Lawrence rule (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

Lawrence rule in Indiana

11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (10)

CaseFollowedCited
PALILONIS v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Hoglund eliminated this "vouching testimony exception in the context of child-molesting cases." Palilonis v. State, 970 N.E.2d 713, 729 (Ind.Ct.App.2012), trans. denied. 4 .

2013Hoglund eliminated this "vouching testimony exception in the context of child-molesting cases." Palilonis v. State, 970 N.E.2d 713, 729 (Ind.Ct.App.2012), trans. denied. 4 .

11
Stewart v. Stategreen
ind · 1990 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

11
Barger v. Stategreen
ind · 1992 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011NOTES [1] Ind.Code § 35-42-4-3(a)(1) (2001-2004). [2] The State conceded at sentencing that Hoglund could not be sentenced on both counts due to double jeopardy concerns, even though the trial evidence indicated that Hoglund caused A.H. to fellate him two to three times a week during the period charged. [3] It appears that the last time the Indiana Supreme Court addressed a Lawrence claim was in Barger v. State, 587 N.E.2d 1304, 1308 (Ind.1992). [4] In a citation of additional authority, Hoglund draws our attention to several foreign cases in which the courts have ruled similar evidence to be

2011NOTES [1] Ind.Code § 35-42-4-3(a)(1) (2001-2004). [2] The State conceded at sentencing that Hoglund could not be sentenced on both counts due to double jeopardy concerns, even though the trial evidence indicated that Hoglund caused A.H. to fellate him two to three times a week during the period charged. [3] It appears that the last time the Indiana Supreme Court addressed a Lawrence claim was in Barger v. State, 587 N.E.2d 1304, 1308 (Ind.1992). [4] In a citation of additional authority, Hoglund draws our attention to several foreign cases in which the courts have ruled similar evidence to be

11
United States v. Cacygreen
armfor · 1995 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

11
State v. Brothertongreen
iowa · 1986 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

11
State v. Kellergreen
or · 1993 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

11
State v. Bostongreen
ohio · 1989 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

11
Schutz v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

2011See, e.g., Schutz v. State, 957 S.W.2d 52, 59-73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (testimony that child was not prone to fantasize), State v. Boston, 46 Ohio St.3d 108 , 545 N.E.2d 1220, 1240 (1989) (testimony opining that child had not fantasized her abuse), State v. Keller, 315 Or. 273 , 844 P.2d 195, 201-02 (1993) (testimony that there no evidence of leading or coaching of the witness or fantasizing), State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375, 378-80 (Iowa 1986) (testimony by social worker that four-year-old child would not be able to fantasize sexual abuse), but see U.S. v. Cacy, 43 M.J. 214, 218 (CAAF 1995

11
Easley v. Stategreen
ind · 1981 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
2 sentences

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

11
Noel v. Stategreen
indctapp · 1973 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
2 sentences

1979See Noel v. State (1973), 157 Ind. App. 338 , 300 N.E.2d 132 .

1979See Noel v. State (1973), 157 Ind. App. 338 , 300 N.E.2d 132 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (21)

CaseCitedYears
Hook v. State green
indctapp · 1999
2 sentences

2013Applying the Lawrence rule, however, was not simple, as " 'the line between the impermissible vouching for the victim's credibility on the one hand and rendering permissible opinions with regard to a proclivity to not exaggerate or fantasize, on the other hand, is an extremely fine one.'" Hoglund, 962 N.E.2d at 1233 (quoting Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 , 223 n. 4 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. denied ).

2013Applying the Lawrence rule, however, was not simple, as " 'the line between the impermissible vouching for the victim's credibility on the one hand and rendering permissible opinions with regard to a proclivity to not exaggerate or fantasize, on the other hand, is an extremely fine one.'" Hoglund, 962 N.E.2d at 1233 (quoting Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 , 223 n. 4 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. denied ).

32011–2013
Hoglund v. State green
ind · 2012
2 sentences

2013Applying the Lawrence rule, however, was not simple, as " 'the line between the impermissible vouching for the victim's credibility on the one hand and rendering permissible opinions with regard to a proclivity to not exaggerate or fantasize, on the other hand, is an extremely fine one.'" Hoglund, 962 N.E.2d at 1233 (quoting Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 , 223 n. 4 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. denied ).

2013Applying the Lawrence rule, however, was not simple, as " 'the line between the impermissible vouching for the victim's credibility on the one hand and rendering permissible opinions with regard to a proclivity to not exaggerate or fantasize, on the other hand, is an extremely fine one.'" Hoglund, 962 N.E.2d at 1233 (quoting Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 , 223 n. 4 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. denied ).

22012–2013
Harris v. State green
ind · 1977
2 sentences

1981Harris v. State (1977), Ind., 366 N.E.2d 186, 188 .

1981Harris v. State (1977), Ind., 366 N.E.2d 186, 188 .

21979–1981
Joyner v. State green
ind · 1997
2 sentences

2012Although some decisions of this court had viewed the Lawrence rule to be an exception or relaxation of Evidence Rule 704, the Hoglund court noted that “‘long-standing rules of evidence have been subsumed or eliminated by the adoption of our new rules of evidence.’” Id. (quoting Joyner v. State, 678 N.E.2d 386 , 389 n.2 (Ind. 1997)).

