Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1964–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Woodenbury v. Spiergreen2 sentences1967See Woodenbury v. Spier, 122 App Div 396 , 106 NYS 817 ; Harlank Realty Corp. v. Rosenstock, 154 NYS2d 95 . 1967See Woodenbury v. Spier, 122 App Div 396 , 106 NYS 817 ; Harlank Realty Corp. v. Rosenstock, 154 NYS2d 95 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ableman v. Slader
green
2 sentences1972Hayne v. Fenton, 321 Ill. 442 , 151 N.E. 877 , where a partition suit was actually pending against the land involved; Firebaugh v. Wittenberg, 309 Ill. 536 , 141 N.E. 379 , where there was outstanding an inchoate right of dower; and Ableman v. Slader, 80 Ill.App.2d 94 , 224 N.E.2d 569 , where a building code violation suit was actually pending against the property involved. 1972Hayne v. Fenton, 321 Ill. 442 , 151 N.E. 877 , where a partition suit was actually pending against the land involved; Firebaugh v. Wittenberg, 309 Ill. 536 , 141 N.E. 379 , where there was outstanding an inchoate right of dower; and Ableman v. Slader, 80 Ill.App.2d 94 , 224 N.E.2d 569 , where a building code violation suit was actually pending against the property involved. | 3 | 1970–1972 |
Carpenters' Union v. Citizens Committee to Enforce the Landis Award
green
2 sentences1969In Carpenters’ Union v. Citizens’ Committee to Enforce Landis Award, 333 Ill 225, 246, 164 NE 393 , our Supreme Court stated: “‘No persons, individually or by combination, have the right to directly or indirectly interfere with or disturb another in his lawful business or occupation or for the sake of compelling him to do some act which in his own judgment his own interest does not require. 1964In Carpenters’ Union v. Citizens’ Committee to Enforce Landis Award, 333 Ill 225, 246, 164 NE 393 , our Supreme Court stated: “No persons, individually or by combination, have the right to directly or indirectly interfere with or disturb another in his lawful business or occupation or for the sake of compelling him to do some act which in his own judgment his own interest does not require. | 2 | 1964–1969 |
City of Chicago v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
green
1 sentence2021Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Banco Popular v. Beneficial Systems, Inc.
green
1 sentence2012Banco Popular, 335 Ill. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Bickerman v. Wosik
green
2 sentences1994This court found that "[t]here was no evidence in this case to indicate that a building code violation caused the decedent's injuries." ( Bickerman, 245 Ill. 1994This court found that "[tjhere was no evidence in this case to indicate that a building code violation caused the decedent’s injuries.” (Bickerman, 245 Ill. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Underwood v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.
green
2 sentences1989The Village’s second contention is that the Commission erred in not finding that the term “encumbrance” included “to load with debt” or “to burden with financial obligations.” The Village cites to Fuller v. Dillon (1964), 220 Ga. 36 , 136 S.E.2d 733 , and Underwood v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. (1933), 205 Ind. 316 , 185 N.E. 118 , to argue that the term “encumbrance” means, among other things, to load with debt or burden with financial obligations. 1989The Village’s second contention is that the Commission erred in not finding that the term “encumbrance” included “to load with debt” or “to burden with financial obligations.” The Village cites to Fuller v. Dillon (1964), 220 Ga. 36 , 136 S.E.2d 733 , and Underwood v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. (1933), 205 Ind. 316 , 185 N.E. 118 , to argue that the term “encumbrance” means, among other things, to load with debt or burden with financial obligations. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Fuller v. Dillon
green
2 sentences1989The Village’s second contention is that the Commission erred in not finding that the term “encumbrance” included “to load with debt” or “to burden with financial obligations.” The Village cites to Fuller v. Dillon (1964), 220 Ga. 36 , 136 S.E.2d 733 , and Underwood v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. (1933), 205 Ind. 316 , 185 N.E. 118 , to argue that the term “encumbrance” means, among other things, to load with debt or burden with financial obligations. 1989The Village’s second contention is that the Commission erred in not finding that the term “encumbrance” included “to load with debt” or “to burden with financial obligations.” The Village cites to Fuller v. Dillon (1964), 220 Ga. 36 , 136 S.E.2d 733 , and Underwood v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. (1933), 205 Ind. 316 , 185 N.E. 118 , to argue that the term “encumbrance” means, among other things, to load with debt or burden with financial obligations. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Schiro v. W. E. Gould & Co.
green
2 sentences1984Gould & Co. (1960), 18 Ill. 2d 538 , 165 N.E.2d 286 . 1984Gould & Co. (1960), 18 Ill. 2d 538 , 165 N.E.2d 286 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Hayne v. Fenton
green
2 sentences1972Hayne v. Fenton, 321 Ill. 442 , 151 N.E. 877 , where a partition suit was actually pending against the land involved; Firebaugh v. Wittenberg, 309 Ill. 536 , 141 N.E. 379 , where there was outstanding an inchoate right of dower; and Ableman v. Slader, 80 Ill.App.2d 94 , 224 N.E.2d 569 , where a building code violation suit was actually pending against the property involved. 1972Hayne v. Fenton, 321 Ill. 442 , 151 N.E. 877 , where a partition suit was actually pending against the land involved; Firebaugh v. Wittenberg, 309 Ill. 536 , 141 N.E. 379 , where there was outstanding an inchoate right of dower; and Ableman v. Slader, 80 Ill.App.2d 94 , 224 N.E.2d 569 , where a building code violation suit was actually pending against the property involved. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Firebaugh v. Wittenberg
green
2 sentences1972Hayne v. Fenton, 321 Ill. 442 , 151 N.E. 877 , where a partition suit was actually pending against the land involved; Firebaugh v. Wittenberg, 309 Ill. 536 , 141 N.E. 379 , where there was outstanding an inchoate right of dower; and Ableman v. Slader, 80 Ill.App.2d 94 , 224 N.E.2d 569 , where a building code violation suit was actually pending against the property involved. 1972Hayne v. Fenton, 321 Ill. 442 , 151 N.E. 877 , where a partition suit was actually pending against the land involved; Firebaugh v. Wittenberg, 309 Ill. 536 , 141 N.E. 379 , where there was outstanding an inchoate right of dower; and Ableman v. Slader, 80 Ill.App.2d 94 , 224 N.E.2d 569 , where a building code violation suit was actually pending against the property involved. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.