6 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1850–1995 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jemzura v. Jemzuragreen1 sentence1995It is well established that "[t]he settlement of a doubtful claim will uphold a promise to pay a stipulated sum” (White v Hoyt, 73 NY 505, 514-515 ; see also, Jemzura v Jemzura, 36 NY2d 496, 504 ; Nolfi Masonry Corp. v Lasker-Goldman Corp., 160 AD2d 186 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. . Hoyt
green
2 sentences1995It is well established that "[t]he settlement of a doubtful claim will uphold a promise to pay a stipulated sum” (White v Hoyt, 73 NY 505, 514-515 ; see also, Jemzura v Jemzura, 36 NY2d 496, 504 ; Nolfi Masonry Corp. v Lasker-Goldman Corp., 160 AD2d 186 ). 1895White v. Hoyt, 73 N. Y. 505 ; Wahl v. Barnum, 116 N. Y. 87 , 22 N. E. 280 ; Bank v. Parker, 130 N. Y. 415 , 29 N. E. 1094 . | 2 | 1895–1995 |
Nolfi Masonry Corp. v. Lasker-Goldman Corp.
green
1 sentence1995It is well established that "[t]he settlement of a doubtful claim will uphold a promise to pay a stipulated sum” (White v Hoyt, 73 NY 505, 514-515 ; see also, Jemzura v Jemzura, 36 NY2d 496, 504 ; Nolfi Masonry Corp. v Lasker-Goldman Corp., 160 AD2d 186 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Uniformed Firefighters Ass'n v. Beekman
green
1 sentence1988In short, even if we were to accept (which we do not) the doubtful claim that the police trustees had standing as trustees to review the determinations of the pension fund, an issue not litigated in Matter of De Milia v McGuire (supra), we do not agree that their authority to retain private counsel at the expense either of the city or the fund is "necessarily implied” in order to "allow” them "to properly function” as trustees. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Cahn v. Town of Huntington
green
1 sentence1988(See, Cahn v Town of Huntington, supra, 29 NY2d, at 455 .) We are confronted in this lawsuit with a section of the City Charter (§ 395) that specifically prohibits any "officer or agency” from employing any attorney or counsel, except under circumstances not presented here, and as to those circumstances stipulates that the employment of counsel shall be at the expense of the officer or agency. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Claim of Walker v. Clyde Steamship Co.
green
1 sentence1917In Matter of Walker v. Clyde Steamship Co., 215 N. Y. 529, 531 , the same judge remarked: “ The remedy provided by the Workmen’s Compensation Act is a substitute for the common-law remedy. ’ ’ He held that it operated as an exemption of all employers who complied with its requirements from suits at common law. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Fuller v. . Kemp
green
2 sentences1904In Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. Prosser, 157 N. Y. 289, 298 , the court said that the doctrine of accord and satisfaction, as set forth in Fuller v. Kemp, 138 N. Y. 231 , and Nassoiy v. Tomlinson, 148 id. 326 , “ was carried to the extreme limit, and it is not our purpose to further extend the rule,” and it was further said in the same case (p. 330), that to constitute an accord and satisfaction “ the minds of the parties must meet in making the agreement the same as in other agreements.” To create a contract by implication there must be an unequivocal and unqualified assertion of a right by one 1904In Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. Prosser, 157 N. Y. 289, 298 , the court said that the doctrine of accord and satisfaction, as set forth in Fuller v. Kemp, 138 N. Y. 231 , and Nassoiy v. Tomlinson, 148 id. 326 , “ was carried to the extreme limit, and it is not our purpose to further extend the rule,” and it was further said in the same case (p. 330), that to constitute an accord and satisfaction “ the minds of the parties must meet in making the agreement the same as in other agreements.” To create a contract by implication there must be an unequivocal and unqualified assertion of a right by one | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . Prosser
green
1 sentence1904In Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. Prosser, 157 N. Y. 289, 298 , the court said that the doctrine of accord and satisfaction, as set forth in Fuller v. Kemp, 138 N. Y. 231 , and Nassoiy v. Tomlinson, 148 id. 326 , “ was carried to the extreme limit, and it is not our purpose to further extend the rule,” and it was further said in the same case (p. 330), that to constitute an accord and satisfaction “ the minds of the parties must meet in making the agreement the same as in other agreements.” To create a contract by implication there must be an unequivocal and unqualified assertion of a right by one | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Wahl v. . Barnum
green
2 sentences1895White v. Hoyt, 73 N. Y. 505 ; Wahl v. Barnum, 116 N. Y. 87 , 22 N. E. 280 ; Bank v. Parker, 130 N. Y. 415 , 29 N. E. 1094 . 1895White v. Hoyt, 73 N. Y. 505 ; Wahl v. Barnum, 116 N. Y. 87 , 22 N. E. 280 ; Bank v. Parker, 130 N. Y. 415 , 29 N. E. 1094 . | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Traders' National Bank v. Parker
green
2 sentences1895White v. Hoyt, 73 N. Y. 505 ; Wahl v. Barnum, 116 N. Y. 87 , 22 N. E. 280 ; Bank v. Parker, 130 N. Y. 415 , 29 N. E. 1094 . 1895White v. Hoyt, 73 N. Y. 505 ; Wahl v. Barnum, 116 N. Y. 87 , 22 N. E. 280 ; Bank v. Parker, 130 N. Y. 415 , 29 N. E. 1094 . | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Stoddard v. Mix
neutral
1 sentence1850Rep. 531.) In Stewart v. Ahrenfeldt, ( 4 Denio, 189 ,) and Stoddard v. Mix, ( 14 Conn. Rep. 12 ,) the general doctrine is laid down that the compromise^ of a doubtful claim will be a good consideration. | 1 | 1850–1850 |
Stewart v. Ahrenfeldt
neutral
1 sentence1850Rep. 531.) In Stewart v. Ahrenfeldt, ( 4 Denio, 189 ,) and Stoddard v. Mix, ( 14 Conn. Rep. 12 ,) the general doctrine is laid down that the compromise^ of a doubtful claim will be a good consideration. | 1 | 1850–1850 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.