11 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1952–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Siligato v. Stategreen2 sentences2025Court Rules, cmt. 4 on R. 4:9-3 (2012)); see also Siligato v. State, 268 N.J. 2013In Siligato, supra, 268 N.J.Super. at 28-29 , 632 A.2d 837 , the Appellate Division considered an error in the designation of the plaintiff. | 1 | 2 |
American Bank & Trust Co. of Pennsylvania v. Lottgreen1 sentence1987Accordingly, unless the Reporting Act is deemed unconstitutional, plaintiff is barred from maintaining its foreclosure suit. [5] As we recognized in American Bank & Trust Co. of Pennsylvania v. Lott, 99 N.J. 32, 39 (1985): This exception for timely filing a relevant corporate tax return underscores the basic purpose of the Reporting Act, which is to provide the Division of Taxation with information to determine the tax liability of foreign corporations. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carrino v. Novotny
green
1 sentence2025"The Rule 'has also been applied to an amendment re- identifying the party making the claim provided all of the conditions of the rule are satisfied.'" Ibid. (quoting Pressler & Verniero, Current N.J. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Prime Accounting Department v. Township of Carney's Point
green
1 sentence2023R. 4:9-1 “has also been applied to an amendment re-identifying the party making the claim provided all of the conditions of the rule are satisfied.” Ibid. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. JM
green
2 sentences2012J.M., supra, 182 N.J. at 412 , 866 A.2d 178 . 2012J.M., supra, 182 N.J. at 412 , 866 A.2d 178 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Charles E. Stoner, Jr. v. Dewey Sowders, Warden
green
1 sentence2003Stoner v. Sowders, supra, 997 F. 2d, at 212-13 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Winberry v. Salisbury
green
2 sentences1992Initially, I note that any statute which attempts to impose sanctions in the form of fees is subject to attack on the grounds that it impermissibly intrudes upon the Supreme Court's constitutional right to regulate the practice of law in violation of the principles set out in Winberry v. Salisbury, 5 N.J. 240 , 74 A. 2d 406 (1950). 1992Initially, I note that any statute which attempts to impose sanctions in the form of fees is subject to attack on the grounds that it impermissibly intrudes upon the Supreme Court's constitutional right to regulate the practice of law in violation of the principles set out in Winberry v. Salisbury, 5 N.J. 240 , 74 A. 2d 406 (1950). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
TRUSTEES, CLIENTS'SEC. FUND OF BAR v. Beckmann
green
1 sentence1989Nevertheless, and apart from the Supreme Court's delegated powers to regulate the conduct and affairs of attorneys, it is generally acknowledged that special circumstances justify the use of court's inherent equity powers to take custody of and preserve the assets of individuals, especially where claimants may otherwise be prejudiced by misconduct of a fiduciary. 4 Pomeroy's Equity Jurisprudence (5 ed. 1941), Sec. 1334. [ Id. at 553-554, 364 A. 2d 15 ] R. 1:28-8 authorizes the Trustees of the CSF on the conditions stated in the rule to apply for "the appointment of a custodial receiver to take | 1 | 1989–1989 |
United States v. Ralph Petrozziello
green
2 sentences1984United States v. Macklin, 573 F. 2d 1046 , 1049 n. 3 (8th Cir.1978); United States v. Petrozziello, supra, 548 F. 2d at 23 n. 3. 1984United States v. Macklin, 573 F.2d 1046 , 1049 n. 3 (8th Cir.1978); United States v. Petrozziello, supra, 548 F.2d at 23 n. 3. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
United States v. Carmell MacKlin
green
2 sentences1984United States v. Macklin, 573 F. 2d 1046 , 1049 n. 3 (8th Cir.1978); United States v. Petrozziello, supra, 548 F. 2d at 23 n. 3. 1984United States v. Macklin, 573 F.2d 1046 , 1049 n. 3 (8th Cir.1978); United States v. Petrozziello, supra, 548 F.2d at 23 n. 3. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Cerbo
green
1 sentence1980And `[w]hen the federal and state constitutions protect the individual's right of privacy and the Legislature has seen fit to prescribe an all-inclusive safeguard against wiretaps, it is fitting and proper to hold that the prosecutor comply fully with the conditions under which an exception to the general prohibitions may be permitted.' [ Id. at 604 ; citation omitted] *394 The State's contention that the 30-day delay in presenting the Greenhause tapes for sealing is satisfactorily explained, and hence excused, by a newly instituted work procedure which required the completion of newly develop | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Stone v. Cray
green
2 sentences1952"A literal enforcement of the ordinance may be disregarded to permit a variance, while the conditions for an exception must be found in the ordinance and may not be varied." Stone v. Cray, 89 N.H. 483 , 200 A. 517 ( Sup. Ct. 1938). 1952"A literal enforcement of the ordinance may be disregarded to permit a variance, while the conditions for an exception must be found in the ordinance and may not be varied." Stone v. Cray, 89 N.H. 483 , 200 A. 517 ( Sup. Ct. 1938). | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.