21 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1937–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Campbellgreen2 sentences2011Coleman v. Dret-ke, 395 F.3d 216 , 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) ("Coleman’s holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all.”). 2011Coleman v. Dretke, 395 F.3d 216, 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) (" Coleman's holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all."). | 2 | 2 |
Coleman v. Dretkegreen2 sentences2011Coleman v. Dret-ke, 395 F.3d 216 , 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) ("Coleman’s holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all.”). 2011Coleman v. Dretke, 395 F.3d 216, 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) (" Coleman's holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all."). | 2 | 2 |
Brinson Ford, Inc. v. Algergreen1 sentence2024We have, however, consistently held that common or innocuous hazards are not unreasonably dangerous as a matter of law. 1 Under this doctrine of common conditions, the standalone fact that a condition has caused an 1 See, e.g., Christ v. Tex. Dep’t of Transp., 664 S.W.3d 82 , 85, 87, 90 (Tex. 2023) (concluding that the use of painted stripes and buttons instead of concrete barriers to separate travel lanes did not create an unreasonably dangerous condition as a matter of law); McIntire, 646 S.W.3d at 801-04 (concluding that a “profoundly ordinary” divot in a grocery store parking lot was not u | 1 | 1 |
Zachry Construction Corporation v. Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texasgreen1 sentence2019However, Zachry stated, “[t]he Act waives immunity for contract claims that meet certain conditions: the existence of a specific type of contract [referring to section 271.157], a demand for certain kinds of damages [referring to section 271.153], a state forum [referring to section 271.156], etc.” Zachry, 449 S.W.3d at 109 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Fischer v. CTMI, L.L.C.green1 sentence2018See id. | 1 | 1 |
Price v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.green1 sentence2001See Price v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 700 S.W.2d 730, 733 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1985, no writ)(since trial court initially reinstated case, court of appeals presumed appropriate findings were made). | 1 | 1 |
Pettit v. Stategreen1 sentence1993See Pettit, supra. We find that the evidence was sufficient to establish the elements of the offense of unlawfully carrying a weapon and to defeat Moosani’s defense. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. State
green
2 sentences2002We are also aware that at the time the trial court ruled on appellant’s motion, the Court of Criminal Appeals had not yet announced that the prosecutor “is responsible for crafting the conditions of an immunity agreement” and “is in the best position to evaluate performance before and after a dismissal.” Smith , 70 S.W.3d at 855 . 2002We are also aware that at the time the trial court ruled on appellant’s motion, the Court of Criminal Appeals had not yet announced that the prosecutor “is responsible for crafting the conditions of an immunity agreement” and “is in the best position to evaluate performance before and after a dismissal.” Smith, 70 S.W.3d at 855 . | 4 | 2002–2021 |
Campbell v. Regents of the University
green
2 sentences2011Coleman v. Dret-ke, 395 F.3d 216 , 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) ("Coleman’s holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all.”). 2011Coleman v. Dretke, 395 F.3d 216, 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) (" Coleman's holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all."). | 2 | 2010–2011 |
Tony Ray Coleman v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
green
2 sentences2011Coleman v. Dret-ke, 395 F.3d 216 , 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) ("Coleman’s holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all.”). 2011Coleman v. Dretke, 395 F.3d 216, 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) (" Coleman's holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all."). | 2 | 2010–2011 |
In Re Doe
green
