6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lane v. Penagreen2 sentences2017“A waiver of the Federal Government’s sovereign immunity must be unequivocally expressed in statutory text[.]” Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187, 192 , 116 S.Ct. 2092 , 135 L.Ed.2d 486 (1996) (citation omitted). 2017“A waiver of the Federal Government’s sovereign immunity must be unequivocally expressed in statutory text[.]” Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187, 192 , 116 S.Ct. 2092 , 135 L.Ed.2d 486 (1996) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Holmesgreen1 sentence2013See United States v. Holmes, 620 F.3d 836 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Zerbst
green
2 sentences1989For a waiver to be effective, there must be 'an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.' Hartman v. State (1973), 155 Ind.App. 199, 205 , 292 N.E.2d 293, 297 , quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 LEd. 1461 (1938)." Miller I, supra, 517 N.E.2d at 73 . 1989For a waiver to be effective, there must be 'an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.' Hartman v. State (1973), 155 Ind.App. 199, 205 , 292 N.E.2d 293, 297 , quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 LEd. 1461 (1938)." Miller I, supra, 517 N.E.2d at 73 . | 2 | 1987–1989 |
Hartman v. State
green
2 sentences1989For a waiver to be effective, there must be 'an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.' Hartman v. State (1973), 155 Ind.App. 199, 205 , 292 N.E.2d 293, 297 , quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 LEd. 1461 (1938)." Miller I, supra, 517 N.E.2d at 73 . 1989For a waiver to be effective, there must be 'an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.' Hartman v. State (1973), 155 Ind.App. 199, 205 , 292 N.E.2d 293, 297 , quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 LEd. 1461 (1938)." Miller I, supra, 517 N.E.2d at 73 . | 2 | 1987–1989 |
Robert Bowen v. State of Indiana
green
2 sentences2017The rule that statutory grants of immunity are construed narrowly, see F.D., 1 N.E.3d at 136 , does not apply here. 2017The rule that statutory grants of immunity are construed narrowly, see F.D., 1 N.E.3d at 136 , does not apply here. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Faretta v. California
green
2 sentences2002Therefore, “[w]hen a defendant asserts the right to self-representation, the court should tell the defendant of the ‘dangers and disadvantages of self representation.’ ” Id. (quoting Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975)). 2002Therefore, “[w]hen a defendant asserts the right to self-representation, the court should tell the defendant of the ‘dangers and disadvantages of self representation.’ ” Id. (quoting Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975)). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Poynter v. State
green
2 sentences2002Due to the presumption against a waiver of the fundamental right to counsel, the trial court must “come to a considered determination that the defendant is making a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver.” Poynter, 749 N.E.2d at 1126 . 2002Therefore, “[w]hen a defendant asserts the right to self-representation, the court should tell the defendant of the ‘dangers and disadvantages of self representation.’ ” Id. (quoting Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975)). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Miller v. State
green
2 sentences1989For a waiver to be effective, there must be 'an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.' Hartman v. State (1973), 155 Ind.App. 199, 205 , 292 N.E.2d 293, 297 , quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 LEd. 1461 (1938)." Miller I, supra, 517 N.E.2d at 73 . 1989For a waiver to be effective, there must be `an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.' Hartman v. State (1973), 155 Ind. App. 199, 205 , 292 N.E.2d 293, 297 , quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938)." Miller I, supra, 517 N.E.2d at 73 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Nation v. State
neutral
1 sentence1982Nation v. State, (1982) Ind.App., 426 N.E.2d 436 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.