The case of Blackburn v. Lee, 137 Ga. 265 ( 73 S. E. 1 ), was cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Blackburn v. Lee
neutral
1 sentence1913The case of Blackburn v. Lee, 137 Ga. 265 ( 73 S. E. 1 ), was cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.