Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Florida v. JLgreen2 sentences2021With respect to the call itself, the court noted that the caller “provided no predictive information 1 Although there is no dispute that the tip at issue was made via a phone call, there is no evidence that the anonymous caller in J.L. used an emergency phone number to make the tip. -7- and therefore left the police without means to test the informant’s knowledge or credibility”; rather, “[a]ll the police had to go on in this case was the bare report of an unknown, unaccountable informant who neither explained how he knew about the gun nor supplied any basis for believing he had inside informa 2020“The anonymous call concerning J.L. provided no predictive information and therefore left the police without means to test the informant’s knowledge or credibility.” J.L., 529 U.S. at 271 . | 9 | 11 |
Alabama v. Whitegreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 331-32 (1990) (finding signifi- cant aspects of the informant's story, especially those predict- ing the defendant's future behavior, were sufficiently corrobo- rated by the police to furnish reasonable suspicion); cf. J.L., 529 U.S. at 271 ("The anonymous call *** provided no predictive - 28 - information and therefore left the police without means to test the informant's knowledge or credibility."). 2011See, e.g., Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 331-32 (1990) (finding significant aspects of the informant’s story, especially those predicting the defendant’s future behavior, were sufficiently corroborated by the police to furnish reasonable suspicion); cf. J.L., 529 U.S. at 271 (“The anonymous call *** provided no predictive information and therefore left the police without means to test the informant’s knowledge or credibility.”). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Boyeagreen1 sentence2012See J.L., 529 U.S. at 271 (“The anonymous call concerning [the defendant] provided no predictive information and therefore left the police without means to test the informant’s knowledge or credibility.”). -6- N.W.2d 516 (quoting Boyea, 765 A.2d at 867 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.