10 Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gregory A. Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginiagreen2 sentences2026See, e.g., Richardson v. Commonwealth, 67 Va. App. 436, 441 (2017) (“On appeal, appellant contends that he never knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial. 2026See, e.g., Richardson v. Commonwealth, 67 Va. App. 436, 441 (2017) (“On appeal, appellant contends that he never knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial. | 2 | 2 |
Boykin v. Alabamagreen2 sentences2023Cf. Boykin, 395 U.S. at 243 (“We cannot presume a waiver of these three important federal rights from a silent record.”). 1986Taylor v. United States, 414 U.S. 17, 18 (1973); Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337, 344 (1970); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 246-47 (1969). | 2 | 2 |
Sisk v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1997Because of the presumption against waiver of a constitutional right, Sisk v. Commonwealth, 3 Va.App. 459, 462 , 350 S.E.2d 676, 678 (1986), a trial court must determine that a defendant’s waiver of trial by jury is voluntary, knowing and intelligent. 1997Because of the presumption against waiver of a constitutional right, Sisk v. Commonwealth, 3 Va.App. 459, 462 , 350 S.E.2d 676, 678 (1986), a trial court must determine that a defendant’s waiver of trial by jury is voluntary, knowing and intelligent. | 2 | 2 |
Taylor v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1995In Head , we noted that while there is a presumption against waiver of a defendant’s right to be present at *450 trial, “[a] defendant’s voluntary absence from trial may be properly construed under the sixth amendment as a waiver of his right of confrontation.” Id. (citing Taylor v. United States, 414 U.S. 17 , 94 S.Ct. 194 , 38 L.Ed.2d 174 (1973)). 1995In Head , we noted that while there is a presumption against waiver of a defendant’s right to be present at *450 trial, “[a] defendant’s voluntary absence from trial may be properly construed under the sixth amendment as a waiver of his right of confrontation.” Id. (citing Taylor v. United States, 414 U.S. 17 , 94 S.Ct. 194 , 38 L.Ed.2d 174 (1973)). | 1 | 2 |
Barlow v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2026See Laney, 76 Va. App. at 165; Barlow v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 421, 431 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Pittman v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1998Sisk v. Commonwealth, 3 Va.App. 459, 462 , 350 S.E.2d 676, 678 (1986); Pittman v. Commonwealth, 10 Va.App. 693, 695 , 395 S.E.2d 473, 474 (1990). 1998Sisk v. Commonwealth, 3 Va.App. 459, 462 , 350 S.E.2d 676, 678 (1986); Pittman v. Commonwealth, 10 Va.App. 693, 695 , 395 S.E.2d 473, 474 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Wright v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1997Rule 3A:13(b); Wright v. Commonwealth 4 Va.App. 303, 306, 357 S.E.2d 547, 549 (1987). 1997Rule 3A:13(b); Wright v. Commonwealth 4 Va.App. 303, 306, 357 S.E.2d 547, 549 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Peterson v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1994Peterson v. Commonwealth, 5 Va. App. 389, 396 , 363 S.E.2d 440, 444 (1987); see Bolden v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 187, 190-91 , 397 S.E.2d 534, 536 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 943 (1991). 1994Peterson v. Commonwealth, 5 Va. App. 389, 396 , 363 S.E.2d 440, 444 (1987); see Bolden v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 187, 190-91 , 397 S.E.2d 534, 536 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 943 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
Bolden v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1994Peterson v. Commonwealth, 5 Va. App. 389, 396 , 363 S.E.2d 440, 444 (1987); see Bolden v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 187, 190-91 , 397 S.E.2d 534, 536 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 943 (1991). 1994Peterson v. Commonwealth, 5 Va. App. 389, 396 , 363 S.E.2d 440, 444 (1987); see Bolden v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 187, 190-91 , 397 S.E.2d 534, 536 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 943 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. City of Los Angelesgreen1 sentence1994Peterson v. Commonwealth, 5 Va. App. 389, 396 , 363 S.E.2d 440, 444 (1987); see Bolden v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 187, 190-91 , 397 S.E.2d 534, 536 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 943 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Zerbstgreen1 sentence1986While there is a presumption against the waiver of a fundamental right, Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 (1938), under certain circumstances, anaccused may forfeit his constitutional right to be present at his trial. | 1 | 1 |
Illinois v. Allengreen1 sentence1986Taylor v. United States, 414 U.S. 17, 18 (1973); Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337, 344 (1970); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 246-47 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hunter v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2026Hunter v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 187 , 7 To the contrary, we have a presumption against the waiver of constitutional rights. 2026Hunter v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 187 , 7 To the contrary, we have a presumption against the waiver of constitutional rights. | 2 | 2026–2026 |
Head v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1996While there is a presumption against the waiver of a defendant's fundamental right to be present at trial, "[a] defendant's voluntary absence from trial may be properly construed under the [S]ixth [A]mendment as a waiver of his right of confrontation." Id. at 168, 348 S.E.2d at 426-27 . 1995In Head , we noted that while there is a presumption against waiver of a defendant’s right to be present at *450 trial, “[a] defendant’s voluntary absence from trial may be properly construed under the sixth amendment as a waiver of his right of confrontation.” Id. (citing Taylor v. United States, 414 U.S. 17 , 94 S.Ct. 194 , 38 L.Ed.2d 174 (1973)). | 2 | 1995–1996 |
Allen v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2023“Moreover, the presumption against the waiver of constitutional rights forbids the relinquishment of those rights by mere silence.” Allen, 27 Va. App. at 731 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Crosby v. United States
green
2 sentences1995In Crosby v. United States, 506 U.S. 255 , 113 S.Ct. 748 , 122 L.Ed.2d 25 (1993), the Supreme Court of the United States recognized the distinction between pretrial and midtrial flight of a criminal defendant and its impact on the state’s interest in proceeding with the prosecution of a defendant in his absence. 1995In Crosby v. United States, 506 U.S. 255 , 113 S.Ct. 748 , 122 L.Ed.2d 25 (1993), the Supreme Court of the United States recognized the distinction between pretrial and midtrial flight of a criminal defendant and its impact on the state’s interest in proceeding with the prosecution of a defendant in his absence. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.