2012Although some decisions of this court had viewed the Lawrence rule to be an exception or relaxation of Evidence Rule 704, the Hoglund court noted that “‘long-standing rules of evidence have been subsumed or eliminated by the adoption of our new rules of evidence.’” Id. (quoting Joyner v. State, 678 N.E.2d 386 , 389 n.2 (Ind. 1997)).

12012–2012
Stout v. State green
ind · 1988
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

12011–2011
Krumm v. State green
indctapp · 2003
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

12011–2011
Head v. State green
ind · 1988
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

12011–2011
Douglas v. State green
indctapp · 1985
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.App.1990) (psychiatrist); Douglas v. State, 484 N.E.2d 610 (Ind.Ct.App.1985) (psychiatric social worker).

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.App.1990) (psychiatrist); Douglas v. State, 484 N.E.2d 610 (Ind.Ct.App.1985) (psychiatric social worker).

12011–2011
Ulrich v. State green
indctapp · 1990
2 sentences

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

2011See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 555 N.E.2d 121 (Ind.1990) (psychologist); Stout v. State, 528 N.E.2d 476 (Ind.1988) (psychiatric social worker); Head v. State, 519 N.E.2d 151 (Ind.1988) (counseling psychologist); Krumm v. State, 793 N.E.2d 1170 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (psychologist and forensic interviewer); Hook v. State, 705 N.E.2d 219 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (detective); Ulrich v. State, 550 N.E.2d 114 (Ind.Ct.

12011–2011
Sweet v. State green
ind · 1982
1 sentence

1998Sweet, 439 N.E.2d at 1146-47 .

11998–1998
Lawrence v. State green
indctapp · 1996
1 sentence

1996Pursuant to these cireumstances, we found that Lawrence's intent was not the critical issue at trial Id.

11996–1996
Brooks v. State green
ind · 1986
2 sentences

1988Under the Lawrence test, an offense may be included if all the statutory elements of the lesser offense are part of the statutory definition of the greater offense, see e.g., Brooks v. State (1986), Ind., 497 N.E.2d 210 ; or, an offense may be included if the charging instrument reveals the manner and means used to commit the essential elements of the charged erime and includes all the elements of the lesser crime.

1988Under the Lawrence test, an offense may be included if all the statutory elements of the lesser offense are part of the statutory definition of the greater offense, see e.g., Brooks v. State (1986), Ind., 497 N.E.2d 210 ; or, an offense may be included if the charging instrument reveals the manner and means used to commit the essential elements of the charged erime and includes all the elements of the lesser crime.

11988–1988
Jones v. State green
ind · 1988
2 sentences

1988Jones v. State (1988), 519 N.E.2d 1233, 1234 .

1988Jones v. State (1988), 519 N.E.2d 1233, 1234 .

11988–1988
Hester v. State green
ind · 1974
2 sentences

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

11982–1982
Hash v. State green
ind · 1972
2 sentences

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

11982–1982
Estep v. State green
ind · 1979
2 sentences

1982Likewise, I join the majority’s conclusion that Estep v. State, (1979) Ind., 394 N.E.2d 111 , must be overruled insofar as it incorrectly states the law with respect to step one of the Lawrence inquiry.

1982Likewise, I join the majority’s conclusion that Estep v. State, (1979) Ind., 394 N.E.2d 111 , must be overruled insofar as it incorrectly states the law with respect to step one of the Lawrence inquiry.

11982–1982
Roddy v. State green
indctapp · 1979
2 sentences

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

11982–1982
Cole v. State green
ind · 1922
2 sentences

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

11982–1982
Murphy v. State green
indctapp · 1980
2 sentences

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

1982See also, Easley v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 435 ; Hester v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 284 , 315 N.E.2d 351 ; Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; Cole v. State, (1922) 192 Ind. 29 , 134 N.E. 867 ; Murphy v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 322 ; Roddy v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 394 N.E.2d 1098 .

11982–1982
Blackburn v. State green
ind · 1973
2 sentences

1979Blackburn v. State (1973), 260 Ind. 5, 11 , 291 N.E.2d 686, 690 .

1979Blackburn v. State (1973), 260 Ind. 5, 11 , 291 N.E.2d 686, 690 .

11979–1979
Enlow v. State green
ind · 1973
11974–1974

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 35-41-1-2 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IN 11 (1974–2013) NY 8 (1969–2024) TX 8 (2003–2024) CA 6 (1988–2023) OH 5 (2007–2019) IL 4 (1986–2026) PA 4 (2015–2024) FL 4 (1981–2018) TN 3 (2003–2008) MO 3 (1972–2015) NC 3 (2006–2019) AZ 2 (2023–2026) MI 2 (1969–1994) KY 2 (2019–2023) IA 2 (1995–2013) ND 2 (1985–1994) NJ 2 (1982–2019) VA 2 (1993–2015) VT 2 (1987–2004) AL 2 (1975–2004) CT 2 (2008–2017) MT 2 (2001–2016) LA 2 (2010–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check