11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fisher v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Indeed, we have recognized that “ ‘[t]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming the error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that the error occurred.’ ” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d at 461 (quoting Fisher v. State, 128 Md.App. 79, 104 , 736 A.2d 1125, 1138-39 (1999)). 2013Indeed, we have recognized that “ ‘[t]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming the error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that the error occurred.’ ” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d at 461 (quoting Fisher v. State, 128 Md.App. 79, 104 , 736 A.2d 1125, 1138-39 (1999)). | 3 | 4 |
State v. Chaneygreen2 sentences2013Indeed, we have recognized that “ ‘[t]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming the error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that the error occurred.’ ” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d at 461 (quoting Fisher v. State, 128 Md.App. 79, 104 , 736 A.2d 1125, 1138-39 (1999)). 2013Indeed, we have recognized that “ ‘[t]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming the error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that the error occurred.’ ” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d at 461 (quoting Fisher v. State, 128 Md.App. 79, 104 , 736 A.2d 1125, 1138-39 (1999)). | 2 | 6 |
Rowan County v. Sloasgreen1 sentence2026And the Supreme Court of Kentucky has found that immunity entitles the State to be free “from the burdens of defending the action, not merely . . . from liability,” Rowan County v. Sloas, 201 S.W.3d 469, 474 (Ky. 2006), so “[o]bviously such an entitlement [to sovereign immunity] cannot be vindicated following a final judgment for by then the party claiming immunity has already borne the costs and burdens of defending the action[,]” Breathitt County Bd. of Educ. v. Prater, 292 S.W.3d 883, 886-87 (Ky. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Breathitt County Board of Education v. Pratergreen1 sentence2026And the Supreme Court of Kentucky has found that immunity entitles the State to be free “from the burdens of defending the action, not merely . . . from liability,” Rowan County v. Sloas, 201 S.W.3d 469, 474 (Ky. 2006), so “[o]bviously such an entitlement [to sovereign immunity] cannot be vindicated following a final judgment for by then the party claiming immunity has already borne the costs and burdens of defending the action[,]” Breathitt County Bd. of Educ. v. Prater, 292 S.W.3d 883, 886-87 (Ky. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Handmaker v. Henneygreen1 sentence2026The Supreme Court of New Mexico has stated that sovereign immunity “protects the important governmental interest of avoiding the burdens of a trial on the merits and that this interest will otherwise evade meaningful appellate review absent application of the collateral order doctrine.” Handmaker v. Henney, 992 P.2d 879, 884 (N.M. 1999); see also Washington Metro. | 1 | 1 |
White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'ngreen1 sentence2023Selective Way insists that the defendants owe contribution with respect to “these joint undertakings,” which, according to Selective Way, resulted in “common costs and obligations.” On this issue, Selective Way’s entire argument amounts to little more than an expression of disagreement. “‘The most fundamental principle of appellate review [] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that that error occurred.’” White v. Pines Cmty. Improvement | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kelch v. Mass Transit Administration
green
2 sentences2015In E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Formar-Pack, Inc., the Court of Appeals recognized that, like the attorney-client privilege, “the party claiming the privilege bears the burden ‘to substantiate its non-discovery assertion by a preponderance of the evidence[.]’ ” 351 Md. at 409 , 718 A.2d 1129 (quoting Kelch v. Mass Transit Admin., 287 Md. 223, 229 , 411 A.2d 449 (1980)). 2015In E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Formar-Pack, Inc., the Court of Appeals recognized that, like the attorney-client privilege, “the party claiming the privilege bears the burden ‘to substantiate its non-discovery assertion by a preponderance of the evidence[.]’ ” 351 Md. at 409 , 718 A.2d 1129 (quoting Kelch v. Mass Transit Admin., 287 Md. 223, 229 , 411 A.2d 449 (1980)). | 2 | 1998–2015 |
White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'n
green
1 sentence2023App. 13, 50 (2007) (quoting State v. Chaney, 375 Md. 168, 183-84 (2003)), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 403 Md. 13 (2008). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Forma-Pack, Inc.
green
2 sentences2015In E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Formar-Pack, Inc., the Court of Appeals recognized that, like the attorney-client privilege, “the party claiming the privilege bears the burden ‘to substantiate its non-discovery assertion by a preponderance of the evidence[.]’ ” 351 Md. at 409 , 718 A.2d 1129 (quoting Kelch v. Mass Transit Admin., 287 Md. 223, 229 , 411 A.2d 449 (1980)). 2015In E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Formar-Pack, Inc., the Court of Appeals recognized that, like the attorney-client privilege, “the party claiming the privilege bears the burden ‘to substantiate its non-discovery assertion by a preponderance of the evidence[.]’ ” 351 Md. at 409 , 718 A.2d 1129 (quoting Kelch v. Mass Transit Admin., 287 Md. 223, 229 , 411 A.2d 449 (1980)). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Beales v. State
green
2 sentences2007“We also recognize that trial judges are not obliged to spell out in words every thought and step of logic.... ” Beales v. State, 329 Md. 263, 273 , 619 A.2d 105 (1993). “[T]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that that error occurred.” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d 452 (quotations omitted). 2007“We also recognize that trial judges are not obliged to spell out in words every thought and step of logic.... ” Beales v. State, 329 Md. 263, 273 , 619 A.2d 105 (1993). “[T]he most fundamental principle of appellate review [ ] is that the action of a trial court is presumed to have been correct and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party claiming error first to allege some error and then to persuade us that that error occurred.” Chaney, 375 Md. at 183-84 , 825 A.2d 452 (quotations omitted). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
United States v. Eloy Joseph Romero and Ralph John Visconti
green
2 sentences1964The same was true in Romero v. United States, 249 F.2d 371 (C.A., 2d), which was cited with approval in Reina, along with 8 Wigmore, Evidence (3rd ed. 1940), § 2279. 1964The same was true in Romero v. United States, 249 F. 2d 371 (C. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.