7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kpmg LLP v. Cocchigreen2 sentences2016See KPMG LLP v. Cocchi, 132 S. Ct. 23, 24 , 181 L. 2016See KPMG LLP v. Cocchi, 132 S. Ct. 23, 24 , 181 L. | 2 | 2 |
Eli Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.green2 sentences2015See Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, 7 F.3d 1110 , 1122 (3rd Cir. 1993) (because a principal is bound under the terms of a valid arbitration clause, its agents, employees, and representatives are also covered under the terms of such agreements.). 2011Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., 7 F.3d 1110, 1121 (3rd Cir. 1993). | 2 | 2 |
Burkett, R. v. St. Francis Country Housegreen1 sentence2017Id. at 34-35 (citations omitted). 7 The Supreme Court also stated: We recognize that Rule 213(e) is a procedural mechanism to control case flow, and does not substantively target arbitration. | 1 | 1 |
Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrdgreen1 sentence2016See KPMG LLP v. Cocchi, 132 S.Ct. 23 (U.S. 2011) (per curiam), citing Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd, 470 U.S. 213, 217 (1985) (“The Act has been interpreted to require that if a dispute presents multiple claims, some arbitrable and some not, the former must be sent to arbitration even if this will lead to piecemeal litigation.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re:Est. of Atkinson, J., Appeal of: Wells Fargo
green
1 sentence2021See R.R. at 58a; Order, 2/20/20, at 1 n.1; Atkinson, 231 A.3d at 897-98 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Arnold v. The Arnold Corporation
green
1 sentence2015In Arnold v. Arnold Corp., 920 F.2d 1269 , 1281-82 (6th Cir. 1990), the court enforced an arbitration agreement entered into by the corporation. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance Companies
green
2 sentences2003Progressive argues that pursuant to Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance Companies, 455 Pa.Super. 295 , 688 A.2d 177 (1996) the subject matter presented, interpretation of the rights and duties under an insurance policy, is proper for judicial determination. 2003Progressive argues that pursuant to Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance Companies, 455 Pa.Super. 295 , 688 A.2d 177 (1996) the subject matter presented, interpretation of the rights and duties under an insurance policy, is proper for judicial determination. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.