2 sentences2004This Court’s opinion in In re Doe involved a female inmate of a privately managed jail facility who alleged she was raped while in custody. 22 S.W.3d 601 (Tex.App. — Austin 1994, orig. proceeding, mand. granted). 2004This Court's opinion in In re Doe involved a female inmate of a privately managed jail facility who alleged she was raped while in custody. 22 S.W.3d 601 (Tex. App.--Austin 1994, orig. proceeding, mand. granted). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Rogers, William
green
1 sentence2022Rogers, 550 S.W.3d at 193 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Stetler v. SRN Enterprises, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011Coleman v. Dret-ke, 395 F.3d 216 , 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) ("Coleman’s holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all.”). 2011Coleman v. Dretke, 395 F.3d 216, 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) (" Coleman's holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all."). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Kulesa v. Small
green
2 sentences2011Coleman v. Dret-ke, 395 F.3d 216 , 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) ("Coleman’s holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all.”). 2011Coleman v. Dretke, 395 F.3d 216, 225 (5th Cir.2004), reh'g en banc denied, 409 F.3d 665 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 938 , 126 S.Ct. 427 , 163 L.Ed.2d 325 (2005); see Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 926 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) (" Coleman's holding was about what process must be afforded to the releasee before sex offender conditions may be imposed, not about whether sex offender conditions may be imposed at all."). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
red
2 sentences1987The plurality in Northern Pipeline acknowledged that the public rights doctrine "may be explained in part by reference to the traditional principle of sovereign immunity, which recognizes that the government may attach conditions to its consent to be sued". 458 U.S. at 67 , 102 S.Ct. at 2869 . 1987The plurality in Northern Pipeline acknowledged that the public rights doctrine “may be explained in part by reference to the traditional principle of sovereign immunity, which recognizes that the government may attach conditions to its consent to be sued”. 458 U.S. at 67 , 102 S.Ct. at 2869 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Cochran v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n of Houston
green
2 sentences1983We held in Cochran v. American Savings & Loan Association, 586 S.W.2d 849 (Tex.1979), that it is not the lender's subjective intent to charge usury that makes a loan usurious, but rather his intent to make the bargain that was made. 1983We held in Cochran v. American Savings & Loan Association, 586 S.W.2d 849 (Tex.1979), that it is not the lender’s subjective intent to charge usury that makes a loan usurious, but rather his intent to make the bargain that was made. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State v. McDavitt
green
2 sentences1973These “qualifications” from Valdes were adopted by the Washington Court of Appeals, Div. 3, in State v. Ross, 7 Wash.App. 62 , 497 P.2d 1343 (1972). 6 Similar qualifications were required in Sate v. McDavitt, 62 N.J. 36 , 297 A.2d 849 (1972), by the New Jersey Supreme Court. 1973These “qualifications” from Valdes were adopted by the Washington Court of Appeals, Div. 3, in State v. Ross, 7 Wash.App. 62 , 497 P.2d 1343 (1972). 6 Similar qualifications were required in Sate v. McDavitt, 62 N.J. 36 , 297 A.2d 849 (1972), by the New Jersey Supreme Court. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State v. Ross
green
2 sentences1973These “qualifications” from Valdes were adopted by the Washington Court of Appeals, Div. 3, in State v. Ross, 7 Wash.App. 62 , 497 P.2d 1343 (1972). 6 Similar qualifications were required in Sate v. McDavitt, 62 N.J. 36 , 297 A.2d 849 (1972), by the New Jersey Supreme Court. 1973These “qualifications” from Valdes were adopted by the Washington Court of Appeals, Div. 3, in State v. Ross, 7 Wash.App. 62 , 497 P.2d 1343 (1972). 6 Similar qualifications were required in Sate v. McDavitt, 62 N.J. 36 , 297 A.2d 849 (1972), by the New Jersey Supreme Court. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Dalton v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc.
