Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1965–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hospital Employees' Division of Local 79 v. Flint Osteopathic Hospitalgreen2 sentences1996Concerning the merc’s authority under § 13 of the pera to determine an appropriate collective bargaining unit, this Court has said: The appellate courts of this state will hesitate to substitute a judicial judgment of the appropriate unit for merc’s determination, and will do so reluctantly and only upon a clear showing of error. [Hospital Employees Div of Local 79, Service Employees’ Int’l Union, AFL-CIO v Flint Osteopathic Hosp, 390 Mich 635, 638 ; 212 NW2d 897 (1973).] Where a statutory construction by the MERC has endured for a long time, it should be accorded significant weight by a revie 1996Concerning the merc’s authority under § 13 of the pera to determine an appropriate collective bargaining unit, this Court has said: The appellate courts of this state will hesitate to substitute a judicial judgment of the appropriate unit for merc’s determination, and will do so reluctantly and only upon a clear showing of error. [Hospital Employees Div of Local 79, Service Employees’ Int’l Union, AFL-CIO v Flint Osteopathic Hosp, 390 Mich 635, 638 ; 212 NW2d 897 (1973).] Where a statutory construction by the MERC has endured for a long time, it should be accorded significant weight by a revie | 2 | 5 |
Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Grosse Pointe Farmsgreen2 sentences2015This Court will reverse a MERC determination of an appropriate bargaining unit only upon a clear showing of error.” Police Officers Ass’n of Mich v Grosse Pointe Farms, 197 Mich App 730, 735 ; 496 NW2d 794 (1993) (citation omitted). 2015This Court will reverse a MERC determination of an appropriate bargaining unit only upon a clear showing of error.” Police Officers Ass’n of Mich v Grosse Pointe Farms, 197 Mich App 730, 735 ; 496 NW2d 794 (1993) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Labor Council, Michigan Fraternal Order of Police v. Emmett Townshipgreen2 sentences1993Id., p 374; Emmett Twp , p 518. 1993Muskegon, supra, Emmett Twp, supra. The city argues on appeal that the merc erred in determining that the former fire chief, who was not trained for police Work or made part of the poam’s unit clarification petition, should be included in the public safety bargaining unit represented by the poam. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Muskegon County Professional Command Ass'n v. County of Muskegon
green
2 sentences1998Id. [ [8] ] [ Muskegon Co Professional Command Ass'n, supra at 374, 464 N.W.2d 908 .] See also Hosp. 1993Muskegon, supra, Emmett Twp, supra. The city argues on appeal that the merc erred in determining that the former fire chief, who was not trained for police Work or made part of the poam’s unit clarification petition, should be included in the public safety bargaining unit represented by the poam. | 2 | 1993–1998 |
Faust Public Library v. Afscme Council 25
green
2 sentences2018AFSCME Council 25 v Faust Pub Library, 311 Mich App 449, 453 ; 875 NW2d 254 (2015). 2018AFSCME Council 25 v Faust Pub Library, 311 Mich App 449, 453 ; 875 NW2d 254 (2015). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Michigan Education Ass'n v. Clare-Gladwin Intermediate School District
green
2 sentences2015“The Legislature has segregated supervisory and executive personnel from other personnel for purposes of collective bargaining.” Mich Ed Ass’n v Clare-Gladwin Intermediate Sch Dist, 153 Mich App 792, 795 ; 396 NW2d 538 (1986); see also Grosse Pointe Farms, 197 Mich App at 733 (“Generally, supervisory employees are not included in the same bargaining unit as nonsupervisory personnel.”). 2015“The Legislature has segregated supervisory and executive personnel from other personnel for purposes of collective bargaining.” Mich Ed Ass’n v Clare-Gladwin Intermediate Sch Dist, 153 Mich App 792, 795 ; 396 NW2d 538 (1986); see also Grosse Pointe Farms, 197 Mich App at 733 (“Generally, supervisory employees are not included in the same bargaining unit as nonsupervisory personnel.”). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. City of Sterling Heights
neutral
1 sentence1998Id. [ [8] ] [ Muskegon Co Professional Command Ass'n, supra at 374, 464 N.W.2d 908 .] See also Hosp. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Southfield Police Officers Ass'n v. Southfield
green
2 sentences1996Southfield Police Officers Ass’n v Southfield, 433 Mich 168, 176-177 ; 445 NW2d 98 (1989). 1996Southfield Police Officers Ass’n v Southfield, 433 Mich 168, 176-177 ; 445 NW2d 98 (1989). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Lansing School District v. Michigan Employment Relations Commission
green
2 sentences1990This Court will only reverse a merc determination of an appropriate bargaining unit "upon a clear showing of error.” Lansing School Dist v MERC, 117 Mich App 486, 493 ; 324 NW2d 62 (1982). 1990This Court will only reverse a merc determination of an appropriate bargaining unit "upon a clear showing of error.” Lansing School Dist v MERC, 117 Mich App 486, 493 ; 324 NW2d 62 (1982). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Michigan Ass'n of Public Employees v. Michigan AFSCME Council 25
green
1 sentence1990Id. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Hotel Olds v. State Labor Mediation Board
neutral
2 sentences1975The Supreme Court said in Hotel Olds v State Labor Mediation Board, 333 Mich 382, 387 ; 53 NW2d 302 (1952): "In designating bargaining units as appropriate, a primary objective of the commission is to constitute the largest unit which, in the circumstances of the particular case, is most compatible with the effectuation of the purposes of the law and to include in a single unit all common interests.” In Hospital Employees' Division of Local 79, Service Employees' International Union, AFL-CIO v Flint Osteopathic Hospital, 390 Mich 635, 638 ; 212 NW2d 897 (1973), the Supreme Court said: "The app 1975The Supreme Court said in Hotel Olds v State Labor Mediation Board, 333 Mich 382, 387 ; 53 NW2d 302 (1952): "In designating bargaining units as appropriate, a primary objective of the commission is to constitute the largest unit which, in the circumstances of the particular case, is most compatible with the effectuation of the purposes of the law and to include in a single unit all common interests.” In Hospital Employees' Division of Local 79, Service Employees' International Union, AFL-CIO v Flint Osteopathic Hospital, 390 Mich 635, 638 ; 212 NW2d 897 (1973), the Supreme Court said: "The app | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Leski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
1 sentence1965Gocha v. Fetterolf (1961), 363 Mich 344 ; Leski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (1962), 367 Mich 560 . | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Gocha v. Fetterolf
neutral
1 sentence1965Gocha v. Fetterolf (1961), 363 Mich 344 ; Leski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (1962), 367 Mich 560 . | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.