Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Pomykalagreen2 sentences2015See People v. Leach, 2012 IL 111534, ¶ 141 (harmless error "certainly cannot rise to the level of plain error"); People v. Pomykala, 203 Ill. 2d 198, 210 (2003) (error in jury instructions will be considered harmless if result of trial would not have been different if jury had been - 20 - No. 1-12-0958 properly instructed). 2015See People v. Leach, 2012 IL 111534, ¶ 141 (harmless error "certainly cannot rise to the level of plain error"); People v. Pomykala, 203 Ill. 2d 198, 210 (2003) (error in jury instructions - 20 - No. 1-12-0958 will be considered harmless if result of trial would not have been different if jury had been properly instructed). | 4 | 4 |
People v. Leachgreen2 sentences2015See People v. Leach, 2012 IL 111534, ¶ 141 (harmless error "certainly cannot rise to the level of plain error"); People v. Pomykala, 203 Ill. 2d 198, 210 (2003) (error in jury instructions will be considered harmless if result of trial would not have been different if jury had been - 20 - No. 1-12-0958 properly instructed). 2015See People v. Leach, 2012 IL 111534, ¶ 141 (harmless error "certainly cannot rise to the level of plain error"); People v. Pomykala, 203 Ill. 2d 198, 210 (2003) (error in jury instructions - 20 - No. 1-12-0958 will be considered harmless if result of trial would not have been different if jury had been properly instructed). | 4 | 4 |
People v. Bakergreen1 sentence2023Id. at ___, 142 S. Ct. at 2137 . ¶ 27 The same panel as in this case (with Presiding Justice Oden Johnson writing the unanimous opinion) recently addressed a nearly identical claim in People v. Baker, 2023 IL App (1st) 220328, ¶¶ 2, 16-17 , where the defendant claimed that the UUWF was unconstitutional as applied to him. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Mitchemgreen1 sentence2020See Mitchem, 2019 IL App (1st) 162257, ¶¶ 26-27 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Czarnecki v. Uno-Ven Co.
green
2 sentences2010In addition, “plaintiffs original decision to file in Will County, his voluntary dismissal on the brink of trial, and the subsequent filing of a nearly identical claim in Cook County strongly implies that plaintiff is engaging in impermissible forum shopping.” Czarnecki, 339 Ill. 2010In addition, “plaintiff’s original decision to file in Will County, his voluntary dismissal on the brink of trial, and the subsequent filing of a nearly identical claim in Cook County strongly implies that plaintiff is engaging in impermissible forum shopping.” Czarnecki, 339 Ill. | 4 | 2010–2010 |
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen
green
2 sentences2023Id. at ___, 142 S. Ct. at 2137 . ¶ 27 The same panel as in this case (with Presiding Justice Oden Johnson writing the unanimous opinion) recently addressed a nearly identical claim in People v. Baker, 2023 IL App (1st) 220328, ¶¶ 2, 16-17 , where the defendant claimed that the UUWF was unconstitutional as applied to him. 2023Id. at ___, 142 S. Ct. at 2137 . ¶ 27 The same panel as in this case (with Presiding Justice Oden Johnson writing the unanimous opinion) recently addressed a nearly identical claim in People v. Baker, 2023 IL App (1st) 220328, ¶¶ 2, 16-17 , where the defendant claimed that the UUWF was unconstitutional as applied to him. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2015Yet, the majority concludes that defendant cannot show any serious risk that the jury misunderstood the law because the court gave a nearly identical instruction to IPI 3.06-3.07. ¶ 170 I would note additionally, that the court in People v. Johnson, 385 Ill. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Patterson
green
1 sentence2015Where there need not be "absolute symmetry" in sentencing, and where the legislature has clearly expressed that the purpose of the Act is the rehabilitation of the minor as well as 24 1-14-3316 "promot[ing] a juvenile justice system capable of dealing with the problem of juvenile delinquency, a system that will protect the community, impose accountability for violations of law and equip juvenile offenders with competencies to live responsibly and productively" (705 ILCS 405/5-101 (West 2012)); and where our supreme court has instructed that the Roper, Graham, and Miller decisions are closely l | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.