green
2 sentences1961Soc., Tex.Com.App., 213 S.W. 230, 231 , it is held that a contract of insurance “is to be construed in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions of the standard form of policy in use by the insurer at the time.” Our statutes provide that a policy of life insurance must contain and must not contain certain provisions. 1961Soc., Tex.Com.App., 213 S.W. 230, 231 , it is held that a contract of insurance "is to be construed in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions of the standard form of policy in use by the insurer at the time." Our statutes provide that a policy of life insurance must contain and must not contain certain provisions. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Penrod Drilling Co. v. Silvertooth
green
1 sentence1947The doctrine is recognized in Texas, and in the Supreme Court case of Honea v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 143 Tex. 272 , 183 S.W.2d 968, 969 , 160 A.L.R. 1445 , Judge Brewster concisely states the conditions under which the rule may be invoked: “Res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence whereby negligence of the alleged wrongdoer may be inferred from the mere fact that the accident happened, provided (1) the character of the accident and the circumstances attending it lead reasonably to the belief that, in the absence of negligence, it would not have occurred, and (2) the thing which caused the inj | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. Elliott
green
2 sentences1947In a proper case for the application of the rule where the physical facts involved in 'an accident are of such a character as to 'compel an inference that it resulted from 'negligence, such facts are themselves evidence of negligence, and it is incumbent upon the defendant, if he wishes to avoid the effect of the doctrine, to introduce evidence to explain, rebut or otherwise overcome the presumption or inference that the injury complained of was due to negligence.” Again, in the case of Wichita Falls Traction Company v. Elliott, 125 Tex. 248 , 81 S.W.2d 659, 664 , the Supreme Court in answer t 1947In a proper case for the application of the rule where the physical facts involved in 'an accident are of such a character as to 'compel an inference that it resulted from 'negligence, such facts are themselves evidence of negligence, and it is incumbent upon the defendant, if he wishes to avoid the effect of the doctrine, to introduce evidence to explain, rebut or otherwise overcome the presumption or inference that the injury complained of was due to negligence.” Again, in the case of Wichita Falls Traction Company v. Elliott, 125 Tex. 248 , 81 S.W.2d 659, 664 , the Supreme Court in answer t | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Honea, by Next Friend v. Coca Cola Bot. Co.
green
2 sentences1947The doctrine is recognized in Texas, and in the Supreme Court case of Honea v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 143 Tex. 272 , 183 S.W.2d 968, 969 , 160 A.L.R. 1445 , Judge Brewster concisely states the conditions under which the rule may be invoked: “Res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence whereby negligence of the alleged wrongdoer may be inferred from the mere fact that the accident happened, provided (1) the character of the accident and the circumstances attending it lead reasonably to the belief that, in the absence of negligence, it would not have occurred, and (2) the thing which caused the inj 1947The doctrine is recognized in Texas, and in the Supreme Court case of Honea v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 143 Tex. 272 , 183 S.W.2d 968, 969 , 160 A.L.R. 1445 , Judge Brewster concisely states the conditions under which the rule may be invoked: “Res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence whereby negligence of the alleged wrongdoer may be inferred from the mere fact that the accident happened, provided (1) the character of the accident and the circumstances attending it lead reasonably to the belief that, in the absence of negligence, it would not have occurred, and (2) the thing which caused the inj | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Arado v. Keitel
neutral
1 sentence1946However, in order for appellants to obtain the benefit of the employment experience of the predecessor corporation in computing their contribution rate for 1943, the requirements of clause (b) of said subsection * * * must also be satisfied. * * *. ” See also Lindley case, supra, and Arado v. Keitel, Mo.Sup., 182 S.W.2d 176 . | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Byrnes v. Curtin
neutral
2 sentences1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . 1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Harris v. Seinsheimer
neutral
2 sentences1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . 1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Wallace v. Stevens
neutral
2 sentences1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . 1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Webb v. Koger
neutral
2 sentences1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . 1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Bush v. Barron
neutral
2 sentences1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . 1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Wootters v. Hale
green
2 sentences1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . 1937In support of the last proposition, see Wootters v. Hale, 83 Tex. 563 , 19 S.W. 134 ; Harris v. Seinsheimer, 67 Tex. 356 , 3 S.W. 307 ; Bush v. Barron, 78 Tex. 5 , 14 S.W. 238 ; Wallace v. Stevens, 74 Tex. 559 , 12 S.W. 283 ; Byrnes v. Curtin (Tex.Civ.App.) 208 S.W. 405 . | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.