Rivera standard in Illinois

2020Rivera, 2020 IL App (1st) 171430, ¶ 23 .

2020Rivera, 2020 IL App (1st) 171430, ¶ 23 .

2009Rivera, 227 Ill. 2d at 11 .

2009Rivera, 227 Ill. 2d at 11 .

2007This case is more similar to People v. Rice, 321 Ill.

2007This case is more similar to People v. Rice, 321 Ill.

2003Rivera, 198 Ill. 2d at 374 .

2003Rivera, 198 Ill. 2d at 374 .

2001We reject ISMIE’s argument that, if CHRPP had no duty to defend, it does not insure the same interests and risks for purposes of contribution. “ ‘It is not necessary that the policies provide identical coverage in all respects in order for the two policies to be considered concurrent,’ ” and “ ‘as long as the particular risk actually involved in the case is covered by both policies, the coverage is duplicate, and contribution will be allowed.’ ” Schal Bovis, Inc., 315 Ill.

2001We reject ISMIE’s argument that, if CHRPP had no duty to defend, it does not insure the same interests and risks for purposes of contribution. “ ‘It is not necessary that the policies provide identical coverage in all respects in order for the two policies to be considered concurrent,’ ” and “ ‘as long as the particular risk actually involved in the case is covered by both policies, the coverage is duplicate, and contribution will be allowed.’ ” Schal Bovis, Inc., 315 Ill.

2025CONCLUSION ¶ 85 In summary, we reject the alternative grounds offered by defendants for affirmance; because defendants’ motion for summary judgment failed to satisfy their initial burden of production, the burden to present a factual basis for their Complaint never shifted to plaintiffs. - 37 - 2025 IL App (2d) 240153 Regarding Sciarrone’s retaliatory discharge claim, the Village enjoys immunity from suit as stated in section 2-103 of the Immunity Act, and so the grant of summary judgment in its favor against Sciarrone on count II was not error.