party claiming error in Connecticut

60 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1979–2025 7 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (19)

Case	Followed	Cited
City of Milford v. Local 1566green conn · 1986 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1999 2 sentences 1999See, e.g., Bergeron v. Mackler, supra, 225 Conn. 391 -92 n.1 (“[b]ecause they were not parties to the marital dissolution proceedings, [the plaintiffs in error] could not have had the claim reviewed by way of an appeal”); Milford v. Local 1566, 200 Conn. 91, 96 , 510 A.2d 17 (1986) (“requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error be ‘aggrieved’ by the decision of the trial court”); State v. Curcio, supra, 191 Conn. 30 (“threshold question [is] whether the appeal is taken from a final judgment”). 15 A bright-line test will aid litigants, who wish to challenge trial court or 1996Partnership v. Williams Associates IV, supra, 230 Conn. 148 , the trial court should have made its own factual determinations as to the CUTPA claim. “ ‘In all civil actions a requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error be aggrieved by the decision of the trial court.’ ” Windham Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Selectmen, 234 Conn. 513, 522 , 662 A.2d 1281 (1995), quoting Milford v. Local 1566, Council 4, AFSCME, 200 Conn. 91, 95-96 , 510 A.2d 177 (1986); see Practice Book § 4000.	1	4
Cleary v. Zoning Boardgreen conn · 1966 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1993–1997 2 sentences 1994Krupa v. Farmington River power Co. , supra, 147 Conn. 153 , 156 . "[T]he inference of intent to waive must be based upon reasonably clear evidence." Advest Credit Corp. v. Pellicci's, Inc. , Superior Court, judicial district of Stamford/Norwalk at Stamford, Docket No. 09 39 00 (April 4, 1991, Mottolese, J.). "`The party claiming waiver has the burden of proving the claim.'" Connecticut National Bank v. Swanney Toyota , 8 CSCR 692 (June 9, 1993, Sullivan, J.), quoting Cleary v. Zoning Board , 153 Conn. 513 , 518 , 218 A.2d 523 (1966). 1994Krupa v. Farmington River power Co. , supra, 147 Conn. 153 , 156 . "[T]he inference of intent to waive must be based upon reasonably clear evidence." Advest Credit Corp. v. Pellicci's, Inc. , Superior Court, judicial district of Stamford/Norwalk at Stamford, Docket No. 09 39 00 (April 4, 1991, Mottolese, J.). "`The party claiming waiver has the burden of proving the claim.'" Connecticut National Bank v. Swanney Toyota , 8 CSCR 692 (June 9, 1993, Sullivan, J.), quoting Cleary v. Zoning Board , 153 Conn. 513 , 518 , 218 A.2d 523 (1966).	1	4
In Re Allison G.green conn · 2005 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2006–2022 2 sentences 2022In an administrative appeal, ‘‘[a]n aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the Superior Court . . . .’’ General Stat- utes § 4-184; see also In re Allison G., 276 Conn. 146, 157 , 883 A.2d 1226 (2005) (‘‘a requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error be aggrieved by the decision of the trial court’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)). ‘‘Aggrievement, in essence, is appellate standing. . . . 2022In an administrative appeal, ‘‘[a]n aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the Superior Court . . . .’’ General Stat- utes § 4-184; see also In re Allison G., 276 Conn. 146, 157 , 883 A.2d 1226 (2005) (‘‘a requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error be aggrieved by the decision of the trial court’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)). ‘‘Aggrievement, in essence, is appellate standing. . . .	1	3
City of Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commissiongreen conn · 1986 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1996–2000 2 sentences 2000See Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commission , 201 Conn. 421 , 431 (1986); Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission , 192 Conn. 310 , 315 (1984); Board of Police Commissioners v. Freedom of Information Commission , 192 Conn. 183 , 188 (1984); Wilson v. Freedom of Information Commission , 181 Conn. 324 , 329 (1980); see also State v. Januszewski , 182 Conn. 142 , 170-71 (1980), cert denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1981). 1996Rose v. Freedom of Information Commission, 221 Conn. 217 , 232 (1992); Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commission, 201 Conn. 421 , 431 (1986); Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission, 192 Conn. 310 , 315 (1984). 1.	1	3
Kulmacz v. Kulmaczgreen conn · 1979 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1986–2019 2 sentences 2019See Kulmacz v. Kulmacz, 177 Conn. 410 , 412–13, 418 A.2d 76 (1979) (‘‘A requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error in the decision of the trial court be aggrieved . . . for if a party attempting to appeal can by no possibility suffer injury by the judgment, he should not be permitted to appeal. . . . 2019See Kulmacz v. Kulmacz, 177 Conn. 410 , 412–13, 418 A.2d 76 (1979) (‘‘A requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error in the decision of the trial court be aggrieved . . . for if a party attempting to appeal can by no possibility suffer injury by the judgment, he should not be permitted to appeal. . . .	1	2
