Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chaney v. Stategreen2 sentences2020We have previously stated that “[t]he scope of this privilege, allowing collateral and belated attacks on the sentence and excluding waiver as a bar to relief, is narrow.” Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 466 , 918 A.2d 506 , (2007) (emphasis omitted). 2020We have previously stated that “[t]he scope of this privilege, allowing collateral and belated attacks on the sentence and excluding waiver as a bar to relief, is narrow.” Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 466 , 918 A.2d 506 , (2007) (emphasis omitted). | 4 | 10 |
Pollard v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See also Pollard v. State, 394 Md. 40, 42 , 904 A.2d 500, 501 (2006) (holding that “[t]he sentence imposed was neither illegal, in excess of that prescribed for the offense for which Petitioner was convicted, nor were the terms of the sentence itself statutorily or constitutionally invalid”). 2014See also Pollard v. State, 394 Md. 40, 42 , 904 A.2d 500, 501 (2006) (holding that “[t]he sentence imposed was neither illegal, in excess of that prescribed for the offense for which Petitioner was convicted, nor were the terms of the sentence itself statutorily or constitutionally invalid”). | 2 | 2 |
Baker v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 407 Md. 137 , 141 n. 4, 963 A.2d 197 , 199 n. 4 (2009) (“Historically, ... a motion to correct an illegal sentence ... “was entertained only where the alleged illegality was in the sentence itself or the sentence never should have been imposed,’ ” quoting Baker v. State, 389 Md. 127, 133 , 883 A.2d 916, 919 (2005)); Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 466 , 918 A.2d 506, 509-510 (2007) (“The scope of this privilege, allowing collateral and belated attacks on the sentence and excluding waiver as a bar to relief, is narrow, however. 2012See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 407 Md. 137 , 141 n. 4, 963 A.2d 197 , 199 n. 4 (2009) (“Historically, ... a motion to correct an illegal sentence ... “was entertained only where the alleged illegality was in the sentence itself or the sentence never should have been imposed,’ ” quoting Baker v. State, 389 Md. 127, 133 , 883 A.2d 916, 919 (2005)); Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 466 , 918 A.2d 506, 509-510 (2007) (“The scope of this privilege, allowing collateral and belated attacks on the sentence and excluding waiver as a bar to relief, is narrow, however. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Griffithsgreen2 sentences2014See Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 466 , 918 A.2d 506, 509-10 (2007) (“The scope of this privilege, allowing collateral and belated attacks on the sentence and excluding waiver as a bar to relief, is narrow, however.”) (emphasis in original); State v. Griffiths, 338 Md. 485, 496 , 659 A.2d 876, 882 (1995) (“Rule [4-345(a) ] creates a limited exception to the general rule of finality[.]”). 4 “We have consistently defined this category of ‘illegal sen tence’ as limited to those situations in which the illegality inheres in the sentence itself; i. e., there either has been no conviction warranting 2014See Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 466 , 918 A.2d 506, 509-10 (2007) (“The scope of this privilege, allowing collateral and belated attacks on the sentence and excluding waiver as a bar to relief, is narrow, however.”) (emphasis in original); State v. Griffiths, 338 Md. 485, 496 , 659 A.2d 876, 882 (1995) (“Rule [4-345(a) ] creates a limited exception to the general rule of finality[.]”). 4 “We have consistently defined this category of ‘illegal sen tence’ as limited to those situations in which the illegality inheres in the sentence itself; i. e., there either has been no conviction warranting | 1 | 1 |
ABDUL-MALEEK v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See Abdul-Maleek v. State, 426 Md. 59, 69 , 43 A.3d 383, 389 (2012). 8 imposed and, for either reason, is intrinsically and substantively unlawful.” Chaney, 397 Md. at 466 , 918 A.2d at 510 . 2014See Abdul-Maleek v. State, 426 Md. 59, 69 , 43 A.3d 383, 389 (2012). 8 imposed and, for either reason, is intrinsically and substantively unlawful.” Chaney, 397 Md. at 466 , 918 A.2d at 510 . | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 407 Md. 137 , 141 n. 4, 963 A.2d 197 , 199 n. 4 (2009) (“Historically, ... a motion to correct an illegal sentence ... “was entertained only where the alleged illegality was in the sentence itself or the sentence never should have been imposed,’ ” quoting Baker v. State, 389 Md. 127, 133 , 883 A.2d 916, 919 (2005)); Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 466 , 918 A.2d 506, 509-510 (2007) (“The scope of this privilege, allowing collateral and belated attacks on the sentence and excluding waiver as a bar to relief, is narrow, however. 2012See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 407 Md. 137 , 141 n. 4, 963 A.2d 197 , 199 n. 4 (2009) (“Historically, ... a motion to correct an illegal sentence ... “was entertained only where the alleged illegality was in the sentence itself or the sentence never should have been imposed,’ ” quoting Baker v. State, 389 Md. 127, 133 , 883 A.2d 916, 919 (2005)); Chaney v. State, 397 Md. 460, 466 , 918 A.2d 506, 509-510 (2007) (“The scope of this privilege, allowing collateral and belated attacks on the sentence and excluding waiver as a bar to relief, is narrow, however. | 1 | 1 |
Evans v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Evans v. State, 389 Md. 456, 463 , 886 A.2d 562, 565 (2005); Baker v. State, 389 Md. 127, 133 , 883 A.2d 916, 919 (2005); Randall Book Corp. v. State, 316 Md. 315, 321-23 , 558 A.2d 715, 718-19 (1989). 2010See Evans v. State, 389 Md. 456, 463 , 886 A.2d 562, 565 (2005); Baker v. State, 389 Md. 127, 133 , 883 A.2d 916, 919 (2005); Randall Book Corp. v. State, 316 Md. 315, 321-23 , 558 A.2d 715, 718-19 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Randall Book Corp. v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Evans v. State, 389 Md. 456, 463 , 886 A.2d 562, 565 (2005); Baker v. State, 389 Md. 127, 133 , 883 A.2d 916, 919 (2005); Randall Book Corp. v. State, 316 Md. 315, 321-23 , 558 A.2d 715, 718-19 (1989). 2010See Evans v. State, 389 Md. 456, 463 , 886 A.2d 562, 565 (2005); Baker v. State, 389 Md. 127, 133 , 883 A.2d 916, 919 (2005); Randall Book Corp. v. State, 316 Md. 315, 321-23 , 558 A.2d 715, 718-19 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wilkins
green
2 sentences2020“In other words, a motion to correct an illegal sentence is not an alternative method of obtaining belated appellate review of the proceedings that led to the imposition of judgment and sentence in a criminal case.” State v. Wilkins, 393 Md. 269, 273 , 900 A.2d 765 (2006). 2020“In other words, a motion to correct an illegal sentence is not an alternative method of obtaining belated appellate review of the proceedings that led to the imposition of judgment and sentence in a criminal case.” State v. Wilkins, 393 Md. 269, 273 , 900 A.2d 765 (2006). | 2 | 2019–2020 |