valid arbitration clause in New Jersey

2024That rule, founded on general state law principles of agency, is that when "a principal is bound under the terms of a valid arbitration clause, its agents, employees, and representatives are also covered under the terms of such agreements." Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 7 F.3d 1110, 1121 (3d Cir. 1993).

1994See, Arnold v. Arnold Corp., 920 F. 2d 1269 , 1281-82 (6th Cir.1990); Letizia v. Prudential Bache Securities, 802 F. 2d 1185, 1187-88 (9th Cir.1986). [7 F. 3d at 1121.] In compelling arbitration of the trustees' ERISA claim against MLAM, the Pritzker court reasoned: For analogous reasons, we find that the claims against MLAM, the corporate sister of MLPF & S, likewise fall within the scope of the arbitration agreements.

2020In addition, an agreement to arbitrate "must be the product of mutual assent," which "requires that the parties have an understanding of the terms to which they have agreed." Id. at 442 (quoting NAACP v. Foulke Mgmt., 421 N.J.

2020Buckeye, 546 U.S. at 445 ; Delta Funding Corp. v. Harris, 189 N.J. 28, 46 (2006).

2006When a contract involving interstate commerce contains a valid arbitration clause, the clause is governed by the FAA, specifically section 2, which states: A written provision in any maritime transaction or a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction, or the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, or an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration an existing controversy arising out of such a contract, transaction, or refusal, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save up

2006When a contract involving interstate commerce contains a valid arbitration clause, the clause is governed by the FAA, specifically section 2, which states: A written provision in any maritime transaction or a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction, or the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, or an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration an existing controversy arising out of such a contract, transaction, or refusal, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save up

2006When a contract involving interstate commerce contains a valid arbitration clause, the clause is governed by the FAA, specifically section 2, which states: A written provision in any maritime transaction or a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction, or the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, or an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration an existing controversy arising out of such a contract, transaction, or refusal, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save up

1994See, Arnold v. Arnold Corp., 920 F. 2d 1269 , 1281-82 (6th Cir.1990); Letizia v. Prudential Bache Securities, 802 F. 2d 1185, 1187-88 (9th Cir.1986). [7 F. 3d at 1121.] In compelling arbitration of the trustees' ERISA claim against MLAM, the Pritzker court reasoned: For analogous reasons, we find that the claims against MLAM, the corporate sister of MLPF & S, likewise fall within the scope of the arbitration agreements.

1994See, Arnold v. Arnold Corp., 920 F. 2d 1269 , 1281-82 (6th Cir.1990); Letizia v. Prudential Bache Securities, 802 F. 2d 1185, 1187-88 (9th Cir.1986). [7 F. 3d at 1121.] In compelling arbitration of the trustees' ERISA claim against MLAM, the Pritzker court reasoned: For analogous reasons, we find that the claims against MLAM, the corporate sister of MLPF & S, likewise fall within the scope of the arbitration agreements.

1980“These are questions appropriate for determination by an arbitrator and/or the courts.” Ridgefield Park Ed. Ass’n v. Ridgefield Park Bd. of Ed., 78 N.J. 144, 154 (1978).