Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1949–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wilkey v. Illinois Racing Boardgreen2 sentences2009The finality of an order which remands an action to the agency turns on the substance of the instructions. “ ‘[I]f, upon remandment, the trial court has only to enter a judgment or decree in accordance with the directions of the reviewing court, or to conduct further proceedings on uncontroverted incidental matters, then, irrespective of the remanding clause in the judgment order, the judgment of the Appellate Court is final and reviewable.’ ” Wilkey v. Illinois Racing Board, 96 Ill. 2d 245, 249 (1983), quoting Cory Corp. v. Fitzgerald, 403 Ill. 409, 414 (1949). 2001The court stated: "'[I]f, upon remandment, the trial court has only to enter a judgment or decree in accordance with the directions of the reviewing court, or to conduct further proceedings on uncontroverted incidental matters, then, irrespective of the remanding clause in the judgment order, the judgment of the Appellate Court is final and reviewable.'" Wilkey , 96 Ill. 2d at 249 , quoting Cory Corp. v. Fitzgerald , 403 Ill. 409, 414 , 86 N.E.2d 363 (1949). | 2 | 5 |
Cory Corp. v. Fitzgeraldgreen2 sentences2009The finality of an order which remands an action to the agency turns on the substance of the instructions. “ ‘[I]f, upon remandment, the trial court has only to enter a judgment or decree in accordance with the directions of the reviewing court, or to conduct further proceedings on uncontroverted incidental matters, then, irrespective of the remanding clause in the judgment order, the judgment of the Appellate Court is final and reviewable.’ ” Wilkey v. Illinois Racing Board, 96 Ill. 2d 245, 249 (1983), quoting Cory Corp. v. Fitzgerald, 403 Ill. 409, 414 (1949). 2001The court stated: "'[I]f, upon remandment, the trial court has only to enter a judgment or decree in accordance with the directions of the reviewing court, or to conduct further proceedings on uncontroverted incidental matters, then, irrespective of the remanding clause in the judgment order, the judgment of the Appellate Court is final and reviewable.'" Wilkey , 96 Ill. 2d at 249 , quoting Cory Corp. v. Fitzgerald , 403 Ill. 409, 414 , 86 N.E.2d 363 (1949). | 2 | 5 |
Page v. City of Chicagogreen2 sentences2001The appellate court has thus stated that if "the court remands the cause [to the administrative agency] for a new hearing, the rights of the parties have not yet been fully and finally adjudicated." Lippert v. State Property Tax Appeal Board , 273 Ill. App. 3d 150, 153 , 652 N.E.2d 461, 463 (1995); accord Page v. City of Chicago , 299 Ill. App. 3d 450, 457 , 701 N.E.2d 218, 223 (1998). 2001The appellate court has thus stated that if "the court remands the cause [to the administrative agency] for a new hearing, the rights of the parties have not yet been fully and finally adjudicated." Lippert v. State Property Tax Appeal Board , 273 Ill. App. 3d 150, 153 , 652 N.E.2d 461, 463 (1995); accord Page v. City of Chicago , 299 Ill. App. 3d 450, 457 , 701 N.E.2d 218, 223 (1998). | 2 | 2 |
Lippert v. STATE PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BD.green2 sentences2001The appellate court has thus stated that if "the court remands the cause [to the administrative agency] for a new hearing, the rights of the parties have not yet been fully and finally adjudicated." Lippert v. State Property Tax Appeal Board , 273 Ill. App. 3d 150, 153 , 652 N.E.2d 461, 463 (1995); accord Page v. City of Chicago , 299 Ill. App. 3d 450, 457 , 701 N.E.2d 218, 223 (1998). 2001The appellate court has thus stated that if "the court remands the cause [to the administrative agency] for a new hearing, the rights of the parties have not yet been fully and finally adjudicated." Lippert v. State Property Tax Appeal Board , 273 Ill. App. 3d 150, 153 , 652 N.E.2d 461, 463 (1995); accord Page v. City of Chicago , 299 Ill. App. 3d 450, 457 , 701 N.E.2d 218, 223 (1998). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission
green
1 sentence2012A judgment can “dispose of all of the controversy between the parties” (Commonwealth Edison, 368 Ill. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Pekin Insurance v. Benson
green
1 sentence2000In Pekin Insurance Co. v. Benson, 306 Ill. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Relph v. Board of Education of DePue Unit School District No. 103
green
1 sentence1983Scott v. Silverstein (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 167, 171 ; Relph v. Board of Education (1981), 84 Ill. 2d 436, 441 ; Deckard v. Joiner (1970), 44 Ill. 2d 412, 416-17 , cert. denied (1970), 400 U.S. 941 , 27 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Deckard v. Joiner
green
1 sentence1983Scott v. Silverstein (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 167, 171 ; Relph v. Board of Education (1981), 84 Ill. 2d 436, 441 ; Deckard v. Joiner (1970), 44 Ill. 2d 412, 416-17 , cert. denied (1970), 400 U.S. 941 , 27 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Joiner v. Deckard
green
1 sentence1983Scott v. Silverstein (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 167, 171 ; Relph v. Board of Education (1981), 84 Ill. 2d 436, 441 ; Deckard v. Joiner (1970), 44 Ill. 2d 412, 416-17 , cert. denied (1970), 400 U.S. 941 , 27 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
People Ex Rel. Scott v. Silverstein
green
1 sentence1983Scott v. Silverstein (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 167, 171 ; Relph v. Board of Education (1981), 84 Ill. 2d 436, 441 ; Deckard v. Joiner (1970), 44 Ill. 2d 412, 416-17 , cert. denied (1970), 400 U.S. 941 , 27 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Moffat Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission
green
1 sentence1969(Moffat Coal Co. v. Industrial Com., 397 Ill. 196, 200 .) The motion to dismiss the appeal in No. 41670 is granted. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Bowman v. Illinois Central Railroad
green
2 sentences1962And since our decision in Bowman v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 11 Ill.2d 186 , there can be no question but what the Appellate Court must strike the remanding order when the statutory affidavit is filed, and there can likewise be no doubt that this court has power in aid of its appellate jurisdiction to issue the appropriate extraordinary writ to bring the record before it. 1962And since our decision in Bowman v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 11 Ill.2d 186 , there can be no question but what the Appellate Court must strike the remanding order when the statutory affidavit is filed, and there can likewise be no doubt that this court has power in aid of its appellate jurisdiction to issue the appropriate extraordinary writ to bring the record before it. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Morris v. Beatty
neutral
1 sentence1949(Morris v. Beatty, 390 Ill. 568 ; Smith v. Bunge, 358 Ill. 229 .) On the other hand, where a cause is remanded for a new trial or other further proceedings involving disputed questions of law or fact, the judgment of the Appellate Court is not of a final character. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Smith v. Bunge
neutral
1 sentence1949(Morris v. Beatty, 390 Ill. 568 ; Smith v. Bunge, 358 Ill. 229 .) On the other hand, where a cause is remanded for a new trial or other further proceedings involving disputed questions of law or fact, the judgment of the Appellate Court is not of a final character. | 1 | 1949–1949 |