nearly identical clause (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

nearly identical clause in Ohio

7 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Carson green
ohioctapp · 2025
1 sentence

2026The Trial Court Erred by Presuming the Child Incompetent {¶ 22} Recently, in State v. Carson, 2025-Ohio-2409 , (10th Dist.) the Tenth District Court of Appeals examined a nearly identical challenge.

12026–2026
State v. Petro green
ohio · 1947
1 sentence

2017State v. Petro, 148 Ohio St. 505 (1947), syllabus; see also Tolliver at ¶ 18; In re S.S. at ¶ 11 (applying a nearly identical standard in a permanent custody case based upon a motion for new trial filed pursuant to Civ.R. 59); In re Shad at ¶ 10 (applying the standard from Petro in an appeal of the denial of a motion for new trial in a juvenile delinquency case). 9 {¶24} Here, we cannot conclude the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion.1 First, there was no evidence in the record, aside from T.M.’s counsel’s assertion, that Tom-Tom was in fact acquitted.

12017–2017
State v. Lay neutral
ohioctapp · 2012
1 sentence

2013Champaign No. 2012-CA-7, 2012-Ohio-4447 .

12013–2013
Muehrcke v. Housel, Unpublished Decision (10-13-2005) green
ohioctapp · 2005
1 sentence

2006The rationale for conducting such a hearing will be further discussed under Miller's third assignment of error. {¶ 17} Bassett also asserts that Muehrcke v. Housel, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 85643 85644, 2005-Ohio-5440 , addressed a nearly identical privilege as the case at hand.

12006–2006
State v. Thomas green
ohio · 1988
2 sentences

2006In State v. Thomas (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 213, 220 , 533 N.E.2d 286 , we upheld a nearly identical instruction, holding that the instruction at issue was not an “acquittal first” instruction.

2006In State v. Thomas (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 213, 220 , 533 N.E.2d 286 , we upheld a nearly identical instruction, holding that the instruction at issue was not an “acquittal first” instruction.

12006–2006
Patterson v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp. green
calctapp · 1993
2 sentences

2004Corp. (1993), 14 Cal.App.4th 1659 , 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 563 , which the California appellate court had also found to be unconscionable and unenforceable.

2004Corp. (1993), 14 Cal.App.4th 1659 , 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 563 , which the California appellate court had also found to be unconscionable and unenforceable.

12004–2004
Williams v. Aetna Finance Co. green
ohio · 1998
1 sentence

2004In this situation, there arises considerable doubt that any true agreement ever existed to submit disputes to arbitration.” Williams, 83 Ohio St.3d at 473 , 700 N.E.2d 859 . {¶ 43} The court analogized the arbitration clause in its case to a nearly identical clause assessed by a California court in Patterson v. ITT Consumer Fin.

12004–2004
Wedge Products, Inc. v. Hartford Equity Sales Co. green
ohio · 1987
2 sentences

1987Wedge Products, Inc. v. Hartford Equity Sales Co. (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 65 , 31 OBR 180, 509 N.E. 2d 74 , syllabus.

1987Wedge Products, Inc. v. Hartford Equity Sales Co. (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 65 , 31 OBR 180, 509 N.E. 2d 74 , syllabus.

11987–1987

Where else courts name it

CA 27 (1995–2025) PA 21 (1999–2026) IN 16 (1976–2025) IL 11 (2010–2023) WA 9 (1987–2019) MO 9 (1994–2019) CT 8 (1970–2021) FL 8 (1996–2019) MS 8 (1990–2025) OH 7 (1987–2026) NY 6 (1987–2026) IA 5 (1986–2021) OR 5 (1990–2025) TX 4 (1986–2004) AZ 4 (1970–2024) MI 3 (1974–2018) MD 3 (1985–2013) MA 3 (1995–2016) UT 3 (1997–2019) DE 3 (2015–2025) ID 3 (1994–2026) NC 2 (2001–2015) MT 2 (2002–2006) MN 2 (1991–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check