Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dingle v. Stategreen2 sentences2013The trial court “need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward revealing cause for disqualification.” Dingle, 361 Md. at 13-14 , 759 A.2d 819 . 2013The trial court “need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward revealing cause for disqualification.” Dingle, 361 Md. at 13-14 , 759 A.2d 819 . | 4 | 9 |
McGee v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Dingle, 361 Md. at 14 , 759 A.2d 819 , both cited and quoted with approval from McGee v. State, 219 Md. 53, 58-59 , 146 A.2d 194 (1959). 2003Dingle, 361 Md. at 14 , 759 A.2d 819 , both cited and quoted with approval from McGee v. State, 219 Md. 53, 58-59 , 146 A.2d 194 (1959). | 2 | 3 |
Whittemore v. Stategreen2 sentences2002Thus, “[questions not directed to a specific ground for disqualification but which are speculative, inquisitorial, catechis-ing or ‘fishing’, asked in aid of deciding on peremptory challenges, may be refused in the discretion of the court, even though it would not have been error to have asked them.” McGee v. State, 219 Md. 53, 58 , 146 A.2d 194, 196 (1959); see Whittemore v. State, 151 Md. 309, 315-16 , 134 A. 322, 324 (1926) (trial court properly exercised its discretion in excluding questioning concerning the juror’s age because the questions were “for no specified purpose, and apparently w 2002Thus, “[questions not directed to a specific ground for disqualification but which are speculative, inquisitorial, catechis-ing or ‘fishing’, asked in aid of deciding on peremptory challenges, may be refused in the discretion of the court, even though it would not have been error to have asked them.” McGee v. State, 219 Md. 53, 58 , 146 A.2d 194, 196 (1959); see Whittemore v. State, 151 Md. 309, 315-16 , 134 A. 322, 324 (1926) (trial court properly exercised its discretion in excluding questioning concerning the juror’s age because the questions were “for no specified purpose, and apparently w | 1 | 1 |
Perry v. Stategreen2 sentences2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. 2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. | 1 | 1 |
Burch v. Stategreen2 sentences2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. 2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stewart v. State
green
2 sentences2009Concomitantly, the trial judge, in the exercise of his or her discretion, “need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward revealing cause for disqualification.” Dingle, 361 Md. at 13-14 , 759 A.2d 819 . “[T]he exercise of discretion by trial judges with respect to the particular questions to ask and areas to cover in voir dire is entitled to considerable deference.” Stewart, supra, 399 Md. at 160 , 923 A.2d 44 . 2009Concomitantly, the trial judge, in the exercise of his or her discretion, “need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward revealing cause for disqualification.” Dingle, 361 Md. at 13-14 , 759 A.2d 819 . “[T]he exercise of discretion by trial judges with respect to the particular questions to ask and areas to cover in voir dire is entitled to considerable deference.” Stewart, supra, 399 Md. at 160 , 923 A.2d 44 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Thomas v. State
green
1 sentence2024Thomas, 454 Md. at 504 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Boyd v. State
green
2 sentences2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. 2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Davis v. State
red
2 sentences2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. 2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Hill v. State
green
2 sentences2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. 2000It is also well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in the conduct of voir dire, most especially with regard to the scope and the form of the questions propounded, see Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 293 , 696 A.2d 443, 463 (1997); Perry v. State, 344 Md. 204, 218 , 686 A.2d 274, 280 (1996); Boyd, 341 Md. at 436 , 671 A.2d at 35 ; Hill, 339 Md. at 279 , 661 A.2d at 1166 ; Davis, 333 Md. at 34 , 633 A.2d at 870-71 , and that it need not make any particular inquiry of the prospective jurors unless that inquiry is directed toward re vealing cause for disqualification. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.