11 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bainbridgegreen2 sentences2025See Bainbridge, 108 Idaho at 276 , 698 P.2d at 338 . 2025See Bainbridge, 108 Idaho at 276 , 698 P.2d at 338 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences2019State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 497 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1340 (1983) (emphasis added). 2019State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493, 497 , 660 P.2d 1336, 1340 (1983) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Fiskgreen2 sentences1983See State v. Fisk, 92 Idaho 675 , 448 P.2d 768 (1968); Abercrombie v. State, 91 Idaho 586 , 428 P.2d 505 (1967). 1983See State v. Fisk, 92 Idaho 675 , 448 P.2d 768 (1968); Abercrombie v. State, 91 Idaho 586 , 428 P.2d 505 (1967). | 1 | 2 |
Appel v. LePagegreen2 sentences2012Perkins v. U.S. Transformer West, 132 Idaho 427, 430 , 974 P.2d 73, 76 (1999); Appel v. LePage, 135 Idaho 133, 138-39 , 15 P.3d 1141, 1146-47 (2000). 2012Perkins v. U.S. Transformer West, 132 Idaho 427, 430 , 974 P.2d 73, 76 (1999); Appel v. LePage, 135 Idaho 133, 138-39 , 15 P.3d 1141, 1146-47 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Perkins v. U.S. Transformer Westgreen2 sentences2012Perkins v. U.S. Transformer West, 132 Idaho 427, 430 , 974 P.2d 73, 76 (1999); Appel v. LePage, 135 Idaho 133, 138-39 , 15 P.3d 1141, 1146-47 (2000). 2012Perkins v. U.S. Transformer West, 132 Idaho 427, 430 , 974 P.2d 73, 76 (1999); Appel v. LePage, 135 Idaho 133, 138-39 , 15 P.3d 1141, 1146-47 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Abercrombie v. State
neutral
2 sentences1987State v. Werneth, supra. This proposition as set forth in Werneth derives from Abercrombie v. State, 91 Idaho 586 , 428 P.2d 505 (1967). 1987State v. Werneth, supra. This proposition as set forth in Werneth derives from Abercrombie v. State, 91 Idaho 586 , 428 P.2d 505 (1967). | 4 | 1968–1987 |
State v. Wright
green
1 sentence1985In Interest of Williss [Willis] [ 89 Ill.App.3d 347 , 44 Ill.Dec. 760 ], 411 N.E.2d 1126 (Ill.App.1980); State v. Doby [ 273 S.C. 704 ], 258 S.E.2d 896 (S.Carolina 1979); State v. Wright [ 274 N.C. 84 ], 161 N.[S]E.2d 581 (N.Carolina 1968). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Doby
green
2 sentences1985In Interest of Williss [Willis] [ 89 Ill.App.3d 347 , 44 Ill.Dec. 760 ], 411 N.E.2d 1126 (Ill.App.1980); State v. Doby [ 273 S.C. 704 ], 258 S.E.2d 896 (S.Carolina 1979); State v. Wright [ 274 N.C. 84 ], 161 N.[S]E.2d 581 (N.Carolina 1968). 1985In Interest of Williss [Willis] [ 89 Ill.App.3d 347 , 44 Ill.Dec. 760 ], 411 N.E.2d 1126 (Ill.App.1980); State v. Doby [ 273 S.C. 704 ], 258 S.E.2d 896 (S.Carolina 1979); State v. Wright [ 274 N.C. 84 ], 161 N.[S]E.2d 581 (N.Carolina 1968). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
People v. Willis
green
2 sentences1985In Interest of Williss [Willis] [ 89 Ill.App.3d 347 , 44 Ill.Dec. 760 ], 411 N.E.2d 1126 (Ill.App.1980); State v. Doby [ 273 S.C. 704 ], 258 S.E.2d 896 (S.Carolina 1979); State v. Wright [ 274 N.C. 84 ], 161 N.[S]E.2d 581 (N.Carolina 1968). 1985In Interest of Williss [Willis] [ 89 Ill.App.3d 347 , 44 Ill.Dec. 760 ], 411 N.E.2d 1126 (Ill.App.1980); State v. Doby [ 273 S.C. 704 ], 258 S.E.2d 896 (S.Carolina 1979); State v. Wright [ 274 N.C. 84 ], 161 N.[S]E.2d 581 (N.Carolina 1968). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Reiter v. Huffman
green
2 sentences1985State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493 , 660 P.2d 1336 (1983), cert. den. 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 . 1985State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493 , 660 P.2d 1336 (1983), cert. den. 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Harvey v. Breeding
green
2 sentences1985State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493 , 660 P.2d 1336 (1983), cert. den. 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 . 1985State v. Mitchell, 104 Idaho 493 , 660 P.2d 1336 (1983), cert. den. 461 U.S. 934 , 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Von Moltke v. Gillies
green
2 sentences1967In Bement v. State, the following portion of the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 , is quoted: "To discharge this duty ['protecting duty' of a trial judge to fully safeguard the right to counsel] properly in light of the strong presumption against waiver of the constitutional right to counsel, a judge must investigate as long and as thoroughly as the circumstances of the case before him demand. 1967In Bement v. State, the following portion of the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 , is quoted: "To discharge this duty ['protecting duty' of a trial judge to fully safeguard the right to counsel] properly in light of the strong presumption against waiver of the constitutional right to counsel, a judge must investigate as long and as thoroughly as the circumstances of the case before him demand. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Joe Shawan v. H. A. Cox, Warden
green
2 sentences1967Shawan v. Cox, 10 Cir., 350 F.2d 909 (1965). 1967Shawan v. Cox, 10 Cir., 350 F.2d 909 (1965). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Bement v. State
green
1 sentence1967So important is the right, and so strong the presumption against its waiver, that a trial judge’s clear and recorded statement of the right to an accused felon before inquiring whether the accused wishes to ‘waive’ the right, followed by the accused’s immediate affirmative ‘waiver,’ will not necessarily compel a finding of intelligent waiver, (citations).” (Emphasis added.) 422 P.2d at 62 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.