Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
green
2 sentences2015He reiterated his adherence to the position that extrajudicial statements implicate the confrontation clause “only insofar as they are contained in formalized testimonial materials, such as affidavits, depositions, prior testimony, or confessions.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. at 329 (Thomas, J., concurring). ¶ 47 Next, in Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. ___ , 131 S. Ct. 2705 (2011), the Court considered whether a lab report, certifying the results of a blood-alcohol test performed on a sample taken from the defendant at the time of his arrest for driving while intoxicated, was p 2015He reiterated his adherence to the position that extrajudicial statements implicate the confrontation clause “only insofar as they are contained in formalized testimonial materials, such as affidavits, depositions, prior testimony, or confessions.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. at 329 (Thomas, J., concurring). ¶ 47 Next, in Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. ___ , 131 S. Ct. 2705 (2011), the Court considered whether a lab report, certifying the results of a blood-alcohol test performed on a sample taken from the defendant at the time of his arrest for driving while intoxicated, was p | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Schmerber v. California
green
2 sentences2008Moreover, defendant has not cited to any cases in which a court has applied Garrity or the analysis contained therein in order to suppress the results of a blood-alcohol test where, as here, consent to the test was not required and the results of that test constituted “real or physical evidence.” See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 764-65 , 16 L. 2008Moreover, defendant has not cited to any cases in which a court has applied Garrity or the analysis contained therein in order to suppress the results of a blood-alcohol test where, as here, consent to the test was not required and the results of that test constituted “real or physical evidence.” See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 764-65 , 16 L. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Kotecki
green
2 sentences2000Kotecki, 279 Ill. 2000Kotecki , 279 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Illinois v. Krull
green
2 sentences1996In so holding, the court refused to extend the decision in Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 , 94 L. 1996In so holding, the court refused to extend the decision in Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 , 94 L. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Cuellar v. Hout
green
1 sentence1993Using retrograde extrapolation, O’Donnell calculated the plaintiff’s alcohol level to be .104 at the time of the accident and opined that the plaintiff was intoxicated at the time of the accident. ( 168 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Woolley v. Hafner's Wagon Wheel, Inc.
green
2 sentences1990Woolley v. Hafner’s Wagon Wheel (1961), 22 Ill. 2d 413 , 176 N.E.2d 757 , discusses the admissibility in a civil case of the results of a blood-alcohol test to establish intoxication. 1990Woolley v. Hafner’s Wagon Wheel (1961), 22 Ill. 2d 413 , 176 N.E.2d 757 , discusses the admissibility in a civil case of the results of a blood-alcohol test to establish intoxication. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Anderson
green
2 sentences1990As was noted earlier, in People v. Anderson (1986), 113 Ill. 2d 1 , 495 N.E.2d 485 , the supreme court held that a psychiatric expert should be allowed to relate to the jury other psychiatric reports which he relied upon. 1990As was noted earlier, in People v. Anderson (1986), 113 Ill. 2d 1 , 495 N.E.2d 485 , the supreme court held that a psychiatric expert should be allowed to relate to the jury other psychiatric reports which he relied upon. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Thomas v. Brandt
green
2 sentences1990App.3d 95 , 493 N.E.2d 1142 , was a personal injury action arising from a motor vehicle accident in which an orthopedic surgeon was allowed to rely upon and relate to the jury the results of a blood-alcohol test on the plaintiff even though the hospital technician didn't recall who took the test, the work sheets on the method and procedure had been lost, and there was some question of whether it was the plaintiff's blood which was tested. 1990App. 3d 95 , 493 N.E.2d 1142 , was a personal injury action arising from a motor vehicle accident in which an orthopedic surgeon was allowed to rely upon and relate to the jury the results of a blood-alcohol test on the plaintiff even though the hospital technician didn’t recall who took the test, the work sheets on the method and procedure had been lost, and there was some question of whether it was the plaintiff’s blood which was tested. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Durbin
neutral
1 sentence1989(People v. Murphy (1985), 108 Ill. 2d 228, 234 ; People v. Durbin (1985), 138 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Murphy
green
1 sentence1989(People v. Murphy (1985), 108 Ill. 2d 228, 234 ; People v. Durbin (1985), 138 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.