police without means test (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

police without means test in Ohio

5 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Alabama v. Whitegreen
scotus · 1990 · cited in 2 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 , 327 .

2001See Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 , 327 .

22
Florida v. JLgreen
scotus · 2000 · cited in 3 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2017–2019
2 sentences

2019We further noted, “[t]he anonymous call concerning [the defendant] provided no predictive information and, therefore, left the police without means to test the informant’s knowledge or credibility.” Id.

2017As emphasized in J.L. , "the anonymous call concerning J.L., provided no predictive information and therefore left the police without means to test the informant's knowledge or credibility." J.L. 529 U.S. at 271 , 120 S.Ct. 1375 , 146 L.Ed.2d 254 .

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

IL 10 (2000–2021) OH 5 (2001–2019) FL 4 (2000–2012) TX 4 (2002–2015) CA 3 (2000–2018) MS 3 (2013–2015) TN 2 (2012–2018) MI 2 (2009–2011) NJ 2 (2002–2012) MO 2 (2001–2025) AZ 2 (2009–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check