Hadji v. Snowgreen connappct · 2025 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 1 sentence 2025See Hadji v. Snow, 232 Conn. App. 829, 858 , A.3d (2025), petition for cert. filed (Conn. June 23, 2025) (No. 240412).	1	1
Burritt Mutual Savings Bank of New Britain v. Tuckergreen conn · 1981 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012The court reduced the amount of the mortgage debt by the exact amount challenged by the defendant in his motion to reopen. 7 See Burritt Mutual Savings Bank of New Britain v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 369 , 382 n.5, 439 A.2d 396 (1981) (“[t]here would be no need for a proceeding to ascertain the amount of the debt if the plaintiff were to accept the amount admitted by the defendant”). 2012The court reduced the amount of the mortgage debt by the exact amount challenged by the defendant in his motion to reopen. 7 See Burritt Mutual Savings Bank of New Britain v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 369 , 382 n.5, 439 A.2d 396 (1981) (“[t]here would be no need for a proceeding to ascertain the amount of the debt if the plaintiff were to accept the amount admitted by the defendant”).	1	1
State v. Januszewskigreen conn · 1980 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000	1	1
In re John C.green scotus · 1981 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000	1	1
Cose v. Cosegreen scotus · 1981 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000	1	1
Bergeron v. Macklergreen conn · 1993 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999	1	1
Ballard v. Herzkegreen tenn · 1996 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999	1	1
In Re Methodist Hospitalgreen texapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999	1	1
Wedig v. Brinstergreen conn · 1984 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991	1	1
City of Middletown v. Local Union No. 1073 of the International Ass'n of Firefightersgreen conn · 1984 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991	1	1
Wedig v. Brinstergreen connappct · 1983 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991	1	1
Belden v. Allengreen conn · 1891 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982	1	1
State v. Gaskingreen conn · 1978 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982	1	1
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Greengreen scotus · 1973 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (51)

Case	Cited	Years
Windham Taxpayers Ass'n v. Board of Selectmen green conn · 1995 2 sentences 2008In all civil actions a requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error be aggrieved by the decision of the [Appellate] [C]ourt.” (Citations.omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Windham Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Selectmen, 234 Conn. 513, 522 , 662 A.2d 1281 (1995). 2008In all civil actions a requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error be aggrieved by the decision of the [Appellate] [C]ourt.” (Citations.omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Windham Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Selectmen, 234 Conn. 513, 522 , 662 A.2d 1281 (1995).	4	1996–2008
Wilson v. Freedom of Information Commission green conn · 1980 2 sentences 2000See Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commission , 201 Conn. 421 , 431 (1986); Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission , 192 Conn. 310 , 315 (1984); Board of Police Commissioners v. Freedom of Information Commission , 192 Conn. 183 , 188 (1984); Wilson v. Freedom of Information Commission , 181 Conn. 324 , 329 (1980); see also State v. Januszewski , 182 Conn. 142 , 170-71 (1980), cert denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1981). 1998Wilson v. Freedom of Information, 181 Conn. 324 , 239 (1980).	4	1996–2000
Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. Schmitz green connappct · 1991 2 sentences 2012A requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error in the decision of the trial court be aggrieved . . . .” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. Schmitz, 24 Conn. App. 230, 232 , 587 A.2d 164 (1991). 2012A requisite element of appealability is that the party claiming error in the decision of the trial court be aggrieved . . . .” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. Schmitz, 24 Conn. App. 230, 232 , 587 A.2d 164 (1991).	3	1994–2012
Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Tarro green connappct · 1995 2 sentences 2010Moreover, a party claiming waiver has the burden of proving it.” (Citations omitted; emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Tarro, 37 Conn. App. 56, 60 , 654 A.2d 1238 (1995). 2010Moreover, a party claiming waiver has the burden of proving it.” (Citations omitted; emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Tarro, 37 Conn. App. 56, 60 , 654 A.2d 1238 (1995).	3	1996–2010
Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission green conn · 1984 2 sentences 2000See Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commission , 201 Conn. 421 , 431 (1986); Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission , 192 Conn. 310 , 315 (1984); Board of Police Commissioners v. Freedom of Information Commission , 192 Conn. 183 , 188 (1984); Wilson v. Freedom of Information Commission , 181 Conn. 324 , 329 (1980); see also State v. Januszewski , 182 Conn. 142 , 170-71 (1980), cert denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1005 (1981). 1996Rose v. Freedom of Information Commission, 221 Conn. 217 , 232 (1992); Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commission, 201 Conn. 421 , 431 (1986); Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission, 192 Conn. 310 , 315 (1984). 1.	3	1996–2000
St. Joseph's Living Center, Inc. v. Town of Windham green conn · 2009 2 sentences 2024Joseph’s Living Center, Inc. v. Windham, 290 Conn. 695, 707 , 966 A.2d 188 (2009). 2024Joseph’s Living Center, Inc. v. Windham, 290 Conn. 695, 707 , 966 A.2d 188 (2009).	2	2024–2024
State v. Lisella green conn · 1982 2 sentences 2021In determining whether the trial court has abused its discretion, we must make every reason- able presumption in favor of the correctness of its action.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cafro v. Brophy, 62 Conn. App. 113 , 118–19, 774 A.2d 206 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 933 , 776 A.2d 1149 (2001). ‘‘This court will affirm a trial court’s admission of rebuttal evidence which would have been normally presented as part of the case-in-chief unless the party claiming error sustains his burden of establishing harm- ful error.’’ State v. Lisella, 187 Conn. 335 , 337–38, 445 A.2d 2021In determining whether the trial court has abused its discretion, we must make every reason- able presumption in favor of the correctness of its action.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cafro v. Brophy, 62 Conn. App. 113 , 118–19, 774 A.2d 206 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 933 , 776 A.2d 1149 (2001). ‘‘This court will affirm a trial court’s admission of rebuttal evidence which would have been normally presented as part of the case-in-chief unless the party claiming error sustains his burden of establishing harm- ful error.’’ State v. Lisella, 187 Conn. 335 , 337–38, 445 A.2d	2	2013–2021
State v. Dupree green conn · 1985 2 sentences 1996State v. Dupree , 196 Conn. 655 , 664 (1985). 1996State v. Dupree , 196 Conn. 655 , 664 (1985).	2	1996–1996
Rose v. Freedom of Information Commission green conn · 1992 2 sentences 1996Rose v. Freedom of Information Commission, 221 Conn. 217 , 232 (1992); Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commission, 201 Conn. 421 , 431 (1986); Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission, 192 Conn. 310 , 315 (1984). 1. 1996Rose v. Freedom of Information Commission , 221 Conn. 217 , 232 (1992); Hartford v. Freedom of Information Commission , 201 Conn. 421 , 431 (1986); Maher v. Freedom of Information Commission , 192 Conn. 310 , 315 (1984).	2	1996–1996
Duart v. Department of Correction green conn · 2012 2 sentences 2024The court shall also consider the contribution of each of the parties in the acquisition, preservation or appreciation in value of their respective estates. . . . ‘‘While the trial court must consider the delineated statutory criteria . . . no single criterion is preferred over others, and the court is accorded wide latitude in therefore, represents a narrow exception to the general rule that the party claiming error bears the burden to demonstrate harm.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Duart v. Dept. of Correction, 303 Conn. 479, 502 , 34 A.3d 343 (2012). 2024The court shall also consider the contribution of each of the parties in the acquisition, preservation or appreciation in value of their respective estates. . . . ‘‘While the trial court must consider the delineated statutory criteria . . . no single criterion is preferred over others, and the court is accorded wide latitude in therefore, represents a narrow exception to the general rule that the party claiming error bears the burden to demonstrate harm.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Duart v. Dept. of Correction, 303 Conn. 479, 502 , 34 A.3d 343 (2012).	1	2024–2024
Furber v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act green conn · 1973 2 sentences 2022The purpose of the act is ‘‘to ameliorate the tragic consequences of unemployment’’ and ‘‘to guard against involuntary unemployment within the limitations pre- scribed.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Furber v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 164 Conn. 446, 454 , 324 A.2d 254 (1973). 2022The purpose of the act is ‘‘to ameliorate the tragic consequences of unemployment’’ and ‘‘to guard against involuntary unemployment within the limitations pre- scribed.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Furber v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 164 Conn. 446, 454 , 324 A.2d 254 (1973).	1	2022–2022
