Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Paramo v. Edwardsgreen2 sentences2018“A complaining party has a duty to direct the trial court’s attention to a defective affidavit, and failure to raise an objection constitutes waiver.” Paramo v. Edwards, 563 N.E.2d 595, 600 (Ind. 1990). 2018Paramo v. Edwards, 563 N.E.2d 595, 600 (Ind. 1990) (noting a complaining party has a duty to direct the trial court’s attention to a defective affidavit, and failure to raise an objection constitutes waiver). | 5 | 6 |
Jordan v. Deerygreen1 sentence2017Dillow referred to them only to say she had reviewed them, as required of medical expert affiants in this context, Jordan v. Deery, 609 N.E.2d 1104, 1110 (Ind. 1993), and Ford apparently designated them only in an attempt to comply with T.R. 56(E), requiring “[s]worn or certified copies . . . of all papers . . . referred to in an affidavit . . . .” In other words, the records were and are not part of Ford’s substantive argument on Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A04-1606-CT-1334 | April 5, 2017 Page 8 of 19 N.E.2d 595 , 600 (Ind. 1990) (“A complaining party has a duty to di | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. State
green
2 sentences2000Id. 2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Enderle v. Sharman
green
1 sentence1990Enderle v. Sharman (1981), Ind.App., 422 N.E.2d 686 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Remsen v. State
green
1 sentence1989Id. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Ahnert v. Wildman
green
1 sentence1981Ahnert v. Wildman, (1978) Ind.App., 376 N.E.2d 1182 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.