weight given factors (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

weight given factors in Missouri

11 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Kester v. Kestergreen
moctapp · 2003 · cited in 5 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2004–2009
2 sentences

2009Kester v. Kester, 108 S.W.3d 213, 224 (Mo.App.2003). “ ‘Disparity in the value of marital property awarded each spouse is justified if any of the relevant factors, statutory or otherwise, justify an unequal division.’ ” Long, 135 S.W.3d at 542 (quoting Hayes v. Hayes, 792 S.W.2d 428, 431 (Mo.App.1990)).

2009Kester v. Kester, 108 S.W.3d 213, 224 (Mo.App.2003). “ ‘Disparity in the value of marital property awarded each spouse is justified if any of the relevant factors, statutory or otherwise, justify an unequal division.’ ” Long, 135 S.W.3d at 542 (quoting Hayes v. Hayes, 792 S.W.2d 428, 431 (Mo.App.1990)).

55
Long v. Longgreen
moctapp · 2004 · cited in 4 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2009–2014
2 sentences

2014Jones v. Jones, 277 S.W.3d 330, 337 (Mo.App.2009). “ ‘Disparity in the value of marital property awarded each spouse is justified if any of the relevant factors, statutory or otherwise, justify an unequal division.’ ” Long, 135 S.W.3d at 542 (citation omitted).

2014Jones v. Jones, 277 S.W.3d 330, 337 (Mo. App. 2009). "'Disparity in the value of marital property awarded each spouse is justified if any of the relevant factors, statutory or otherwise, justify an unequal division.'" Long, 135 S.W.3d at 542 (citation omitted).

24
State v. Williamsgreen
mo · 2018 · cited in 3 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2018–2023
2 sentences

2023State v. Williams, 548 S.W.3d 275, 288 (Mo. banc 2018).

2020Thus, 19 the Court cautioned that “the factors set forth in this opinion, and the weight given to those factors, are merely illustrative of the legal relevance analysis article I, section 18(c) requires.” Id.

23
Jones v. Jonesgreen
moctapp · 2009 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Jones v. Jones, 277 S.W.3d 330, 337 (Mo.App.2009). “ ‘Disparity in the value of marital property awarded each spouse is justified if any of the relevant factors, statutory or otherwise, justify an unequal division.’ ” Long, 135 S.W.3d at 542 (citation omitted).

2014Jones v. Jones, 277 S.W.3d 330, 337 (Mo. App. 2009). "'Disparity in the value of marital property awarded each spouse is justified if any of the relevant factors, statutory or otherwise, justify an unequal division.'" Long, 135 S.W.3d at 542 (citation omitted).

22
Hayes v. Hayesgreen
moctapp · 1990 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009Kester v. Kester, 108 S.W.3d 213, 224 (Mo.App.2003). “ ‘Disparity in the value of marital property awarded each spouse is justified if any of the relevant factors, statutory or otherwise, justify an unequal division.’ ” Long, 135 S.W.3d at 542 (quoting Hayes v. Hayes, 792 S.W.2d 428, 431 (Mo.App.1990)).

2009Kester v. Kester, 108 S.W.3d 213, 224 (Mo.App.2003). “ ‘Disparity in the value of marital property awarded each spouse is justified if any of the relevant factors, statutory or otherwise, justify an unequal division.’ ” Long, 135 S.W.3d at 542 (quoting Hayes v. Hayes, 792 S.W.2d 428, 431 (Mo.App.1990)).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Woolridge v. Woolridge green
moctapp · 1996
1 sentence

2004Id.

12004–2004

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.330 (6) MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.335 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 14 (2012–2025) MO 11 (2004–2023) NC 5 (2008–2025) IL 4 (2018–2026) TN 4 (1997–2019) TX 3 (1988–2021) UT 3 (1989–2012) CA 3 (2021–2024) IN 3 (2011–2020) ND 3 (2005–2019) WI 2 (2021–2021) MA 2 (2025–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check