Southwest Appraisal Group, LLC v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act green conn · 2017 2 sentences 2022Accordingly, unless the party claiming the exception to the rule that service is employment shows that all three prongs of the test have been met, an employment rela- tionship will be found.’ ’’ Southwest Appraisal Group, LLC v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 324 Conn. 822, 832 , 155 A.3d 738 (2017). 2022Accordingly, unless the party claiming the exception to the rule that service is employment shows that all three prongs of the test have been met, an employment rela- tionship will be found.’ ’’ Southwest Appraisal Group, LLC v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 324 Conn. 822, 832 , 155 A.3d 738 (2017).	1	2022–2022
Cafro v. Brophy green conn · 2001 1 sentence 2021In determining whether the trial court has abused its discretion, we must make every reason- able presumption in favor of the correctness of its action.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cafro v. Brophy, 62 Conn. App. 113 , 118–19, 774 A.2d 206 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 933 , 776 A.2d 1149 (2001). ‘‘This court will affirm a trial court’s admission of rebuttal evidence which would have been normally presented as part of the case-in-chief unless the party claiming error sustains his burden of establishing harm- ful error.’’ State v. Lisella, 187 Conn. 335 , 337–38, 445 A.2d	1	2021–2021
Animal Rights Front v. Rocque green conn · 2001 1 sentence 2021In determining whether the trial court has abused its discretion, we must make every reason- able presumption in favor of the correctness of its action.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cafro v. Brophy, 62 Conn. App. 113 , 118–19, 774 A.2d 206 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 933 , 776 A.2d 1149 (2001). ‘‘This court will affirm a trial court’s admission of rebuttal evidence which would have been normally presented as part of the case-in-chief unless the party claiming error sustains his burden of establishing harm- ful error.’’ State v. Lisella, 187 Conn. 335 , 337–38, 445 A.2d	1	2021–2021
Cafro v. Brophy green connappct · 2001 2 sentences 2021In determining whether the trial court has abused its discretion, we must make every reason- able presumption in favor of the correctness of its action.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cafro v. Brophy, 62 Conn. App. 113 , 118–19, 774 A.2d 206 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 933 , 776 A.2d 1149 (2001). ‘‘This court will affirm a trial court’s admission of rebuttal evidence which would have been normally presented as part of the case-in-chief unless the party claiming error sustains his burden of establishing harm- ful error.’’ State v. Lisella, 187 Conn. 335 , 337–38, 445 A.2d 2021In determining whether the trial court has abused its discretion, we must make every reason- able presumption in favor of the correctness of its action.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cafro v. Brophy, 62 Conn. App. 113 , 118–19, 774 A.2d 206 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 933 , 776 A.2d 1149 (2001). ‘‘This court will affirm a trial court’s admission of rebuttal evidence which would have been normally presented as part of the case-in-chief unless the party claiming error sustains his burden of establishing harm- ful error.’’ State v. Lisella, 187 Conn. 335 , 337–38, 445 A.2d	1	2021–2021
Senk v. Senk green connappct · 2009 2 sentences 2019Senk v. Senk, 115 Conn. App. 510, 518 , 973 A.2d 131 (2009). ‘‘A party claiming error in an evidentiary ruling of the court must carry the burden of demonstrating that the error was harmful before a new trial may be granted. . . . 2019Senk v. Senk, 115 Conn. App. 510, 518 , 973 A.2d 131 (2009). ‘‘A party claiming error in an evidentiary ruling of the court must carry the burden of demonstrating that the error was harmful before a new trial may be granted. . . .	1	2019–2019
LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Lynch green connappct · 2010 2 sentences 2018LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Lynch , 122 Conn. App. 686 , 698, 1 A.3d 157 (2010). "[T]he appellate courts of this state have made it clear that a party cannot take a path at trial and change tactics on appeal. 2018LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Lynch , 122 Conn. App. 686 , 698, 1 A.3d 157 (2010). "[T]he appellate courts of this state have made it clear that a party cannot take a path at trial and change tactics on appeal.	1	2018–2018
JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act green conn · 2003 2 sentences 2017Accordingly, unless the party claiming the exception to the rule that service is employment shows that all three prongs of the test have been met, an employment relationship will be found." (Citation omitted.) JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Com pensation Act , supra, 265 Conn. at 418 -19 , 828 A.2d 609 . 2017Accordingly, unless the party claiming the exception to the rule that service is employment shows that all three prongs of the test have been met, an employment relationship will be found." (Citation omitted.) JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Com pensation Act , supra, 265 Conn. at 418 -19 , 828 A.2d 609 .	1	2017–2017
Ramin v. Ramin green conn · 2007 2 sentences 2012Id. 2012Id.	1	2012–2012
Snow v. Calise green conn · 1978 2 sentences 2010“It is significant to note that when such a claim [of waiver] is made, the individual conduct of each party becomes a relevant factor for our consideration.” Snow v. Calise, 174 Conn. 567, 573 , 392 A. 2d 440 (1978). 2010“It is significant to note that when such a claim [of waiver] is made, the individual conduct of each party becomes a relevant factor for our consideration.” Snow v. Calise, 174 Conn. 567, 573 , 392 A. 2d 440 (1978).	1	2010–2010
Desrosiers v. Henne green conn · 2007 2 sentences 2009Desrosiers v. Henne, 283 Conn. 361, 366 , 926 A.2d 1024 (2007). 2009Desrosiers v. Henne, 283 Conn. 361, 366 , 926 A.2d 1024 (2007).	1	2009–2009
Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. green connappct · 2002 2 sentences 2005Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 496-97 , 806 A.2d 546 , cert, denied, 262 Conn. 912 , 810 A.2d 278 (2002). 2005Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 496-97 , 806 A.2d 546 , cert, denied, 262 Conn. 912 , 810 A.2d 278 (2002).	1	2005–2005
Nusbaum & Parrino, P.C. v. Kramer green conn · 2002 1 sentence 2005Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 496-97 , 806 A.2d 546 , cert, denied, 262 Conn. 912 , 810 A.2d 278 (2002).	1	2005–2005
Kronberg Bros. v. Steele green conn · 2002	1	2005–2005
Latimer v. Administrator green conn · 1990	1	2003–2003
Board of Police Commissioners v. Freedom of Information Commission green conn · 1984	1	2000–2000
Roach v. Springfield Clinic green ill · 1993	1	1999–1999
Kane v. American National Bank & Trust Co. green illappct · 1974	1	1999–1999
State v. Krzywicki green connappct · 1995	1	1997–1997
Local 1303 & Local 1378 of Council No. 4 v. Freedom of Information Commission green conn · 1983	1	1997–1997
Liljedahl Bros. v. Grigsby green conn · 1990	1	1996–1996
Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IV green conn · 1994	1	1996–1996
Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co. green conn · 1995	1	1995–1995
Hoffman v. United States green scotus · 1951	1	1995–1995
Tunick v. Day, Berry & Howard green connsuperct · 1984	1	1995–1995
United States v. Robert C. Jones and Dona Jones green ca10 · 1983	1	1995–1995
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,406 R. Stockton Rush, III v. Oppenheimer & Co., and Scott Seskis green ca2 · 1985	1	1995–1995
Frederick J. Page, Jr. And Kristin D. Page v. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc., and Joseph McDonald green ca1 · 1986	1	1995–1995
Schnabel v. Tyler green connappct · 1993	1	1994–1994
Connecticut National Bank v. Swanney Toyota, No. 506919 (Jun. 9, 1993) neutral connsuperct · 1993	1	1994–1994

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-263 (8) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199 (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-2z (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-222 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-183 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110a (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-81 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-212a (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-265a (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-21 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-70 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 241 (1950–2026) NM 180 (1965–2026) WY 127 (1982–2026) TX 114 (1929–2026) WA 112 (1983–2026) OH 87 (1974–2026) IL 80 (1934–2026) KS 63 (1987–2026) CT 60 (1979–2025) NY 47 (1872–2025) PA 42 (1946–2026) LA 37 (1990–2026) FL 32 (1930–2026) GA 30 (1978–2024) KY 29 (2004–2026) IN 29 (1889–2025) MO 27 (1889–2025) CO 24 (1921–2025) VT 23 (1984–2026) SD 23 (1987–2018) IA 22 (1864–2026) SC 19 (1992–2019) TN 18 (1990–2026) MA 15 (1980–2023) MN 15 (1985–2017) OR 14 (1982–2023) AZ 13 (1985–2025) MS 13 (2000–2022) ID 12 (1967–2025) DE 12 (1992–2025) NJ 12 (1989–2024) MI 11 (1973–2022) MD 11 (1964–2026) AL 10 (1970–2023) WI 10 (1957–2025) UT 10 (1987–2024) NC 7 (1907–2016) MT 7 (1919–2000) RI 6 (2004–2010) ND 5 (1974–2022) NV 4 (2010–2021) AK 4 (1973–2025) ME 4 (1978–2023) DC 4 (1986–2009) NH 3 (1998–2014) VA 3 (1996–2025) WV 3 (1992–2024) HI 3 (2014–2023) AR 2 (1983–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check