7 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1904–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Stanislawskigreen2 sentences1981We upheld the trial court's limiting the defendant's attack on the stipulated polygraph evidence in the trial to the jury to cross-examination of the polygraph witness as to "(a) the examiner's qualifications and training; (b) the conditions under which the test was administered; (c) the limitations of and possibilities for error in the technique of polygraphic interrogation; and (d) at the discretion of the trial court, any other matters deemed pertinent to the inquiry." Stanislawski, supra, 62 Wis.2d at 742-743. 1981We upheld the trial court’s limiting the defendant’s attack on the stipulated polygraph evidence in the trial to the jury to cross-examination of the polygraph witness as to “ (a) the examiner’s qualifications and training; (b) the conditions under which the test was administered; (c) the limitations of and possibilities for error in the technique of polygraphic interrogation; and (d) at the discretion of the trial court, any other matters deemed pertinent to the inquiry.” Stanislawski, supra, 62 Wis.2d at 742-743. | 1 | 2 |
Menendez v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1999Menendez v. Superior Court, 834 P.2d 786, 794 (Cal. 1992) (citing People v. Wharton, 809 P.2d 290 (Cal. 1991)) (emphasis added). 1999Menendez v. Superior Court, 834 P.2d 786, 794 (Cal. 1992) (citing People v. Wharton, 809 P.2d 290 (Cal. 1991)) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dean
green
2 sentences2020Thus, the “interaction of the examinee and the examiner and the conditions in which the test is given all play a critical role in the polygraph test.” Id. 2020In addition, the test’s reliability “depends on the examinee’s biological and psychological makeup,” as well as “[t]he examiner’s training, competence, experience, integrity and conduct during the test.” Id. at 236 . 32 No. 2018AP2220-CR Moreover, “[a] crucial part of the testing and of the interpretation of the physiological data is the examiner’s evaluation of the examinee’s visible behavior, such as squirming, coughing, sniffing, and hesitancy.” Id. at 237 . ¶78 The Dean court explained that, in light of the above considerations, [t]he determination of truth or deception cannot be made dire | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Weed
green
1 sentence2003However, as we have stated above, in Stevens, 171 Wis. 2d at 119 , we held that the exception "does not apply to the aural perception of an oral statement privately told to a person." The State's reading of Stevens — that "event or condition" may include a private oral statement aurally perceived if there is corroboration — is not viable after Weed, 263 Wis. 2d 434 , ¶ 21 n.6. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Stevens
green
1 sentence2003However, as we have stated above, in Stevens, 171 Wis. 2d at 119 , we held that the exception "does not apply to the aural perception of an oral statement privately told to a person." The State's reading of Stevens — that "event or condition" may include a private oral statement aurally perceived if there is corroboration — is not viable after Weed, 263 Wis. 2d 434 , ¶ 21 n.6. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Wharton
green
2 sentences1999Menendez v. Superior Court, 834 P.2d 786, 794 (Cal. 1992) (citing People v. Wharton, 809 P.2d 290 (Cal. 1991)) (emphasis added). 1999Menendez v. Superior Court, 834 P.2d 786, 794 (Cal. 1992) (citing People v. Wharton, 809 P.2d 290 (Cal. 1991)) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Marcus
neutral
1 sentence1953Jur., Automobiles, p. 593, sec. 157: ‘It is competent for the legislature to prescribe the conditions under which the privilege of operating an automobile on the public highways may be exercised.’ ” (State v. Marcus, 259 Wis. 543, 550 .) Following that rule, we stated (p. 550) : “ ‘This regulatory power, like all other phases of the police power, is legislative and administrative, and when properly exercised presents no occasion for the exercise of the judicial power.’ ” Consequently, in that respect, the decision in State v. Marcus, supra, completely disposes of the trial court’s contention t | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Locke v. Williamson
green
1 sentence1904Thus the original casé in this court denies right of reliance “when the defects in the goods are patent and obvious to the senses, when the purchaser has a full opportunity for examination.” Locke v. Williamson, 40 Wis. 377, 379 . | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.