Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thomas v. Department of State Highwaysgreen2 sentences1976In Thomas v Department of State Highways, 398 Mich 1 ; 247 NW2d 530 (1976), we are faced with a statutory grant of immunity. 1976In Thomas v Department of State Highways, 398 Mich 1 ; 247 NW2d 530 (1976), we are faced with a statutory grant of immunity. | 1 | 2 |
Pittman v. City of Taylorgreen2 sentences1978See footnote 1. 3 "The holding we announce today is prospective, with the exception of the instant case and any cases now pending in which an express challenge to the common-law defense of governmental immunity had been made and preserved.” (Emphasis supplied.) Pittman v City of Taylor, 398 Mich 41, 50 ; 247 NW2d 512 (1976). 4 Evidently the plaintiffs’ attorneys erroneously believed that a statutory grant of state immunity from liability may have been in existence at the time of the accident. 5 It is firmly established that state agencies are entitled to immunity from liability only when they 1978See footnote 1. 3 "The holding we announce today is prospective, with the exception of the instant case and any cases now pending in which an express challenge to the common-law defense of governmental immunity had been made and preserved.” (Emphasis supplied.) Pittman v City of Taylor, 398 Mich 41, 50 ; 247 NW2d 512 (1976). 4 Evidently the plaintiffs’ attorneys erroneously believed that a statutory grant of state immunity from liability may have been in existence at the time of the accident. 5 It is firmly established that state agencies are entitled to immunity from liability only when they | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Odom v. Wayne County
green
2 sentences2026In Odom, 482 Mich at 470 , the Michigan Supreme Court explained that MCL 691.1407(2) included only negligent and not intentional torts. “[T]he Legislature thereby removed immunity for intentional tort liability from the statutory grant of immunity in subsection 2.” Id. 2026In Odom, 482 Mich at 470 , the Michigan Supreme Court explained that MCL 691.1407(2) included only negligent and not intentional torts. “[T]he Legislature thereby removed immunity for intentional tort liability from the statutory grant of immunity in subsection 2.” Id. | 3 | 2018–2026 |
Ross v. Consumers Power Co.
yellow
2 sentences2018“The seminal pre-July 7, 1986, case defining the parameters of governmental immunity for individuals from tort liability is Ross v Consumers Power Co (On Rehearing)[, 420 Mich 567 ; 363 NW2d 641 (1984)].” Odom, 482 Mich at 472 . 2018“The seminal pre-July 7, 1986, case defining the parameters of governmental immunity for individuals from tort liability is Ross v Consumers Power Co (On Rehearing)[, 420 Mich 567 ; 363 NW2d 641 (1984)].” Odom, 482 Mich at 472 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Warner v. Mitts
green
1 sentence2002Id. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Knight v. Limbert
green
2 sentences1992Knight v Limbert, 170 Mich App 410, 414 ; 427 NW2d 637 (1988). 1992Knight v Limbert, 170 Mich App 410, 414 ; 427 NW2d 637 (1988). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Maki v. City of East Tawas
green
2 sentences1987In Maki v East Tawas, 385 Mich 151 ; 188 NW2d 593 (1971), aff'g 18 Mich App 109 ; 170 NW2d 530 (1969), this Court affirmed a Court of Appeals determination that *338 the statutory grant of immunity to governmental agencies in § 7 of 1964 PA 170 offended the title-object clause of Const 1963, art 4, § 24. 1987In Maki v East Tawas, 385 Mich 151 ; 188 NW2d 593 (1971), aff'g 18 Mich App 109 ; 170 NW2d 530 (1969), this Court affirmed a Court of Appeals determination that *338 the statutory grant of immunity to governmental agencies in § 7 of 1964 PA 170 offended the title-object clause of Const 1963, art 4, § 24. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Maki v. City of East Tawas
green
2 sentences1987In Maki v East Tawas, 385 Mich 151 ; 188 NW2d 593 (1971), aff'g 18 Mich App 109 ; 170 NW2d 530 (1969), this Court affirmed a Court of Appeals determination that *338 the statutory grant of immunity to governmental agencies in § 7 of 1964 PA 170 offended the title-object clause of Const 1963, art 4, § 24. 1987In Maki v East Tawas, 385 Mich 151 ; 188 NW2d 593 (1971), aff'g 18 Mich App 109 ; 170 NW2d 530 (1969), this Court affirmed a Court of Appeals determination that *338 the statutory grant of immunity to governmental agencies in § 7 of 1964 PA 170 offended the title-object clause of Const 1963, art 4, § 24. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Jackson v. Secretary of State
neutral
2 sentences1983Jackson v Secretary of State, 105 Mich App 132, 138 ; 306 NW2d 422 (1981). 1983Jackson v Secretary of State, 105 Mich App 132, 138 ; 306 NW2d 422 (1981). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Shavers v. Attorney General
green
2 sentences1979In Shavers v Attorney General, 402 Mich 554 , 613 n 37; 267 NW2d 72 (1978), the Court considered Michigan’s no-fault automobile insurance statute experimental since it had only been in effect for five years. 1979In Shavers v Attorney General, 402 Mich 554 , 613 n 37; 267 NW2d 72 (1978), the Court considered Michigan’s no-fault automobile insurance statute experimental since it had only been in effect for five years. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Daszkiewicz v. Detroit Board of Education
green
2 sentences1978See Thomas v Department of State Highways, 398 Mich 1, 11 ; 247 NW2d 530 (1976); Manion v State Highway Commissioner, 303 Mich 1, 19 ; 5 NW2d 527 (1942); Daszkiewicz v Detroit Board of Education, 301 Mich 212, 220 ; 3 NW2d 71 (1942). 1978See Thomas v Department of State Highways, 398 Mich 1, 11 ; 247 NW2d 530 (1976); Manion v State Highway Commissioner, 303 Mich 1, 19 ; 5 NW2d 527 (1942); Daszkiewicz v Detroit Board of Education, 301 Mich 212, 220 ; 3 NW2d 71 (1942). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Manion v. State Highway Commissioner
green
2 sentences1978See Thomas v Department of State Highways, 398 Mich 1, 11 ; 247 NW2d 530 (1976); Manion v State Highway Commissioner, 303 Mich 1, 19 ; 5 NW2d 527 (1942); Daszkiewicz v Detroit Board of Education, 301 Mich 212, 220 ; 3 NW2d 71 (1942). 1978See Thomas v Department of State Highways, 398 Mich 1, 11 ; 247 NW2d 530 (1976); Manion v State Highway Commissioner, 303 Mich 1, 19 ; 5 NW2d 527 (1942); Daszkiewicz v Detroit Board of Education, 301 Mich 212, 220 ; 3 NW2d 71 (1942). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Buddy v. Department of Natural Resources
green
2 sentences1977Buddy v Department of Natural Resources, 59 Mich App 598 ; 229 NW2d 865 (1975). 1977Buddy v Department of Natural Resources, 59 Mich App 598 ; 229 NW2d 865 (1975). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.